- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Hilary Duff confronts guy taking photos of kids at her child’s soccer game
Posted on 2/24/20 at 6:07 pm to Ed Osteen
Posted on 2/24/20 at 6:07 pm to Ed Osteen
quote:
Paparazzi are paid a lot of money for these pictures
Yeah I am well aware of how it works, but if you show a picture of kids no one ever seen and title it "See Hilary Duff's kid at soccer practice" and put it next to "Pictures of Michael Jordan leaving Kobe's Service" where are people clicking?
Pictures must have value in order to sell them.
0
Posted on 2/24/20 at 6:07 pm to Godfather1
quote:Except a guy with a high priced, high powered lens taking pictures of kids he isn't associated with.
there’s no just indication that’s what’s happening
quote:What does that mean? How does that keep pictures of her kids from being sold?
The dude offered to show her his ID. If his pictures of her kid showed up somewhere, she’s got his arse.
Posted on 2/24/20 at 6:07 pm to Ed Osteen
quote:
Are you really that obtuse to think the guy with that kind of lens is just taking pics of her kid to test his camera out?
who’s to say he even knew she and her kids were there? didn’t even seem like he knew who she was when she confronted him. paparazzi aren’t the only people with nice cameras. i see where you’re coming from but at the same time it’s likely she just overreacted.
also, wouldn’t he need pictures of hilary herself included with the pictures of her kids if he were in fact paparazzi?
This post was edited on 2/24/20 at 6:10 pm
Posted on 2/24/20 at 6:07 pm to Ed Osteen
quote:
celebrities doing “Normal people” things
I understand.. But her kids are not celebrities jackass.
Posted on 2/24/20 at 6:08 pm to Godfather1
quote:
there’s no just indication that’s what’s happening here
Ok? All I’m saying is that it’s understandable a celebrity mom wouldn’t want her kids picture being taken by paparazzi. Of course it’s legal to do, it’s just a shitty thing to do.
Posted on 2/24/20 at 6:08 pm to PearlJam
quote:
Except a guy with a high priced, high powered lens taking pictures of kids he isn't associated with.
Well I mean, that’s it then. Clearly the guy could ONLY be a paparazzi.
Posted on 2/24/20 at 6:09 pm to NorthTxLSU
quote:
don’t really see the issue here. dude wasn’t harassing anyone nor was he taking pictures of her, and he even offered to show his ID.
You must not have kids. So a random guy taking pictures of kids with no kids of his own is ok? Especially after one of the mothers asked him to stop. That’s a problem.
This post was edited on 2/24/20 at 6:10 pm
Posted on 2/24/20 at 6:09 pm to OweO
quote:
I understand.. But her kids are not celebrities jackass.
She is, which makes her kids a photo opportunity. Do you really need me to explain anything else to you?
Posted on 2/24/20 at 6:09 pm to Dizz
quote:
Do you have an example
Yea, but I am not ready to play that card right now.
Posted on 2/24/20 at 6:09 pm to John88
Could someone explain to me why it is "creepy" to take pictures of kids playing soccer? Maybe if you see the same person repeatedly photographing your kids, but a one time thing? Why is that creepy?
Posted on 2/24/20 at 6:10 pm to Godfather1
quote:Way to jump from "no indication" to not the "only" thing he could be doing.
Clearly the guy could ONLY be a paparazzi.
Posted on 2/24/20 at 6:11 pm to PearlJam
quote:
Way to jump from "no indication" to not the "only" thing he could be doing.
Way to pick up on sarcasm.
Posted on 2/24/20 at 6:12 pm to Godfather1
Are you saying your "no indication" line was sarcasm? Or your shitty retort which was clearly not sarcasm, was sarcasm?
Posted on 2/24/20 at 6:12 pm to PrivatePublic
Personally I’d rather not have some guy taking a picture of my daughter. Maybe that’s weird. Idk but that’s how I feel.
I’m not sure how this is even debatable.
I’m not sure how this is even debatable.
Posted on 2/24/20 at 6:13 pm to BoxmanTiger
quote:
I’m not sure how this is even debatable.
Only on this board
Posted on 2/24/20 at 6:14 pm to Ed Osteen
quote:
Find me a parent on this board that would be cool with his 7 year olds picture being sold for a profit and published worldwide
I entirely see her side, but to play devil's advocate here.. the media posts photos from public events all the time. All the way down to little ole Baton Rouge events being photographed by WAFB or whatever. Plenty of posters here have likely been caught in a photo taken by local media or a local business hosting an event, and their kids may have too. Nobody seems to think there's an issue with that.
I understand that the being sold for profit due to who they are is what makes this different than that, but I feel like you can get into muddy grey area very quickly trying to define what is allowable and what isn't in regards to this.
Posted on 2/24/20 at 6:14 pm to BoxmanTiger
quote:
I’m not sure how this is even debatable.
It's not debatable because your opinion is based on your feelings. Do you have any reasoning to go with it?
Posted on 2/24/20 at 6:15 pm to John88
What a scumbag
Posted on 2/24/20 at 6:15 pm to LouisianaLady
It's not illegal and I'm not sure it should be. I'm just saying I understand why it would bother her and I don't blame her for trying to shame the guy. It's her only defense.
Posted on 2/24/20 at 6:16 pm to PearlJam
quote:
Are you saying your "no indication" line was sarcasm? Or your shitty retort which was clearly not sarcasm, was sarcasm?
I’m not going thru this line by line with you. You picked up on the implication.
The fact that the guy has a nice camera does not mean that he is a paparazzo. And she had no evidence to prove that he was. Fair enough?
Page 3 of 8
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News