Started By
Message

re: Has technology today made great photography less impressive?

Posted on 2/27/21 at 11:58 pm to
Posted by HubbaBubba
F_uck Joe Biden, TX
Member since Oct 2010
45772 posts
Posted on 2/27/21 at 11:58 pm to
quote:

They don’t start out as a bunch of mediocre shots that are later edited in photoshop, they are great the moment they are taken.
Exactly. So tired of the HDR "look" and overly filtered shopped images.
Posted by lostinbr
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Oct 2017
9381 posts
Posted on 2/28/21 at 1:03 am to
quote:

It was more of a thread about how much simpler it is to take a great photo now that cameras are so advanced

I think you’re understating the skill required to take truly “great” photos.

I would say that there are really two separate conversations to be had on this topic. The first is the improvement in cell phone cameras, which has been drastic over the past 5-10 years. The “floor” when it comes to photo quality is MUCH higher than it has ever been, for sure. Cell phone cameras have improved to the point where the average person who doesn’t really “know” photography can probably take MUCH better pictures with a phone than they can with a DSLR.

But it doesn’t really sound like that’s what you’re talking about. So the other topic is how much professional cameras have improved. And I guess that depends on how far you want do go back. DSLR’s are certainly easier to use than old school film cameras. You don’t have to frick with actually developing the photos either.

But you do still have to know photography. You have to understand the technical aspects like lighting or aperture vs. shutter speed, as well as the “art” aspects like composition/framing. Since the introduction of DSLR’s, there have been phenomenal technical advances in areas like sensor quality, image stabilization, and autofocus. Those advances raise the ceiling for photo quality, and they definitely make action shots easier. But a state of the art camera in the hands of an amateur still takes amateur photos.
Posted by Tchefuncte Tiger
Bat'n Rudge
Member since Oct 2004
57230 posts
Posted on 2/28/21 at 1:37 am to
Yes.
Posted by HubbaBubba
F_uck Joe Biden, TX
Member since Oct 2010
45772 posts
Posted on 3/1/21 at 10:02 am to
quote:

a state of the art camera in the hands of an amateur still takes amateur photos.
Exactly. I am a rank amateur, and do my best to gain mastery over my cameras (CANON 5D Mark IV and EOS R).

My son, on the other hand, is a professional photographer and he can take photos I only dream of taking. He knows exactly what he's looking for and sets up for his shots with both on-site preparation or live action where he's constantly making adjustments and carries multiple cameras and lenses with him.

He has added, however an iPhone 12 to his use, and has created some amazing photos with it using Photoshop and Lightroom.
Posted by PhantomMenace
Member since Oct 2017
1946 posts
Posted on 3/1/21 at 5:27 pm to
Nice. I have a 5D Mark III and a three other Canon predecessors. Been tempted recently by some prices of used Mark IVs since I already have lenses.

Having quality equipment surely helps if you can read the 400 page user manual and learn the basics. With my old film gear I would never have shot the 250 photos that I took of two beautiful models yesterday. Film rolls of 36 images would likely have put some limits on that. The drawback of shooting volume is that you stay up all night deciding which shots to edit.

Joining a camera club will help you learn, expose you to discussion and critique of images, and motivate you. I found through decades of looking at images that I know what I like in an image and I sometimes try to emulate shots I've seen by others.
Posted by Sansonvauter
Member since Apr 2022
2 posts
Posted on 4/27/22 at 6:35 am to
It seems to me that photography and the impression of photography depend largely on the talent of the photographer.
Posted by soccerfüt
Location: A Series of Tubes
Member since May 2013
65701 posts
Posted on 4/27/22 at 6:42 am to
Weird bump of a 14 month-old thread.

Posted by udtiger
Over your left shoulder
Member since Nov 2006
98855 posts
Posted on 4/27/22 at 6:47 am to
For the most part, yes.

Pro versus amateur with the same equipment? Pro will provide consistently better quality and quantity.

But an amateur with the most up to date iPhone or Galaxy can take some pretty fricking good photos.
Posted by Obtuse1
Westside Bodymore Yo
Member since Sep 2016
25650 posts
Posted on 4/27/22 at 6:52 am to
quote:

All a sports or nature photographer today really has to do is just find the action and then click a button, sort through the thousands of photos later to find a few epic ones.


You could have made the same argument when motor drives because available for film cameras, just change thousands to hundreds.

Photographic quality has gone up over the years as rising technology has raised all boats but great photographers would be great in any era. Mawmaw with her iPhone and freeware editing suite is never going to be better than Neil Leifer, Annie Leibovitz, or Ansel Adams.
Posted by Pettifogger
Capitol Hill Autonomous Zone
Member since Feb 2012
79231 posts
Posted on 5/2/22 at 12:10 pm to
Drone photography is probably an area where average photographers with good equipment can take some remarkable shots simply due to the novelty and new perspectives.

But like anything else that will change as some hone skills and set new standards for quality and composition. But I do think there are now a lot of opportunities to create "new" iconic images from those perspectives, so that should be exciting for amateur photographers interested in that area.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 3Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram