Started By
Message

re: How do Creationists reconcile discoveries that date back hundreds of millions of years

Posted on 7/19/22 at 12:14 pm to
Posted by CoyoteSong
Colorado
Member since Aug 2021
2603 posts
Posted on 7/19/22 at 12:14 pm to
quote:

crazy4lsu


There is your answer which is “you have no answer”.

I am not shocked by your inability to give an answer.
Posted by Gravitiger
Member since Jun 2011
11510 posts
Posted on 7/19/22 at 12:14 pm to
Except you keep responding

"Just let me be right and have the last word!"
This post was edited on 7/19/22 at 12:16 pm
Posted by CoyoteSong
Colorado
Member since Aug 2021
2603 posts
Posted on 7/19/22 at 12:16 pm to
quote:

40 to 50 million years ago


That is Not observable. That requires faith.


Try again.
Posted by CoyoteSong
Colorado
Member since Aug 2021
2603 posts
Posted on 7/19/22 at 12:17 pm to
quote:

Gravitiger


I assume you are an atheist. Is this correct?
Posted by NATidefan
Two hours North of Birmingham
Member since Dec 2008
36582 posts
Posted on 7/19/22 at 12:18 pm to
quote:

That is Not observable. That requires faith.


Try again.


The DNA evidence that says dogs and cats are related is observable.
This post was edited on 7/19/22 at 12:19 pm
Posted by GRTiger
On a roof eating alligator pie
Member since Dec 2008
65899 posts
Posted on 7/19/22 at 12:18 pm to
quote:

"I'm right. You should just agree to disagree. That will make my day easier.


Well, the whole idea behind "agree to disagree" is that both parties can make their day easier by saying "I'm right" and both being ok with it.

So yea, your condescending statement is pretty much right, if only half way.
Posted by LSURep864
Moscow, Idaho
Member since Nov 2007
11084 posts
Posted on 7/19/22 at 12:18 pm to
quote:

Except you keep responding



To you, for now, Correct. To beerJeep no. He may carry on at this point and I will not respond.


Same goes to you at this point. Good day.
Posted by CoyoteSong
Colorado
Member since Aug 2021
2603 posts
Posted on 7/19/22 at 12:22 pm to
quote:

The DNA evidence that says dogs and cats are related is observable.


I want observable evidence of a change of kind.


Posted by Dawgirl
Member since Oct 2015
6279 posts
Posted on 7/19/22 at 12:24 pm to
quote:

I want observable evidence of a change of kind.


He cant provide that kind of evidence because none of us were around. Thats why it is all "in theory."
Posted by Gravitiger
Member since Jun 2011
11510 posts
Posted on 7/19/22 at 12:25 pm to
quote:

I assume you are an atheist. Is this correct?
Yes
Posted by Gravitiger
Member since Jun 2011
11510 posts
Posted on 7/19/22 at 12:27 pm to
quote:

Well, the whole idea behind "agree to disagree" is that both parties can make their day easier by saying "I'm right" and both being ok with it.
Unless one of them keeps compulsively responding, like he did.
Posted by Gravitiger
Member since Jun 2011
11510 posts
Posted on 7/19/22 at 12:28 pm to
quote:

I want observable evidence of a change of kind.
*"equal to the scientific method"
Posted by NATidefan
Two hours North of Birmingham
Member since Dec 2008
36582 posts
Posted on 7/19/22 at 12:32 pm to
quote:

I want observable evidence of a change of kind.


Well I guess you need to try to live for a long fricking time to observe one group of animal offsprings split and eventually through generations you'll have two animals you consider different "kinds", I don't know what to tell you.

Saying things didn't happen cause it takes longer than the life of a human is pretty fricking ignorant.

You want an immediate "change of kind" as proof of evolution when everyone here has told you that isn't what evolution says happens.

We can't provide what we agree does not exist. All we can try to provide is what evolution actually claims.

When you decide to understand that, maybe you'll get it.

This post was edited on 7/19/22 at 12:34 pm
Posted by Bronc
Member since Sep 2018
12646 posts
Posted on 7/19/22 at 12:33 pm to
quote:

He cant provide that kind of evidence because none of us were around. Thats why it is all "in theory."


That's not really accurate at all, a Scientific theory is "An explanation of an aspect of the natural world and universe that has been repeatedly tested and corroborated in accordance with the scientific method, using accepted protocols of observation, measurement, and evaluation of results."

It's much, much more well established than when creationists misapply their personal definition of "theory" as used in casual conversation to conflate what would be called in science a "hypothesis" with a "scientific theory."
Posted by NATidefan
Two hours North of Birmingham
Member since Dec 2008
36582 posts
Posted on 7/19/22 at 12:35 pm to
quote:

He cant provide that kind of evidence because none of us were around. Thats why it is all "in theory."


Tell me you don't know what a theory in science is without telling me you don't know what a theory in science is.
Posted by crazy4lsu
Member since May 2005
37688 posts
Posted on 7/19/22 at 12:37 pm to
quote:

I am not shocked by your inability to give an answer.



I'm not shocked by your inability to grasp any answer though. You have no understanding of anything and want to be treated as though you do.
Posted by GRTiger
On a roof eating alligator pie
Member since Dec 2008
65899 posts
Posted on 7/19/22 at 12:39 pm to
He compulsively responded to the person he made the statement to? I think you're lying, but more likely you're just so fired up you are missing context.

Try not to be quite as big of a twat as the guy he was actually speaking to, if possible.
Posted by Zephyrius
Wharton, La.
Member since Dec 2004
8577 posts
Posted on 7/19/22 at 12:39 pm to
Apparently Evolution is an official religion according to Tigerdroppings as the thread has been anchored.
Posted by CoyoteSong
Colorado
Member since Aug 2021
2603 posts
Posted on 7/19/22 at 12:41 pm to
quote:

He cant provide that kind of evidence because none of us were around. Thats why it is all "in theory."


Yes, 100% agree. They have to have faith to believe their evolution even though it pains them to state it.
Posted by NATidefan
Two hours North of Birmingham
Member since Dec 2008
36582 posts
Posted on 7/19/22 at 12:46 pm to
quote:

Yes, 100% agree. They have to have faith to believe their evolution even though it pains them to state it.


Nope, DNA evidence pretty much summed it all up years ago. No faith or belief system needed.



This post was edited on 7/19/22 at 12:48 pm
Jump to page
Page First 18 19 20 21 22
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 20 of 22Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram