- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

GOP senator's son slams critics of ad featuring interracial family
Posted on 5/3/16 at 2:20 pm
Posted on 5/3/16 at 2:20 pm
He was triggered
LINK
McCain and his wife Renee
P.S. good for the party to be on the right side of this (pun INTENDED)
LINK
McCain and his wife Renee
P.S. good for the party to be on the right side of this (pun INTENDED)
This post was edited on 5/3/16 at 2:23 pm
Posted on 5/3/16 at 2:23 pm to tke857
Why didn't you say it was McCain, so we would know he's not a real Republican senator
Posted on 5/3/16 at 2:24 pm to Kafka
quote:
Why didn't you say it was McCain, so we would know he's not a real Republican senator
click bait sir
Posted on 5/3/16 at 2:24 pm to tke857
Ironically the people he's slamming are the GOP's base 
This post was edited on 5/3/16 at 2:30 pm
Posted on 5/3/16 at 2:35 pm to Lee to Toliver
Wait, so people are outraged at these ads because why? Do they seriously have nothing better to do these days? Jesus Tapdancing Christ.
I would love to personally punch every single person in the face that either has an issue with such an ad, or expresses their "outrage".
I would love to personally punch every single person in the face that either has an issue with such an ad, or expresses their "outrage".
Posted on 5/3/16 at 2:40 pm to tke857
The article should have at least shown what outrage they are talking about.
Posted on 5/3/16 at 2:46 pm to Chucktown_Badger
quote:
I would love to personally punch every single person in the face that either has an issue with such an ad, or expresses their "outrage".
Is it "expressing outrage" to note that there is an agenda behind many of these ads?
Posted on 5/3/16 at 2:47 pm to Patton
quote:
The article should have at least shown what outrage they are talking about.
It was a quick propaganda piece. They didn't have time for stuff like that.
Posted on 5/3/16 at 2:53 pm to Mo Jeaux
quote:
Is it "expressing outrage" to note that there is an agenda behind many of these ads?
All advertisements have an agenda. Is the agenda associated with this ad nefarious in nature?
Posted on 5/3/16 at 2:58 pm to Goldrush25
quote:
All advertisements have an agenda. Is the agenda associated with this ad nefarious in nature?
Kind of what I was wondering. What's the agenda behind an ad which features an interracial couple without spelling it out that isn't simply the normalcy of it? It's 2016, not 1956.
Posted on 5/3/16 at 3:00 pm to tke857
You should have done this thread as a WYHI instead. And Yes, Yes I would.*
*3 and 5 that is. In that order.
*3 and 5 that is. In that order.
Posted on 5/3/16 at 3:08 pm to Mo Jeaux
quote:And what agenda might that be?
Is it "expressing outrage" to note that there is an agenda behind many of these ads?
Posted on 5/3/16 at 3:09 pm to tke857
That's obviously not his kid.
Posted on 5/3/16 at 3:12 pm to ellunchboxo
quote:Is that the source of the outrage?
That's obviously not his kid.
Posted on 5/3/16 at 3:17 pm to MontyFranklyn
I don't know.
But why not get a mixed race kid?
But why not get a mixed race kid?
Posted on 5/3/16 at 3:18 pm to Chucktown_Badger
(no message)
This post was edited on 5/3/16 at 3:19 pm
Popular
Back to top


15








