- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: How meteorologists used to warn the public about incoming tornadoes
Posted on 7/5/20 at 11:22 am to Tarps99
Posted on 7/5/20 at 11:22 am to Tarps99
quote:
A vacuum cleaner could do the same thing.
Whoa, I'd forgotten all about that.
It would also mess with Atari games, which were played on channel 3.
Posted on 7/5/20 at 11:26 am to DownSouthCrawfish
quote:
Guess people were fricked if the power cut off.
"Tornado imminent"
Posted on 7/5/20 at 11:28 am to RollTide1987
Now, imagine that being the only thing you had for the 1974 Super Outbreak.
Posted on 7/5/20 at 11:29 am to RollTide1987
I worked in Oklahoma one summer. First night there, I was watching Tulsa TV and they reported potential for tornadoes.
Then they reported the weather center in OK City had been hit by a tornado,
Then one by one, two of the three Tulsa stations went off the air, as I was x'ing out counties on the state map where there were confirmed tornadoes that night.
Never did hit where I was, but there was not a lot of precision in the warnings they issued.
Then they reported the weather center in OK City had been hit by a tornado,
Then one by one, two of the three Tulsa stations went off the air, as I was x'ing out counties on the state map where there were confirmed tornadoes that night.
Never did hit where I was, but there was not a lot of precision in the warnings they issued.
Posted on 7/5/20 at 12:00 pm to Hangover Haven
quote:
Crazy, 40 years ago was 1980

Posted on 7/5/20 at 12:05 pm to Nawlens Gator
quote:
This is the method WABF uses now.
I guess you are talking about WAFB, but they are high VHF on channel 9 and WBRZ is high VHF on 13.
High VHF is less prone to electrical interference, UHF performs the best,
WAFB’s problem is that they got stuck with an incredibly low power level with the channel 9 frequency. At some point in the last 10 years they could and should have applied and received power increases on channel 9 as other stations did. They were sandwiched between WVUE and KLFY on 8 and 10 respectively. (8 went back to 29 on their pretransition channel. I don’t know what KLFY did if they sought power increases.) WAFB could have applied to go back to their pretransition channel of 46 as what WVUE did and build it out to full power, since they only ran that transition channel at low power if I recall correctly.
Just for power comparison, in a place like Miami, WSVN uses channel 7 to operate, and they started the digital transition with decent power and had to eventually up their power to almost 158 kW to get a comparable signal to the digital full power UHFs. Meanwhile WAFB is still putting out 5.57 kW.
This post was edited on 7/5/20 at 12:10 pm
Posted on 7/5/20 at 1:31 pm to Tarps99
Tarps99
Wow, you just educated me. Good job and thanks for the info!
Popular
Back to top

0






