- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Didn’t Coca-Cola go through this before? Personalized cans.
Posted on 8/10/26 at 11:13 am to CatfishJohn
Posted on 8/10/26 at 11:13 am to CatfishJohn
quote:
pretty sure my Ketel One could clean a toilet.
I had to look that up… I love vodka but haven’t had that one. I’m off likker til I finish getting fit.
0
Posted on 8/10/26 at 11:50 am to NawlinsTiger9
You not liking the story doesn’t dismiss its validity nor should it compel you to respond at all.
But here you are.
Weird.
But here you are.
Weird.
Posted on 8/10/26 at 11:51 am to cgrand
Because I’m sharing a story you don’t like or want to know is happening?
K.
K.
Posted on 8/10/26 at 12:07 pm to Odysseus32
quote:
why do you know this?
A guy did a whole tiktok/instagram series about it.
Democrats suck wasn’t allow but republicans suck was
Stuff like that. Basically if it was a perceived “right leaning” phrase it was rejected.
Posted on 8/10/26 at 12:09 pm to SouthEasternKaiju
Holy shite man. Does nobody know how to link things?
Posted on 8/10/26 at 12:10 pm to brass2mouth
quote:
A guy did a whole tiktok/instagram series about it.
This is actually worse.
Posted on 8/10/26 at 12:42 pm to Oilfieldbiology
There’s ample links in the thread. You’re on the internet.
Posted on 8/10/26 at 1:06 pm to SouthEasternKaiju
quote:
Stop excuse making, if that’s remotely possible.
Did you actually try to submit those phrases? Or are you just relying on second hand info?
Posted on 8/10/26 at 1:17 pm to SUB
quote:
Did you actually try to submit those phrases? Or are you just relying on second hand info?
It was reported that the 'glitch' was being worked on, so no, I didn't bother.
* As of time of posting, this link wasn't working for me. The chat help was also 'unavailable'.
coca-cola
This post was edited on 8/10/26 at 1:26 pm
Posted on 8/10/26 at 1:24 pm to SouthEasternKaiju
It would be nice if Coke was Bud Lighted. No reason other than it’s frickin poison.
Posted on 8/10/26 at 1:29 pm to Brotorious
I'm not gonna pretend I didn't grow up on the stuff, stopped drinking the sugar laden version when they changed the original to that 'new' coke crap. It's never tasted the same for me. But when they tried to tell their own employees to 'be less white', I pretty much abandoned the brand. And most soda in general. Not a purist, but I'll buy one here or there, not a case or 2 per week, like we used to.
This post was edited on 8/10/26 at 1:31 pm
Posted on 8/10/26 at 1:32 pm to SouthEasternKaiju
quote:
It was reported that the 'glitch' was being worked on, so no, I didn't bother.
Where'd you get the info in the OP about them not accepting those specific phrases?
Posted on 8/10/26 at 1:39 pm to SUB
quote:
Where'd you get the info in the OP about them not accepting those specific phrases?
Do you work for coca cola or something?
TBH, I first saw it on Instagram, which I could link but it's not as supported by the site as X or YT. So later on in the thread I posted a 2nd source, this time LoTikTok.
If it means that much to you, I can find the first place it came to my attention and post it here. The story is the story though. Not sure why some feel the need to question the validity.
It's weird, some seem to hate Coke, but still are siding with them, or they secretly LOVE Coke and don't want to hear any bad press? I don't get it.
Here
This post was edited on 8/10/26 at 2:22 pm
Posted on 8/10/26 at 2:26 pm to SouthEasternKaiju
quote:
Do you work for coca cola or something?
I have no skin in the game. Just curious where the info came from to prompt you to start a thread on it.
quote:
TBH, I first saw it on Instagram, which I could link but it's not as supported by the site as X or YT. So later on in the thread I posted a 2nd source, this time LoTikTok.
If it means that much to you, I can find the first place it came to my attention and post it here. The story is the story though. Not sure why some feel the need to question the validity.
You created a thread about some claim you saw shared by some rando on social media, did not validate if it's true or not, and then got super defensive when someone simply asks where you got the information from? Is that correct?
The story is the story though...
or rather, the story you shared is NOT the story in this case because it wasn't all correct.This post was edited on 8/10/26 at 2:31 pm
Posted on 8/10/26 at 2:33 pm to SUB
quote:
Then got super defensive when someone simply asks where you got the information from? Is that correct?
not 'super' defensive, just finding it weird AF that folks don't care about the actual story and instead are all up in arms about the messenger.
quote:
because it wasn't all correct
Except, it was. What part wasn't?
Posted on 8/10/26 at 2:36 pm to Odysseus32
quote:
This is actually worse.
It is.
It’s pretty bad that a guy could make a string of videos of CocaCola blocking numerous different sayings and phrases of perceived “right wing” or Christian values while allowing “left wing” and anti Christian phrases to go through.
Posted on 8/10/26 at 2:43 pm to SouthEasternKaiju
If Coca Cola is preventing some fool from walking around with a can of coke that says "Democrats Suck" they're doing them a big favor.
Posted on 8/10/26 at 2:51 pm to SouthEasternKaiju
quote:
not 'super' defensive, just finding it weird AF that folks don't care about the actual story and instead are all up in arms about the messenger.
The point of my question was to know "the actual story", something that you did not provide.
The "Allah is king" stuff being blocked was not true, which was pointed out just a few posts down from your OP on the first page. You framed this as some anti-Christian crusade by Coke, which it wasn't. You know this, so stop pretending you don't.
This post was edited on 8/10/26 at 2:53 pm
Posted on 8/10/26 at 2:58 pm to SUB
I provided evidence that it WAS true.
Next.
Next.
Posted on 8/10/26 at 3:04 pm to SUB
The New York Post ran a story two days ago and mentioned (wayyyy deep into the article) that phrases like “Black Lives Matter” and “Free Palestine” were also blocked - probably because there was an automated screening process that included numerous phrases, and the ones that slipped through were checked independently.
But hey, none of that made its way into the victimhood/conspiracy fetish that OP’s social media algorithms throat frick into him on a daily basis, so he has no clue about that
But hey, none of that made its way into the victimhood/conspiracy fetish that OP’s social media algorithms throat frick into him on a daily basis, so he has no clue about that
This post was edited on 8/10/26 at 3:05 pm
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News