- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 2/23/23 at 7:41 pm to JPLSU1981
quote:
So you admit Madison raped the boys?
Are you stupid or slow? I keep asking you where's the evidence that Kaivon and company were drunk and you reply "HuR dUrR sO you ADmiT MaDisOn raPEd da Boyz?"
They initiated the sex. They supposedly asked for consent multiple times. Without them initiating it doesn't happen. I mean, how hard is this to understand? I mean seriously.
But yes, if she initiated sex with them while they were intoxicated, then she raped them. If she asked for consent multiple times moments after Kaivon slumped over and didn't know his address, then yes, she raped poor Kaivon. I know that's what you want to hear
This post was edited on 2/23/23 at 7:44 pm
Posted on 2/23/23 at 7:46 pm to clip11
quote:
But yes, if she initiated sex with them while they were intoxicated, then she raped them
So then we agree?
(This is not your typical “rape”….That’s why it’s kinda controversial)
This post was edited on 2/23/23 at 7:47 pm
Posted on 2/23/23 at 7:46 pm to Elleshoe
I don't know why he keeps trying to insist they were drunk. Take that back, he's insisting it because he wants to win an argument.
Problem for him is the defendants aren't even claiming it. Out of everything we heard from the defense, the defendants being drunk isn't one of them.
Problem for him is the defendants aren't even claiming it. Out of everything we heard from the defense, the defendants being drunk isn't one of them.
Posted on 2/23/23 at 7:49 pm to JPLSU1981
She didn't initiate sex with them. So we don't agree. I don't even agree they were drunk. I don't think Kaivon even agrees he was drunk. That would be news to him. They initiated sex with her while she was unable to legally consent. You're just being stupid at this point and can't admit you're wrong
This post was edited on 2/23/23 at 7:53 pm
Posted on 2/23/23 at 7:49 pm to JPLSU1981
quote:
(This is not your typical “rape”
Yea. There usually isn't much resistance when you're barely functioning as a human
Posted on 2/23/23 at 7:50 pm to boosiebadazz
I’d take that under advisement.
Posted on 2/23/23 at 7:50 pm to clip11
quote:
She didn't initiate sex with then.
Says who???
I’m Wrong about what?…I don’t know all the facts, and not one single person outside the 5 in that car do.
This post was edited on 2/23/23 at 7:52 pm
Posted on 2/23/23 at 7:53 pm to JPLSU1981
The facts are she was 4x’s over and incapable of giving consent even if she literally said “yes”
Posted on 2/23/23 at 7:55 pm to Elleshoe
quote:
The facts are she was 4x’s over and incapable of giving consent even if she literally said “yes”
Even if I give you that, which actually is not “law” as most seem to think, what if the other two participants were Above the legal limit as well?
If drunk people can’t consent to sex, it applies to everyone. Not just people that die.
This post was edited on 2/23/23 at 7:59 pm
Posted on 2/23/23 at 7:57 pm to JPLSU1981
quote:
Even if I give you that, which actually is not “law” as most seem to think,
If someone is too incapacitated to consent then yes, my statement was correct. Fair enough that there no BAC attached but almost .32 weighs heavily that she was too incapacitated.
quote:
what if the other two participants were Above the legal limit?
There is literally no direct evidence of that. But I don’t expect you to understand what direct evidence is
Posted on 2/23/23 at 7:58 pm to JPLSU1981
It doesn’t matter. You seem to be arguing just for the sake of arguing and you’re making a fool of yourself
Posted on 2/23/23 at 7:59 pm to JPLSU1981
quote:
Says who???
Says Casen Carver in the police affidavit. The driver of the car. He was there. According to him, once she got into the car, he asked her for her address. She then slumped over and couldn't answer him. After she slumped over, Desmond asked her to have sex approximately 5 times (if she clearly and coherently agreed the first time or 2,why keep asking? my guess is he didn't get a reply the first 4 times and she uttered something that may have been interpreted as a yes the last time, that's my guess).
After Desmond was done, Kaivon did the same thing according to Casen.
Kaivon lied and told the cops no one had sex with anyone.
This post was edited on 2/23/23 at 8:10 pm
Posted on 2/23/23 at 7:59 pm to Elleshoe
Go get to .319 and tell me if you are still able to stick it up your boyfriend’s arse
Not saying something homophobic. Just going with the preference you declared
Edit:post is for JP
Not saying something homophobic. Just going with the preference you declared
Edit:post is for JP
This post was edited on 2/23/23 at 8:04 pm
Posted on 2/23/23 at 8:01 pm to clip11
You should watch the videos.
Posted on 2/23/23 at 8:01 pm to JPLSU1981
quote:
Says who???
Don’t you know?
All the posters on here were in the car and can tell you with 100% certainty what actually happened, and what didn’t happened.
And it’s impossible for a pretty white girl to initiate sex with a thug, or two, unless she’s beyond drunk.
Posted on 2/23/23 at 8:02 pm to tigerskin
quote:
Go get to .319 and tell me if you are still able to stick it up your boyfriend’s arse Not saying something homophobic. Just going with the preference you declared
I’m not sure why you’re attacking me. You’re probably a drunk beating his wife and weighing in without reading. I’m siding with the take that she was too drunk to consent yet there’s no direct evidence the guys were drunk
Posted on 2/23/23 at 8:03 pm to Elleshoe
Chill. That was meant for JP
Posted on 2/23/23 at 8:03 pm to JPLSU1981
quote:
What if both parties are drunk? Who is the “criminal”?
This stupid point had been beaten to death in this thread already. Can you just frick off?
Popular
Back to top


0


