- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Creationism and Evolution Questions
Posted on 6/13/25 at 9:21 pm to AmosMosesAndTwins
Posted on 6/13/25 at 9:21 pm to AmosMosesAndTwins
And yet we see scripture being fulfilled in the world constantly. But we we can’t trust the Bible, right?! We see it happening right now between Israel and Iran. Prophecy being proven throughout history and you still refuse to acknowledge it.
1
Posted on 6/13/25 at 9:26 pm to Artificial Ignorance
quote:
Should you? If qualified as forbidden (ever)…
Well as written, Eve came from Adam, thus all life generated from Adam. So "incest" wasn't, as all life began from the created man of God. It's quite incredible as an Almighty Creator deemed.
Posted on 6/13/25 at 9:28 pm to AmosMosesAndTwins
quote:
There’s more evidence to support evolution than evidence to support god’s existence, which is zero by the way.
Do you mean God as presented in the Bible, God in a different form, or no God at all! …in the context of evolution?
This post was edited on 6/13/25 at 9:29 pm
Posted on 6/13/25 at 9:30 pm to Who_Dat_Tiger
quote:
In 2025 every topic can only be black or white. People lack critical thinking skills more than ever and are dug in steadfast in their beliefs one way or the other and would debate any evidence presented that would oppose it.
The no nuance mindset has always been around but damn is it extremely prevalent now. Probably due to the internet and social media. Everyone from the news to content producers and everything from politics to social issues to sports is filled with nothing but hot takes and which/who is the worst or whatever all or nothing topic you can think of
If you told people even a few decades ago we would have all this instant easily accessible info and global connection at our fingertips, they probably would’ve thought people would want to be more knowledgeable and understanding of each other. Instead we’ve become more tribalistic in regards to everything
Posted on 6/13/25 at 9:32 pm to Artificial Ignorance
I think it’s a bit of both. Someone/something led us down a path that was designed. Some things branched off and evolved into other things
Posted on 6/13/25 at 9:32 pm to Fun Bunch
quote:
Is this a joke? There’s no need to rationalize anything. There’s no design to life whatsoever
Haven't studied life much, huh?
Posted on 6/13/25 at 9:33 pm to BestBanker
quote:
There’s more evidence to support evolution than evidence to support god’s existence, which is zero by the way.
Do you ever wonder how many different interpretations of this there are? And why that is, eg, why God either did not make it clear enough or make his creation with the ability to clearly interpret / ascribe His meaning to it? Why God does not think it is valuable enough to show up on Earth today to set His record straight for those struggling to get His message…
Posted on 6/13/25 at 9:40 pm to yakster
quote:
Prophecy being proven throughout history and you still refuse to acknowledge it.
Discern “prophecy” from:
1. Why God’s message did not land clearly on His people or why His creation did not interpret His message clearly enough. If landed efficiently, we do not have spectrum of Belief today, no?
2. Why are Jews the chosen people, as written by Isaiah, a Jew?
This post was edited on 6/13/25 at 9:41 pm
Posted on 6/13/25 at 9:44 pm to buzwa
quote:
You're living in a simulation.
Simulation debunks evolution.
Posted on 6/13/25 at 9:45 pm to DavidTheGnome
quote:
You say this like it’s a good thing
I didn’t say good or bad, that’s your misinterpretation.
“According to the Merriam-Webster's Dictionary, faith has multiple definitions, including "something that is believed especially with strong conviction", "complete trust", "belief and trust in and loyalty to God", as well as "a firm belief in something for which there is no proof".”
Posted on 6/13/25 at 9:46 pm to BestBanker
quote:
Well as written, Eve came from Adam, thus all life generated from Adam. So "incest" wasn't, as all life began from the created man of God.
Written by whom?
To progress life, by creationist design, it required sisters and brothers to create future generations. That is worthy of questioning, no?
Posted on 6/13/25 at 9:57 pm to LSUtoBOOT
Is Merriam-Webster dictionary God made (or man made)?
Worthy of questioning, no?
Worthy of questioning, no?
Posted on 6/13/25 at 10:01 pm to bigberg2000
quote:
I think it’s a bit of both. Someone/something led us down a path that was designed. Some things branched off and evolved into other things
For something so important…why all the interpretation?
If retiring (for example only), the path forward is far more clear (and desired to be clear…possibly relatively more interesting compared to life design)).
Why the path differences…worth questioning, no?
This post was edited on 6/13/25 at 10:04 pm
Posted on 6/13/25 at 10:03 pm to Artificial Ignorance
quote:
Is Merriam-Webster dictionary God made (or man made)?
Posted on 6/13/25 at 10:04 pm to Artificial Ignorance
quote:
1. How do Creationists reconcile its incestuous design (brothers and sisters required to make babies to create the world’s population)?
If I believe God can create everything that exists effortlessly with His own power then why would I think incest is a hurdle He can't overcome?
Posted on 6/13/25 at 10:07 pm to LSUtoBOOT
My learning that Eve’s ribs were born from Adam’s…has never made me pause to think about the number of female ribs. Life design…and scripture’s accurate connection to it…
Interesting to say the least, no?
Interesting to say the least, no?
Posted on 6/13/25 at 10:09 pm to Wishnitwas1998
quote:
why would I think incest is a hurdle He can't overcome?
If life’s design requires “overcoming incest”, that is worthy of questioning what one was taught / told, no?
Posted on 6/13/25 at 10:13 pm to Artificial Ignorance
quote:
If life’s design requires “overcoming incest”, that is worthy of questioning what one was taught / told, no?
maybe? I'm pretty tired tonight I just think it's kind of wild when people present these questions like "well God created the Heavens and the earth basically with the snap of his finger but splitting the Red Sea is not scientifically possible!"
If I have enough faith to believe the first part the second part isn't really a big deal
Posted on 6/13/25 at 10:14 pm to Artificial Ignorance
So god made the earth.
Then god was like Hold up.
this shite is boring. It need more shite.
God was like “ima put dinosaurs on that bitch”
Dinosaurs on that bitch
Then he like “why’d I put dinosaurs on that shite”
Then god was like Hold up.
this shite is boring. It need more shite.
God was like “ima put dinosaurs on that bitch”
Dinosaurs on that bitch
Then he like “why’d I put dinosaurs on that shite”
Posted on 6/13/25 at 10:15 pm to Artificial Ignorance
quote:
Do you ever wonder how many different interpretations of this there are? And why that is, eg, why God either did not make it clear enough or make his creation with the ability to clearly interpret / ascribe His meaning to it? Why God does not think it is valuable enough to show up on Earth today to set His record straight for those struggling to get His message…
As to interpretations, the Mosaic text is the genesis (no pun), and that would be where interpretation would evolve. As i understand the original meaning would be clear with the ability of man to make choice decisions that either coincide with the Creator's original intent or to go against. I believe that God made His physical presence in the form of the Man, Jesus, who showed Himself to the struggling man to set the record straight, fulfilling prophecy. As I accept, those who knew God in prior close relationship even made poor choice decisions. Even with the showing in physical form, many didn't accept, so to "expose" Himself again is not quite strong enough to make man choose wisely. Self will always interfere, even with proof offered. It's a tale as old as time. His chosen people turned aside many times, just as we do today.
So to your OP, simplicity in creation proves the complexity of design. God made man in His image. He gave man a helper that came from his own body. Those birthed from original man and woman, mated to create offspring that mimicked the original creation of human from human created: Purity in original design, perhaps.
This post was edited on 6/13/25 at 10:21 pm
Page 4 of 10
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News