- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
In situations like the Chauvin trial, can a jury be protected?
Posted on 4/20/21 at 9:01 pm
Posted on 4/20/21 at 9:01 pm
It doesn't seem like juries were meant to function as they did for this high profile trial. How can we expect jury members to honestly deliberate and make a decision without being influenced by outsiders and / or the fear of being outed if they don't comply with the mob? Is it possible to have a truly anonymous set of jurors, where the members of the jury can serve as they were meant to, without fear of retaliation? I'm sure it could be done, where only a few people know their identities.
IMO, a jury should operate like an anonymous messageboard, such as this one, which would give jurors much more freedom to express their ideas and opinions without fear of retaliation. Instead, the jury in a high profile case like this one operates more like a private group on facebook, where there is a pretext that it is private but it really isn't.
IMO, a jury should operate like an anonymous messageboard, such as this one, which would give jurors much more freedom to express their ideas and opinions without fear of retaliation. Instead, the jury in a high profile case like this one operates more like a private group on facebook, where there is a pretext that it is private but it really isn't.
7
Posted on 4/20/21 at 9:04 pm to SUB
(no message)
This post was edited on 4/21/21 at 11:46 am
Posted on 4/20/21 at 9:04 pm to SUB
Why protect them when you can direct them?
Posted on 4/20/21 at 9:05 pm to SUB
quote:Not if MSM wants them to make decisions a certain way
Is it possible to have a truly anonymous set of jurors, where the members of the jury can serve as they were meant to, without fear of retaliation?
Posted on 4/20/21 at 9:07 pm to SUB
Why even have them in the court room where they can be seen by everyone?
Posted on 4/20/21 at 9:09 pm to MrFizzle
quote:
How the hell do you know it wasn’t “really private” lol.
Do the jurors not learn enough about each other to leak their identity if they want?
Posted on 4/20/21 at 9:10 pm to hg
(no message)
This post was edited on 4/21/21 at 11:47 am
Posted on 4/20/21 at 9:11 pm to LegendInMyMind
quote:
LegendInMyMind
You really respond to each and every single Dim thread, don't you
Posted on 4/20/21 at 9:11 pm to SUB
(no message)
This post was edited on 4/21/21 at 11:47 am
Posted on 4/20/21 at 9:12 pm to SUB
do what the mob wants or you and your family will burn or be torn apart
Posted on 4/20/21 at 9:15 pm to Sao
quote:
You really respond to each and every single Dim thread, don't you
I don't think all of them. I may have missed one or two.
Posted on 4/20/21 at 9:16 pm to MrFizzle
They aren’t really anonymous when any Jim Bob or Jo Ann working at the courthouse probably has access to their names/information.
Posted on 4/20/21 at 9:16 pm to MrFizzle
quote:
Judges can rule that jurors can not reveal other jurors personal information, in California for example.
I assumed that was true. But the past several years have revealed that people don't give a shite about rules or the law and will find a way to leak info if they can.
Posted on 4/20/21 at 9:17 pm to MrFizzle
quote:
How the hell do you know it wasn’t “really private” lol. Did you read an article on Facebook?
How exactly would a jury benefit from a forum where they can express opinions anonymously from a bunch of slap dicks who don’t anything about jurisprudence?
Well, you seem smart
Posted on 4/20/21 at 9:19 pm to MrFizzle
I heard most the jurors wanted to vote not guilty but Maxine Waters powerful speech swayed their decision
Posted on 4/20/21 at 9:23 pm to SUB
(no message)
This post was edited on 4/21/21 at 11:47 am
Posted on 4/20/21 at 9:26 pm to LegendInMyMind
Did you watch Tucker and watching Blonde girl now?
Posted on 4/20/21 at 9:27 pm to Sao
Is this where you pretend to be the jaded independent
Posted on 4/20/21 at 9:34 pm to MrFizzle
quote:
The jury was anonymous dumbass. They never showed them on screen
I’m clearly not talking about that dumb frick
Posted on 4/20/21 at 9:40 pm to SUB
quote:
IMO, a jury should operate like an anonymous messageboard,
I don't know about that, but it's absolutely crazy that they weren't sequestered.
Page 1 of 2
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News