re: Im becoming a conspiracy nut

If you believe in the demolition stuff and other theories related to physical evidence, then it's basically trusting one side's experts over another. So, you basically have to believe in Architects/Engineers 9/11 Truth dudes over the dozens/hundreds that support the official story. I guess that's your prerogative, but unless you really understand the physics, engineering, and chemistry, etc., I don't know how you can tell who's right. All of that said, Building 7 looks like a load of bull to me. But, I am too dumb to understand the hard science.

I do think there are some interesting theories on the non-physical evidence. I always thought the wargames stunk a bit. This guy's theory for the motive doesn't carry much weight now with energy prices in the tank, but the means and opportunity are interesting.
Simplifying the case against Dick Cheney.
That said, I think you'd have something more along the lines of privatized military/intel running things, not a government official with a bad heart. That is the idea this crazy guy Webster Tarpley talks about in his Synthetic Terror book.



Truthers always seemed to be split down the middle on the Pentagon. Half believe it's the achilles heel of the official story and that some missile/drone thing hit the Pentagon, while others said those theories are disinfo and that the official story is true there.

quote:

---

Building 7 looks like a load of bull to me

---

I don't need the reports to be skeptical. Just watch the video in frame by frame. Fire is chaotic and random. There was no randomness in the way that building fell. Add that to the fact that 3 buildings fell in there own footprint that day and something smells fishy. That is like being dealt a royal flush 3 hands in a row.

There is no doubt in my mind that Saudi Arabia knew that the attacks were going to happen.

When Japan bombed Pearl Harbor, the US sort of "provoked" them. We cut off their oil supply. I think FDR was expecting some type of retaliation, but not to the degree in which they did.

At the time, public opinion was against the US getting involved in WWII. After Japan attacked where did we go? We went to Europe first, then took care of Japan after Hitler was defeated.

Of course, after we were bombed, public opinion suddenly shifted and there was a lot more support for us to go to war.

quote:

---

Add that to the fact that 3 buildings fell in there own footprint that day and something smells fishy

---

Dumb shite like this is why people need to listen to actual experts and not YouTube videos and people trying to sell books

quote:

---

Dumb shite like this is why people need to listen to actual experts and not YouTube videos

---

now what would be the fun of that?

My mother and father in law were on the Staten Island ferry the morning the planes hit. He says you could see faces in the Windows as the planes flew over the water and towards the WTC. While I think there was more to it, there's no doubt in my mind those planes hit those buildings.

quote:

---

Add that to the fact that 3 buildings fell in there own footprint that day and something smells fishy

---

Obviously the cleanest demolition job ever:

LINK to fullsize picture

Another shot of debris falling into it's "footprint:"

quote:

---

I don't need the reports to be skeptical.

---

quote:

---

After reading about the saudis involvement in 9/11 I think I'm starting to believe that 9/11 was staged

---

that's like saying WWII was staged because American companies were actively doing business with Hitler. It just means we have an idiotic govt and idiotic foreign policy and based on the idea that 'the enemy of our enemy is our friend.'

quote:

---

Pentagon financials tied to black operations destroyed in the pentagon attack.

---

Wait I thought the Pentagon attack never happened? Which is it?