Started By
Message

re: Do we have any 9/11 Truthers on here

Posted on 3/9/17 at 9:43 pm to
Posted by upgrayedd
Lifting at Tobin's house
Member since Mar 2013
138056 posts
Posted on 3/9/17 at 9:43 pm to
quote:

Osama Bin Laden was a CIA asset named Tim Osman



Posted by goldennugget
NIL Ruined College Sports
Member since Jul 2013
26019 posts
Posted on 3/9/17 at 9:45 pm to
>
Posted by upgrayedd
Lifting at Tobin's house
Member since Mar 2013
138056 posts
Posted on 3/9/17 at 9:47 pm to
No way photoshop could've created that
Posted by Rebel
Graceland
Member since Jan 2005
141312 posts
Posted on 3/9/17 at 9:49 pm to
I wish mobile had emoticons.

I'd inset the yellow fella rolling on the floor.
Posted by PaperPaintball92
Fly Navy
Member since Aug 2010
5329 posts
Posted on 3/9/17 at 9:50 pm to
Go to the very bottom of the page. Select the view in desktop option.
Posted by northshorebamaman
Cochise County AZ
Member since Jul 2009
37470 posts
Posted on 3/9/17 at 9:50 pm to
Posted by TigersHuskers
Nebraska
Member since Oct 2014
14517 posts
Posted on 3/9/17 at 9:50 pm to
Or just turn your phone sideways.
Posted by texag7
College Station
Member since Apr 2014
40544 posts
Posted on 3/9/17 at 9:53 pm to
Why would they take the name Tim Osman and then go to almost the same name in Osama? That's a little too obvious to be believable
Posted by Willie Stroker
Member since Sep 2008
15595 posts
Posted on 3/9/17 at 10:00 pm to
quote:

goldennugget


You use a lot of "maybe"s and "could have"s for someone claiming to be a truther.

When it's the truth, those words aren't used.
Posted by tunechi
Member since Jun 2009
10531 posts
Posted on 3/9/17 at 10:05 pm to
TXTiger or whatever his username is is my favorite truther

Idk if he roams these boards anymore though or if aliens abducted him
This post was edited on 3/9/17 at 10:06 pm
Posted by theGarnetWay
Washington, D.C.
Member since Mar 2010
27157 posts
Posted on 3/9/17 at 10:31 pm to
Just to comment on my own post and apparent down votes... I am in no way shape or form a 9/11 truther. Truthfully, I can't stand those who are.

But what I bring up is what the CIA and the FBI knew before the attack and that's no secret, Google that info. They both had tons of leads and info on the hijackers, but info sharing between the two agencies was minimal due to their different mandates and the legal definitions behind them... plus the rivalry between the two agencies was decades old.

The Pat. Act. post 9/11 tore that info sharing wall down because of it.

It's not conspiracy, it's all fact.

I'm not saying either conspired, I'm saying both had pieces of the puzzle but couldn't put it all together... which was in part because of how little the two agencies shared between one another.
This post was edited on 3/9/17 at 11:26 pm
Posted by someoldhussy
Candyland
Member since Jun 2007
2439 posts
Posted on 3/9/17 at 11:05 pm to
I think goldennugget is a government operative who scours the web saying absurd things just to see who agrees with him. Those people are then placed on NSA watch lists as part of the initiative to prevent radicalized domestic terror attacks.
This post was edited on 3/10/17 at 8:19 am
Posted by PhiTiger1764
Lurker since Aug 2003
Member since Oct 2009
14453 posts
Posted on 3/9/17 at 11:08 pm to
quote:

Osama Bin Laden was a CIA asset named Tim Osman

Posted by BlackPawnMartyr
Houston, TX
Member since Dec 2010
16152 posts
Posted on 3/9/17 at 11:13 pm to
quote:

quote:
"The United States profits off of never ending war"


Explain this. I doubt you will.


Why believe GN when you can take it from a guy who has lived it.

quote:

War Is A Racket By Major General Smedley Butler


quote:

Awarded two congressional medals of honor
Distinguished service medal, 1919
Major General - United States Marine Corps


CLICK-ME


This post was edited on 3/9/17 at 11:15 pm
Posted by jim712
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2006
1521 posts
Posted on 3/9/17 at 11:16 pm to
Two words dude: building seven. Has not been explained. Does not fit official narrative
Posted by FeauxPaw
BRuh
Member since Sep 2015
1083 posts
Posted on 3/9/17 at 11:52 pm to
quote:

In the case of the WTC, theorists say the plane couldn't have possibly cut through the building like it did in the videos we see today. In the case of the Pentagon, theorists say the hole isn't wide enough, and that there was no damage where the wings would have hit.


This is where conspiracy theorists lose me. Okay, the planes could not have possibly done that. Then what should the planes have done? What is a head-on 747 impact into an office building supposed to look like?

"I dunno. It just isn't supposed to do that."
Posted by RocketPower13
Member since Jan 2017
2541 posts
Posted on 3/10/17 at 2:36 am to
Posted by AlonsoWDC
Memphis, where it ain't Ten-a-Key
Member since Aug 2014
9261 posts
Posted on 3/10/17 at 3:08 am to
quote:

As with everything, follow the money


It's like what Lenin said - you look for the person who will benefit, and, uh, uh...
You know what I'm trying to say...

THAT frickING BITCH!
Oh yeah!
Posted by Iron Lion
Romulus
Member since Nov 2014
13703 posts
Posted on 3/10/17 at 3:10 am to
Shut the frick up Donnie
Posted by Rebel
Graceland
Member since Jan 2005
141312 posts
Posted on 3/10/17 at 3:13 am to
Building 7 has been explained ad nauseum.
This post was edited on 3/10/17 at 3:14 am
Jump to page
Page First 4 5 6 7 8 ... 13
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 6 of 13Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram