- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: FDA advisory committee recommends approval of "female viagra"
Posted on 6/12/15 at 11:23 am to TheCaterpillar
Posted on 6/12/15 at 11:23 am to TheCaterpillar
quote:
I know you're kidding, but nursing homes are hot beds of sexual activity. All those widows/widowers get down with each other.
Not kidding or exaggerating even slightly. Its gross/hilarious.
"According to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, there were 885 reported cases of syphilis in 45- to 64-year-olds in 2000; in 2010, there were more than 2,500. In 2000, there were 6,700 cases of chlamydia in this age group; the number ballooned to more than 19,000 by 2010."
Posted on 6/12/15 at 1:43 pm to RabidTiger
quote:
"According to the briefing documents, three studies that compared flibanserin with a placebo found that women using the drug had a median of 0.5 or 1.0 more satisfying sexual events a month, depending on the study. The median number of satisfactory sexual experiences each month before the drug test was two or three."
That is a HUGE difference for a lot of people. They have women in there that haven't had sex in 10 years.
quote:
I find this really surprising/hard to believe because these types of outcomes are not representative of the study data. That's why this drug has been rejected for approval so many times prior to this because on paper it doesn't seem to do much.
This is a naive statement. Its nothing to normal people. Its a lot to people born without libido. But don't listen to me, listen to the test patients who were crying tears of happiness in front of the FDA committee.
And the bigger reason it was rejected was safety concerns and lack of evidence, not evidence it doesn't work. There is a difference. They needed more data points for their argument. They provided more evidence, including patient testimony, this time around and it was approved.
quote:
The FDA has twice before rejected the drug, called flibanserin, after previous advisory panels concluded there were questions about its safety and insufficient evidence that the drug was effective for women with low sex drives.
quote:
Also, it's misleading to call this the "female Viagra" because it is taken long term like an SSRI and not as needed like Viagra.
Yeah, we covered that.
This post was edited on 6/12/15 at 1:51 pm
Posted on 6/12/15 at 2:08 pm to TheCaterpillar
Not disputing anything you are saying but every Doctor I have ever talked to has said the female sex organ is between their ears. If this stuff makes them THINK they are hornier then they will be.
But that if A OK as far as I am concerned.
But that if A OK as far as I am concerned.
Posted on 6/12/15 at 2:51 pm to jbgleason
quote:
Not disputing anything you are saying but every Doctor I have ever talked to has said the female sex organ is between their ears. If this stuff makes them THINK they are hornier then they will be.
But that if A OK as far as I am concerned.
It acts the same way an anti-depressant does I believe. It is all mental, but its chemically altering their mind to make them hornier.
So this:
quote:
Not disputing anything you are saying but every Doctor I have ever talked to has said the female sex organ is between their ears.
is correct and that's the area its affecting.
Posted on 6/12/15 at 2:55 pm to Bamboozles
quote:
FDA advisory committee recommends approval of "female viagra"
Don't get your hopes up. It is not a get her wet pill. Unlike Viagra it works on the brain to boost sex drive in women over time. Good news for married guys whose woman is no longer in the mood.
Posted on 6/12/15 at 2:57 pm to WeeWee
quote:
Don't get your hopes up. It is not a get her wet pill. Unlike Viagra it works on the brain to boost sex drive in women over time.
it won't replace the roofie?
Posted on 6/12/15 at 2:58 pm to 777Tiger
quote:
it won't replace the roofie?
Only if you can drop it in her drank everyday for a few months.
Posted on 6/12/15 at 3:00 pm to Bamboozles
That shite doesn't even work.
If your lady needs this, just let her spend a little time with me. Problem solved.
If your lady needs this, just let her spend a little time with me. Problem solved.
Posted on 6/12/15 at 3:05 pm to TheCaterpillar
Hey I hope it can help people I'm just saying the zero to nympho cases aren't reflected in the data.
I also still wouldn't call an extra 0.5 satisfying experience per month a huge difference. Someone is supposed to take a pill that alters brain chemistry every day so they can have sex 6 times a year?
0.5 to 1.0 was median as well. So half the participants in some of the studies had less than a 0.5 per month increase vs placebo.
From NYT
"But the panel’s recommendation was laced with so many caveats that it seems clear that this particular drug — flibanserin — is only marginally effective and carries some risk of serious adverse effects."
I also still wouldn't call an extra 0.5 satisfying experience per month a huge difference. Someone is supposed to take a pill that alters brain chemistry every day so they can have sex 6 times a year?
0.5 to 1.0 was median as well. So half the participants in some of the studies had less than a 0.5 per month increase vs placebo.
From NYT
"But the panel’s recommendation was laced with so many caveats that it seems clear that this particular drug — flibanserin — is only marginally effective and carries some risk of serious adverse effects."
Posted on 6/12/15 at 3:08 pm to TheCaterpillar
I thought this pill was designed specifically for menopausal/post menopausal women who had developed some specific type of sexual disorder?
I had also read that the feminazis were pushing for the drug because it had been soooo long since a pill(s) was created for men and there had been almost no development on the vaginal front?
I had also read that the feminazis were pushing for the drug because it had been soooo long since a pill(s) was created for men and there had been almost no development on the vaginal front?
Popular
Back to top

0




