- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
If Germany had developed a the Atomic bomb first who would they have used it on?
Posted on 6/23/16 at 3:07 pm
Posted on 6/23/16 at 3:07 pm
Moscow to bring the war back to a single front quickly?
Great Britian before the D day invasion?
Great Britian before the D day invasion?
24
Posted on 6/23/16 at 3:08 pm to Old Sarge
London
Posted on 6/23/16 at 3:08 pm to Old Sarge
College Station
Posted on 6/23/16 at 3:08 pm to Old Sarge
Papua New Guinea
Posted on 6/23/16 at 3:09 pm to Old Sarge
London than Moscow after that
Posted on 6/23/16 at 3:09 pm to Cash
quote:
London
Probably the only practical answer. Strap it to a V2 and sling it.
Posted on 6/23/16 at 3:11 pm to Old Sarge
Jerusalem.
Posted on 6/23/16 at 3:11 pm to 1BamaRTR
quote:
London than Moscow after that
Why do both? The other would surrender quickly once the German army could be focused on just one front.
This post was edited on 6/23/16 at 3:13 pm
Posted on 6/23/16 at 3:21 pm to VermilionTiger
quote:
College Station
That would've been my vote
Posted on 6/23/16 at 3:24 pm to Old Sarge
Those early bombs were very heavy and Germany had nothing powerful enough to deliver it anywhere. Even if they'd developed heavy bombers, they'd have had to fly through pretty effective air defenses, and the V-2 was nowhere close to being able to do the job.
Moscow and London would have been perfectly safe.
Moscow and London would have been perfectly safe.
Posted on 6/23/16 at 3:26 pm to Old Sarge
quote:
Why do both? The other would surrender quickly once the German army could be focused on just one front
Because Hitler would have enjoyed the carnage. Plus he wasn't one to hold back
Posted on 6/23/16 at 3:32 pm to Cobrasize
We would be living in a world with two superpowers. Germany and the US
Posted on 6/23/16 at 3:36 pm to TrumpTiger
London
Posted on 6/23/16 at 3:38 pm to Old Sarge
quote:
If Germany had
But they didn't, because Germany fricking sucks.
Posted on 6/23/16 at 3:41 pm to Old Sarge
Moscow, Stalingrad, then maybe some outlying British city just to make them quit if they hadn't by then already. He didn't want to destroy Britain or the U.S.
Posted on 6/23/16 at 3:42 pm to Old Sarge
quote:
who would they have used it on?
The Jews.
Posted on 6/23/16 at 3:59 pm to Tigerbait337
My man
Posted on 6/23/16 at 4:07 pm to colorchangintiger
In my estimation, somewhere in the USSR, then quick overtures for a negotiated peace with the Anglo-American alliance, and then reluctantly against Great Britain.
Posted on 6/23/16 at 4:15 pm to Old Sarge
Hitler actually admired the British. On the other hand he considered Russians as sub-human dogs.
He'd have bombed Moscow for sure if possible. The question though would be how would he deliver a nuclear device to either city?
He'd have bombed Moscow for sure if possible. The question though would be how would he deliver a nuclear device to either city?
Posted on 6/23/16 at 4:18 pm to BigPapiDoesItAgain
Something similar to this. They would would have made an example of the USSR and threw everything they had at the largest cities that they could reach eliminating one front of the war. I don't think that they would have stopped at France and Great Britain would have fallen soon after. I also don't think that they had any delusions of crossing the Atlantic and actually winning a war here.
Page 1 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News