Started By
Message

re: Found: wreck of Yamato sister ship Musashi

Posted on 3/5/15 at 10:53 am to
Posted by Spaceman Spiff
Savannah
Member since Sep 2012
20036 posts
Posted on 3/5/15 at 10:53 am to
quote:

Wasn't the Japanese war plan based on destroying the U.S. aircraft carriers at Pearl Harbor and then trying to swiftly negotiate a peace plan? They knew they couldn't defeat the US in a protracted engagement - too much industrial capacity, too many resources and too much manpower.


I believe it was. At least in part. The Japanese knew that they had to destroy our carrier force. If I remember correctly, a later part of the initial plan was to take Pearl Harbor - hence the attack on Midway. Their goal (and the reason they fell for the bait) was to use Midway as staging for Pearl. They weren't intent on landing in the U.S. mainland (keep in mind they did in the Aluetians) due to all sorts of logistics, manpower, etc., reasons. Their intent was to destroy our ability to wage a naval war which would have allowed them to keep the Pacific Empire. By the taking of Pearl, they wouldn't have been that far off from the west coast - and also would have been able to seal off the Panama Canal, too.
Posted by elprez00
Hammond, LA
Member since Sep 2011
31352 posts
Posted on 3/5/15 at 11:03 am to
quote:

But, of course, WW2 naval history is extremely interesting and I hope that I've written nothing to suggest otherwise.


Because of this thread, I ventured over to the largest battles in history Wiki. From the Battle of Philippine Sea.
quote:

The American F6F Hellcat fighter proved a capable weapon. Its powerful engine generated superior speed, and its protection and firepower made it rugged and deadly. The Japanese were still flying the A6M Zero, which though highly maneuverable and revolutionary during the early stages of the Pacific War, showed its age by 1943 standards as being underpowered and fragile, and quickly became obsolete in 1944. In addition, the D4Y "Judy", though fast, was also fragile and easily set afire. The Japanese naval airmen were also largely inadequately trained. The Japanese preparation programs could not replace the quality aviators lost during the past two years of the Pacific Campaign. Flying against the well-trained and often veteran U.S. aviators, it was a one-sided contest. The Americans lost fewer than two dozen Hellcats in air-to-air combat, and garnered nearly 480 Japanese kills, 346 of those carrier aircraft on 19 June alone.


20:1 Kill Ratio.
Posted by foshizzle
Washington DC metro
Member since Mar 2008
40599 posts
Posted on 3/5/15 at 11:09 am to
quote:

I assume he was referring to the name being "Invincible" and then the ship exploding.


That is correct. Sorry, I should have written "Not the appropriate name for the ship".
Posted by foshizzle
Washington DC metro
Member since Mar 2008
40599 posts
Posted on 3/5/15 at 11:35 am to
quote:

The story of the German Far East Naval Squadron based in Tsingtao China is fascinating.

Did the two German ACs have any chance at all to beat the British Battlecruisers, in your opinion? My reading of the situation gives them no chance.

Thanks for contributing to the conversation, foshizzle. I can tell that you have some professional-level knowledge of these topics.


Thanks for the kind words. I agree the German fleet was doomed once Spee rejected his captains' advice not to raid Stanley. That said, I believe their best chance was to have pressed the initial attack while Sturdee's squadron was at anchor instead of running.

For example, if they'd survived long enough they might have gotten close enough to aim 6 and 8 inch shells at the bridges of the immobile battlecruisers. If successful, they would still have been pounded by the British guns but the rest of the fleet could have escaped. Pure conjecture of course, but I think it would have maximized the chance that some of the ships would make it back to Germany.

ETA: I don't know if the fact that the British hadn't yet raised steam would have impacted their ability to operate the guns. I suspect not since otherwise the German commanders of the time would certainly have known that and pressed forward.
This post was edited on 3/5/15 at 12:48 pm
Posted by White Roach
Member since Apr 2009
9666 posts
Posted on 3/5/15 at 11:48 am to
19 June 1944 was known by aviators as the Great Marianas Turkey Shoot. The Japanese were completely outclassed.
Posted by Champagne
Sabine Free State.
Member since Oct 2007
53766 posts
Posted on 3/5/15 at 1:15 pm to
quote:

I don't know if the fact that the British hadn't yet raised steam would have impacted their ability to operate the guns. I suspect not since otherwise the German commanders of the time would certainly have known that and pressed forward.



I also don't know whether the hydraulic systems that operate a big ship's guns are dependent on that ship's boilers being fully up to steam. It's a good question.

Graf von Spee was a good man. We are back to discussing the interesting aspects of World War One naval war ! The stories of the German East Asia Squadron, Graf von Spee and the Raider Emden will tickle the fancy of any Bluejacket.
Posted by asurob1
On the edge of the galaxy
Member since May 2009
26971 posts
Posted on 3/5/15 at 2:05 pm to
quote:

You're only saying this because of hindsight. The Japanese controlled the Pacific for quite a while, and it was not an easy struggle, and certainly not a fait accompli, for them to be defeated.



Even the Japanese Navy recognized that they could hold the Americans off for a year, maybe two (to give time for peace negotiations), but no rational Japanese military man thought they could defeat the Americans. Now more then a few members of the Japanese military were hardly rational...(thus Kamikazes and the like)
Posted by asurob1
On the edge of the galaxy
Member since May 2009
26971 posts
Posted on 3/5/15 at 2:06 pm to
quote:

Utah is also still on the bottom of Pearl Harbor, I'm pretty sure.


