- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

Electromagnetic therapy clinical trial reverses alzheimers decline
Posted on 9/25/19 at 5:12 pm
Posted on 9/25/19 at 5:12 pm
LINK
quote:
In the ongoing efforts to control and treat Alzheimer's, one of the more promising avenues of research is using electromagnetic waves to reverse memory loss – and a small study using this approach has reported some encouraging results.
The study only involved eight patients over a period of two months, so we can't get too excited just yet, but the researchers did see "enhanced cognitive performance" in seven of the participants.
In this case, the volunteers – who all have mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease (AD) – were fitted with what's called a MemorEM head cap, which uses specially developed emitters to create a custom flow of electromagnetic waves through the skull. Treatments are applied twice daily, for an hour, and they can be easily administered at home.
alz electro 2(Arendash et al., 2019, Journal of Alzheimer's Disease)
The MemorEM device is being developed by NeuroEM Therapeutics, and we should point out that two of the authors behind the new study founded the company – so there is some vested commercial interest here.
That said, the research has produced a peer-reviewed, published paper, and shows some results that are definitely worthy of future investigation.
"Perhaps the best indication that the two months of treatment was having a clinically-important effect on the AD patients in this study is that none of the patients wanted to return their head device to the University of South Florida/Byrd Alzheimer's Institute after the study was completed," says biologist Gary Arendash, who is CEO of NeuroEM Therapeutics.
According to Arendash, one patient even said: "I've come back."
The study builds on previous research from the same team that concentrated on mice, which showed that this transcranial electromagnetic treatment (TEMT) was capable of protecting against memory loss, and even reversing it in older rodents.
Based on the evidence so far, TEMT looks like it can break up the toxic amyloid-beta and tau proteins that have been extensively linked with Alzheimer's – the waves are apparently able to destabilise the weak hydrogen bonds that hold them together.
These proteins essentially clog up the brain, scientists think, suffocating and destroying neurons we rely on to hold on to memories, turn thoughts into speech, and work out where we are in the world.
Using a commonly accepted set of tests designed to measure dementia, the impact of the electromagnetic waves was found to be "large and clinically important". This ADAS-Cog scale runs from an average of five for someone without Alzheimer's, to an average of 31 for those with Alzheimer's, and the study noted an average shift of more than four points in seven out of the eight volunteers.
That four point shift matches the sort of cognitive decline you might expect to see in Alzheimer's patients over a year – so it was as if a year of the impact of Alzheimer's on cognitive thinking had been rolled back in the space of just two months.
The advantage of this kind of treatment is that it can target the poisonous proteins directly and effectively. That's something that current drugs struggle with, thanks in part to the blood-brain barrier designed to keep our brains protected from foreign bodies.
What's more, the study showed the eight subjects showed no side effects or any signs of damage to the brain caused by the TEMT treatment.
Similar approaches are being tried by other companies – including Neuronix, which applies transcranial magnetic stimulation techniques via a head cap. We've still got a long way to go, but the signs are promising so far.
The next stage is a bigger trial involving more volunteers with AD – and NeuroEM Therapeutics has plans for a clinical trial involving 150 participants later this year. If that trial shows the treatment to be safe and effective, regulatory approval could follow.
"Despite significant efforts for nearly 20 years, stopping or reversing memory impairment in people with Alzheimer's disease has eluded researchers," says neuroscientist Amanda Smith, from the University of South Florida.
"These results provide preliminary evidence that TEMT administration we assessed in this small AD study may have the capacity to enhance cognitive performance in patients with mild to moderate disease."
The research has been published in the Journal of Alzheimer's Disease.
Posted on 9/25/19 at 5:18 pm to Jim Rockford
Ever seen a tin foil hat person with Alzheimer’s?
Me neither.
They could be on to something.
Me neither.
They could be on to something.
Posted on 9/25/19 at 5:24 pm to soccerfüt
quote:I don't remember. Eddie, is that you? It's cold in here. Where's my sweater? Eddie, why you had yo dick in the sink? What was i saying?
Ever seen a tin foil hat person with Alzheimer’s
Posted on 9/25/19 at 6:07 pm to Jim Rockford
aka Shock treatment
I’ll do it, my memory is shite
I’ll do it, my memory is shite
Posted on 9/25/19 at 6:15 pm to Jim Rockford
This "study" will soon be forgotten. An industry funded single arm trial with 8 patients should not be considered in the least bit reliable.
Posted on 9/25/19 at 6:17 pm to NewOrleansBlend
They have to start somewhere so why are you bitching?
Posted on 9/25/19 at 6:19 pm to NewOrleansBlend
quote:
An industry funded single arm trial with 8 patients should not be considered in the least bit reliable.
Why not expand the trial.
Posted on 9/25/19 at 6:27 pm to idlewatcher
quote:
They have to start somewhere
I agree, I hope they find something soon. My mother died with it, and i wouldn't wish that on the family of my worst enemy.
Posted on 9/25/19 at 6:30 pm to NewOrleansBlend
Except it is being studied by more than one group or institution with similar results at all of them. Yes, it is small, but everything starts somewhere. By your logic, we would still have people dying of small pox.
This post was edited on 9/25/19 at 6:31 pm
Posted on 9/25/19 at 6:44 pm to idlewatcher
quote:
They have to start somewhere so why are you bitching?
Because quite frankly I hate bad science. These studies are of poor quality and the news articles that stem from them create false hope. And the authors know it. Studies with this design are considered phase 1, which are used to measure toxicity, not efficacy. In addition, what's stopping the company from performing this cheap study 10 times and only publishing the positive one? Happens all the time. Do you think there might be financial gain to be had in such a move? A larger randomized study would provide actual evidence, I will wait for that
This post was edited on 9/25/19 at 6:53 pm
Posted on 9/25/19 at 6:46 pm to The Mick
Electromagnetic, not shock.
Posted on 9/25/19 at 6:52 pm to MrLarson
quote:Did you read the article? They are expanding to 150 people.
Why not expand the trial.
Posted on 9/25/19 at 6:56 pm to NewOrleansBlend
quote:methinks the author is pals with the leader of this, and they think they're going to generate grassroots GoFundMe (without the GoFundMe), of mutually enriching gargantuan benefit.
Because quite frankly I hate bad science. These studies are of poor quality and the news articles that stem from them create false hope. And the authors know it. Studies with this design are considered phase 1, which are used to measure toxicity, not efficacy. In addition, what's stopping the company from performing this cheap study 10 times and only publishing the positive one? Happens all the time. Do you think there might be financial gain to be had in such a move? A larger randomized study would provide actual evidence, I will wait for that
This post was edited on 9/25/19 at 6:59 pm
Posted on 9/25/19 at 7:04 pm to Dandy Lion
I guarantee you people are begging to give this company huge sums of money to treat their loved one based on this because they are desperate. Which saddens me. For something with, I argue, still zero evidence
This post was edited on 9/25/19 at 7:06 pm
Posted on 9/25/19 at 7:12 pm to NewOrleansBlend
Agree 100%. Do a larger study, yes. But is this study worth getting excited about? No.
The same kind of shite pushes the toddler head shaping helmet industry. Junk science, the lot of it.
The same kind of shite pushes the toddler head shaping helmet industry. Junk science, the lot of it.
Popular
Back to top
3










