- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Do we have any 9/11 Truthers on here
Posted on 3/9/17 at 9:22 pm to goldennugget
Posted on 3/9/17 at 9:22 pm to goldennugget
I was in on it
0
Posted on 3/9/17 at 9:22 pm to The Boat
quote:
When they could have just flown the planes with the passengers on them into the WTC to destroy everything.
Maybe they did. If not swapped out for a drone the planes were already fitted for such technology. Vault 7 confirmed the tech is there.
Posted on 3/9/17 at 9:23 pm to goldennugget
quote:
Bush may have knew. Cheney probably knew.
Bush and Cheney probably knew about it but our government was not involved?
Posted on 3/9/17 at 9:24 pm to goldennugget
quote:
I don't think the government was involved. It was mainly intelligence agencies and foreign governments. Bush may have knew. Cheney probably knew.
AKA the government
Posted on 3/9/17 at 9:24 pm to northshorebamaman
quote:
Bush and Cheney probably knew about it but our government was not involved?
I think Cheney was involved
Bush wasn't
Bush was just a puppet. Cheney was a lot more involved.
Posted on 3/9/17 at 9:26 pm to goldennugget
United 175 never turned off its transponder and ATC was able to monitor it. It didn't land at an air field. Thanks for trolling about this because it'll let me kill some time tonight.
Posted on 3/9/17 at 9:27 pm to upgrayedd
Posted on 3/9/17 at 9:28 pm to The Boat
quote:
United 175 never turned off its transponder and ATC was able to monitor it. It didn't land at an air field. Thanks for trolling about this because it'll let me kill some time tonight.
The drone theory is just a theory
Even if the planes weren't swapped doesn't change the fact 9/11 could have been a false flag.
The hijackers were either intelligence assets or patsies.
Posted on 3/9/17 at 9:28 pm to The Boat
Some of these people probably suffer from schizophrenia .
Posted on 3/9/17 at 9:29 pm to goldennugget
quote:
The hijackers were either intelligence assets or patsies.
Absolutely no chance they weren't just religious fanatics?
Posted on 3/9/17 at 9:31 pm to PaperPaintball92
quote:
Absolutely no chance they weren't just religious fanatics?
Maybe but if they were they were weak patsies recruited and radicalized by the CIA/Mossad to do the job.
Posted on 3/9/17 at 9:32 pm to SCLibertarian
quote:
Here is a hilarious spoof of the Truther arguments.
Posted on 3/9/17 at 9:35 pm to goldennugget
quote:
The drone theory is just a theory
The most plausible theory, that has the most supporting evidence, is radical Muslim terrorists planned a genius plan to strike us on US soil. I've never seen one bit of evidence to contradict the truth. The "controlled" demolition of the towers is crap and the pentagon being hit by a middle is retarded.
Posted on 3/9/17 at 9:37 pm to Topwater Trout
quote:
The most plausible theory, that has the most supporting evidence, is radical Muslim terrorists planned a genius plan to strike us on US soil. I've never seen one bit of evidence to contradict the truth. The "controlled" demolition of the towers is crap and the pentagon being hit by a middle is retarded.
The muslim terrorists could have been recruited and radicalized by CIA/Mossad though and sent to do the job. That's what I think could have very well happened. Not too many CIA/Mossad would need to be involved in that for it to happen. Only a handful.
Posted on 3/9/17 at 9:37 pm to goldennugget
Like I said earlier people like you do a disservice to people actually trying to get real answers about 9/11 by saying the things like this.
You should be digging into things that really happened. Like why were there only 51 passengers on flight 175 and 76 on flight 11 which were planes that carry 200+ people.
Did the hijackers plan that out or did people in the government help them pick low load flights so their hijacking would be easier? It's easy to do in today's world but online technology and flight booking wasn't nearly as it is today back in 2001.
Why didn't they crash into a nuclear plant? It's said Osama later said that was part of a plan but later called off because it could "get out of hand". But that answer makes no sense in the grand scheme of their plans.
Truthers go too deep and too retarded when simple things like that are what could reveal answers.
You should be digging into things that really happened. Like why were there only 51 passengers on flight 175 and 76 on flight 11 which were planes that carry 200+ people.
Did the hijackers plan that out or did people in the government help them pick low load flights so their hijacking would be easier? It's easy to do in today's world but online technology and flight booking wasn't nearly as it is today back in 2001.
Why didn't they crash into a nuclear plant? It's said Osama later said that was part of a plan but later called off because it could "get out of hand". But that answer makes no sense in the grand scheme of their plans.
Truthers go too deep and too retarded when simple things like that are what could reveal answers.
Posted on 3/9/17 at 9:39 pm to The Boat
quote:
Why didn't they crash into a nuclear plant? It's said Osama later said that was part of a plan but later called off because it could "get out of hand". But that answer makes no sense in the grand scheme of their plans.
Osama Bin Laden was a CIA asset named Tim Osman. They probably thought about the nuclear strike but passed because they don't want to frick up things too bad.
They picked a building which had just been insured by its owner(Hmmmmm) to crash planes into.
Posted on 3/9/17 at 9:40 pm to upgrayedd
quote:
So explain to me how the US profits despite sinking trillions of dollars into war.
Not the US as a whole, but the people that are in war for financial gain. Dick Cheney and Bush to name a couple. Tax the people to fund the war and collect the profit. Its always been this way. If there wasnt any money in war, nobody would go through the trouble of starting them.
Posted on 3/9/17 at 9:41 pm to Topwater Trout
In the case of the WTC, theorists say the plane couldn't have possibly cut through the building like it did in the videos we see today. In the case of the Pentagon, theorists say the hole isn't wide enough, and that there was no damage where the wings would have hit.
This post was edited on 3/9/17 at 9:48 pm
Posted on 3/9/17 at 9:41 pm to saintsfan1977
quote:
Not the US as a whole, but the people that are in war for financial gain. Dick Cheney and Bush to name a couple. Tax the people to fund the war and collect the profit. Its always been this way. If there wasnt any money in war, nobody would go through the trouble of starting them.
As with everything, follow the money
Page 5 of 13
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News