- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Fertility Rates by country
Posted on 9/23/23 at 9:57 am to beerJeep
Posted on 9/23/23 at 9:57 am to beerJeep
quote:
I can’t imagine thinking a communist can think generations ahead
If the CCP had the ability to look generations ahead they wouldn’t have conducted the great famine nor initiated the one child policy.
Considering the global elites have openly expressed the last few years we need a population reduction, I would say China is very much in line with planning ahead.
1
Posted on 9/23/23 at 9:57 am to JayDeerTay84
quote:
You are the one saying reduction in X is bad. I asked you what the ideal number is?
Ideally you want at least replacement and parity amongst the sexes
quote:
You do realize they will have more young adults than the US correct? You know why? Bocuse they have so man people. You know, 1.4 billion.
And? India has more people than china. Doesn’t make India the city on the hill.
quote:
What is the ideal population size for China?
No such thing. It’s about proper demographics and the proper amount at the right ages.
China has neither.
quote:
What is the ideal population size for China? If you can sit there and say its bad, what is the ideal work for number for them as technology advances?
Again. Population size isn’t the issue.
It’s the mother fricking demographics. Their ages, and number of males and females at each stage of their life.
Holy.
fricking.
shite.
LEARN HOW TO frickING READ A POPULATION PYRAMID.
Posted on 9/23/23 at 9:59 am to beerJeep
quote:
Again. Population size isn’t the issue.
It’s the mother fricking demographics. Their ages, and number of males and females at each stage of their life.
Holy.
fricking.
shite.
LEARN HOW TO frickING READ A POPULATION PYRAMID.
Yes, and even with a reduction in birth rates, they will STILL have one of the largest working classes in the world. Maybe 2nd to india.
So again, can you tell me why its bad? Whey do they need so many MORE people? Especially as manual labor requirements will continue to be reduced due to technology.
Posted on 9/23/23 at 9:59 am to JayDeerTay84
quote:
Considering the global elites have openly expressed the last few years we need a population reduction, I would say China is very much in line with planning ahead.
And I would say you’re retarded.
Posted on 9/23/23 at 10:00 am to JayDeerTay84
quote:
Yes, and even with a reduction in birth rates, they will STILL have one of the largest working classes in the world. Maybe 2nd to india.
Which STILL won’t be enough to care for their AGING population nor have the replacement to care for the aging population when they grow old.
Their.
Demographics.
Are.
fricked.
Posted on 9/23/23 at 10:01 am to beerJeep
quote:
Which STILL won’t be enough to care for their AGING population nor have the replacement to care for the aging population when they grow old.
Their.
Demographics.
Are.
fricked.
I've already addressed this. They will just die.
Posted on 9/23/23 at 10:02 am to beerJeep
quote:
And I would say you’re retarded.
I understand you couldnt answer my question without insults.
Have a good one.
Posted on 9/23/23 at 10:05 am to JayDeerTay84
quote:
understand you couldnt answer my question without insults.
Because your retarded arse “what is the ideal population for china” question is fricking retarded.
There is no ideal population. It’s ideal demographics. The ratio of males to females. The ratio of babies, children, young adults, middle aged adults, and elderly that matter.
Things you are able to pull from a POPULATION PYRAMID.
know why it’s called a population PYRAMID? because it’s supposed to look like a fricking pyramid If your country has healthy demographics.
Remind me…. What does chinas population pyramid look like? What kind of data and information can you pull from it?
Go back to school and learn how to discuss population pyramids and demographics and come one back for round 2.
Posted on 9/23/23 at 10:07 am to yaboidarrell
Always gets me when I see some third-worlder woman lament how she make 12 cents a day, has to supplement her rice meal with dirt, she's single ever since her husband was killed by a donkey when he was making love to it, the roof to her shack is about to rust through, oh and "I have 12 children and another on the way".
Like, cheese an rice, stop letting dudes bust in you.
But I guess humans all over the world have been having litters of kids no matter their economic state for thousands of years.
Like, cheese an rice, stop letting dudes bust in you.
But I guess humans all over the world have been having litters of kids no matter their economic state for thousands of years.
Posted on 9/23/23 at 10:07 am to JayDeerTay84
quote:
They will just die
Here is the problem…and their economy will die with them.
Posted on 9/23/23 at 10:11 am to yaboidarrell
I'm surprised mexico isn't higher. Always had to double wrap when in Texas
Posted on 9/23/23 at 10:13 am to beerJeep
quote:
Because your retarded arse “what is the ideal population for china” question is fricking retarded.
There is no ideal population. It’s ideal demographics. The ratio of males to females. The ratio of babies, children, young adults, middle aged adults, and elderly that matter.
Of course there is an ideal population size with regards to economies.
Who gives a frick if your "pyramid" is perfect if you are a country the size of Louisiana.
In this context, you are talking about their global economic power.
China needs a reset.
Sure some short term pain, but if they play their cards right, probably better off in the long run.
Though, I dont think their downfall will be quite like everyone says. Most of the time, the masses are wrong on these things.
Posted on 9/23/23 at 10:14 am to Tyger32
quote:
Here is the problem…and their economy will die with them.
The old people he said aren't contributing but costing?
No.
Posted on 9/23/23 at 10:18 am to JayDeerTay84
quote:
Of course there is an ideal population size with regards to economies.
Wrong, again.
An economy can scale down to 100 people, no problem if the demographics work.
An economy can scale up to 100 trillion people, no problem, if the demographics work.
I’m dog walking you right now
quote:
Who gives a frick if your "pyramid" is perfect if you are a country the size of Louisiana.
Literally everyone because THAT IS WHAT TELLS YOU WHAT frickING MATTERS.
Holy.
Mother.
fricking.
shite.
This post was edited on 9/23/23 at 10:20 am
Posted on 9/23/23 at 10:18 am to JayDeerTay84
quote:
The old people he said aren't contributing but costing? No.
Man you know nothing about china
Posted on 9/23/23 at 10:22 am to beerJeep
quote:
I’m am dog walking you right now
Are you? because you hope China economy goes in the shitter acting like it woodlot take a part of the US with it.
Lets say you are right. It would be the worlds 2nd great depression.
Sure, if thats a battle you want to win because "frick China" sure.
But you haven't convinced me how a population reduction in China is "bad".
All that actually maters if if they have enough turnover to be productive and increase their value output and as I have said, as long as technology advances, they need less and less. You seem to just disregard value and output because "MUH PYRAMID!".
Posted on 9/23/23 at 10:24 am to yaboidarrell
The USA is a dying country with a 1.6 - 1.7 fertility rate. Demographics folks tell us we need a 2.4 birth rate just to maintain a level population. Hummmm? Now I see why the U.S. Chamber of Commerce is pushing for open borders. We're not generating our own workers. We started aborting them on January 22, 1973. The democrat controlled states are still aborting them.
This post was edited on 9/23/23 at 11:49 am
Posted on 9/23/23 at 10:27 am to JayDeerTay84
quote:
All that actually maters if if they have enough turnover to be productive and increase their value output and as I have said, as long as technology advances, they need less and less. You seem to just disregard value and output because "MUH PYRAMID!"
Come on dog, get to walking.
I’m sorry your retarded arse can’t grasp the fact that the ratio of ages and genders matter far more than the number of people
This post was edited on 9/23/23 at 10:29 am
Posted on 9/23/23 at 10:29 am to beerJeep
I remember when I had my 1st beer.
Posted on 9/23/23 at 10:32 am to beerJeep
quote:
I’m sorry your retarded arse can’t grasp the fact that the ratio of ages and genders matter far more than the number of people
Not when you have have 1.4 billion citizens.
What you are saying is they will run out of the “right people” based on demographics.
I’m saying they already have too many.
But it seems you are just too childish to talk about that.
Enjoy your day.
This post was edited on 9/23/23 at 10:33 am
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News