Correct, but by the time of Pearl Harbor she was a target/training ship.

There is a small memorial where she sank.
This post was edited on 3/5/15 at 2:13 pm
Posted by 777Tiger
Member since Mar 2011
89186 posts
Posted on 3/5/15 at 2:09 pm to
quote:

Correct, but my the time of Pearl Harbor she was a target/training ship.


there is an overturned hull beached just north of battleship row visible when landing in HNL, I was told that was what's left of the Utah? maybe not?
Posted by asurob1
On the edge of the galaxy
Member since May 2009
26971 posts
Posted on 3/5/15 at 2:12 pm to
quote:

The Americans lost fewer than two dozen Hellcats in air-to-air combat, and garnered nearly 480 Japanese kills, 346 of those carrier aircraft on 19 June alone.


This was because the difference between the Japanese aviator training program and the American one.

The Japanese naval arm produced some damn fine pilots. The problem was that it was slow and they were very very picky about who was trained. Once with the fleet they stayed with the fleet until they were KIA. Which happened in droves at Midway. Eventually they lowered the standards and shortened the training cycle which left them with half trained pilots in combat squadrons.

The Americans rotated pilots in and out of the fleet allowing new aviators to be trained by veteran ones. The result was the US was producing better pilots and faster. The result is battles like the Philippine Sea.
Posted by Spaceman Spiff
Savannah
Member since Sep 2012
20036 posts
Posted on 3/5/15 at 2:27 pm to
quote:

The Japanese naval arm produced some damn fine pilots. The problem was that it was slow and they were very very picky about who was trained. Once with the fleet they stayed with the fleet until they were KIA. Which happened in droves at Midway. Eventually they lowered the standards and shortened the training cycle which left them with half trained pilots in combat squadrons.


This. By the time of the Mariannas Turkey Shoot, the Japs had lost the majority of skilled pilots.

They were losing them at a faster rate than they could be fully trained. Which is exactly what led to the Turkey Shoot. It doesn't matter the status of the A6M - even though it was sorely outclassed (and before anything is said about the Zero being severely outclassed, take a minute to think about the F4F Wildcat...) - if there weren't any pilots who could use its capabilities.

It really boiled down to skilled, veteran pilots going up against newbies.
This post was edited on 3/5/15 at 2:30 pm
Posted by foshizzle
Washington DC metro
Member since Mar 2008
40599 posts
Posted on 3/5/15 at 5:46 pm to
quote:

I also don't know whether the hydraulic systems that operate a big ship's guns are dependent on that ship's boilers being fully up to steam. It's a good question.


Yeah, if so then the Germans might have profited from this. If not then of course the battlecruisers would also have benefited from the close quarters combat and just slaughtered them. Technical details like this matter.

Still, I suspect the Germans would have done better with this than they actually did in the end, but I'm being an armchair admiral now. At the time von Spee's decision to flee was pretty reasonable since all he had to do was run for the horizon and hope the Brits couldn't raise steam quickly enough to get moving.

You can bet there were some very nervous German officers calculating what the British could see visually given the height of their masts vs. the height of German masts, and how much of a head start they needed before the race could begin. But they didn't have time to do this before the go/no-go decision to charge on in was made.
Posted by AUTimbo
Member since Sep 2011
3234 posts
Posted on 3/5/15 at 7:47 pm to
The Japanese were not trying to conquer the US in WW2. The whole purpose of Pearl Harbor was to hurt the US Pacific fleet bad enough to cause the US to stay out of the Pacific theater, and hopefully out of a formal war.

Not to mention if the Japanese had used their submarine fleet to attack merchant vessels as ours did vs. having orders to ONLY engage US warships, then the Pacific campaign might not have turned out the way it did.
If not for what happened at Midway,(which could EASILY have been a nightmare for us instead of the Japanese,) we may have never had the opportunity to build a Pacific fleet that could safely venture out of San Fran Bay.


(Just saw Spiffs comments above. He said it much better than I attempted here)
This post was edited on 3/5/15 at 7:52 pm
Posted by Champagne
Sabine Free State.
Member since Oct 2007
53766 posts
Posted on 3/5/15 at 9:43 pm to
quote:

You can bet there were some very nervous German officers calculating what the British could see visually given the height of their masts vs. the height of German masts, and how much of a head start they needed before the race could begin. But they didn't have time to do this before the go/no-go decision to charge on in was made.


Yes, it was SUCH a mis-match.

The Battlecruisers Inflexible and Invincible, if I recall correctly, were faster than Spee's ACs, so they could overhaul them in a chase. The BCs were more heavily armored than Spee's ACs. If I recall correctly, Spee's squadron possessed no gun that could penetrate the armor belts of the BCs. And of course the British BCs carried guns powerful enough to tear the German ACs to pieces.

Like you say, the best chance Spee had was to surprise the enemy BCs at anchor and slam them with torpedoes, maybe at night or something. What a mis-match.

Still, as you say, if von Spee had been able to run away far enough to avoid being overhauled before dark, he might have been able to escape during the night.
This post was edited on 3/5/15 at 9:47 pm
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 5Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram