- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

Court Rules UVA Rape Accuser "Jackie" Must Turn Over Correspondence with RS
Posted on 1/28/16 at 11:49 am
Posted on 1/28/16 at 11:49 am
I bet Rolling Stone tries to settle. Hard. I hope UVA doesn't so we get to see how "journalism" in the social justice movement works.
AND let us all remember being called rape sympathizers and haters of women when we wanted the police to actually investigate instead of just shutting down fraternities and dragging individuals through the mud
quote:
Earlier this week, the judge in the case ordered Jackie to surrender all records of her conversations relating to the alleged sexual assault. Specifically, Jackie must provide messages she exchanged with Erdely, Rolling Stone, and UVA. The judge’s order also covers correspondence between Jackie and her friends relating to “Haven Monahan,” the fictitious person that Jackie claimed was involved in her rape.
quote:
Jackie had a crush on her friend, Ryan Duffin, and catfished him by pretending to have a fictional boyfriend, “Haven,” who sent Duffin text messages revealing Jackie’s secret desires. Since Haven does not exist, all available evidence suggests these texts were actually sent by Jackie herself. She also claimed to be suffering from a terminal illness—and that she was the victim of a horrific gang rape orchestrated by Haven.
AND let us all remember being called rape sympathizers and haters of women when we wanted the police to actually investigate instead of just shutting down fraternities and dragging individuals through the mud
Posted on 1/28/16 at 11:51 am to SlowFlowPro
Good. Hope the c unt goes to pound me in the pussy prison. And the Rolling Stone douches too.
Posted on 1/28/16 at 11:51 am to SlowFlowPro
Rolling stone may not have the money to settle. It let stories like this happen (and doing things like idolizing the Boston Bomber) because they are bleeding financially.
Posted on 1/28/16 at 11:59 am to ell_13
quote:
Rolling stone may not have the money to settle.
Bankruptcy is an acceptable outcome.
Posted on 1/28/16 at 12:02 pm to Lima Whiskey
i'm not sure, but i think if the tort is found to be intentional it's outside of bankruptcy
Posted on 1/28/16 at 12:06 pm to SlowFlowPro
Catch me up please... do we know the real identity of the accuser?
Posted on 1/28/16 at 12:06 pm to Black n Gold
yes but i believe the press is treating her like an actual rape victim and not revealing her name
This post was edited on 1/28/16 at 12:07 pm
Posted on 1/28/16 at 12:09 pm to SlowFlowPro
that's correct. Intentional tort judgments are non-dischargeable debts.
Posted on 1/28/16 at 12:12 pm to Black n Gold
quote:
Catch me up please... do we know the real identity of the accuser?
Jackie Coakley.
quote:
yes but i believe the press is treating her like an actual rape victim and not revealing her name
The Post has done the most, and the best, reporting on the scandal. Unfortunately, they signed an agreement to protect her identity at the outset. That agreement remains in effect.
This post was edited on 1/28/16 at 12:13 pm
Posted on 1/28/16 at 12:14 pm to SlowFlowPro
If Jackie didn't get raped at UVa, she will get raped in court.
Posted on 1/28/16 at 12:17 pm to FightinTigersDammit
quote:
If Jackie didn't get raped at UVa, she will get raped in court.
She'll never be held responsible in court, unfortunately.
There's no money there.
And that's what bothers me about efforts to protect her identity. The media, in effect, is letting her off the hook for her outrageous falsehoods. They're allowing her to skip out, scotch free.
Posted on 1/28/16 at 12:18 pm to Lima Whiskey
NOW is protecting her, as well. They still identify her as a sexual assault survivor.
Posted on 1/28/16 at 12:18 pm to Lima Whiskey
Because the ends justify the means to the media.
Posted on 1/28/16 at 12:22 pm to TotesMcGotes
quote:
NOW is protecting her, as well
They should be putting this count on blast, but that would involve rational thinking.
Posted on 1/28/16 at 12:24 pm to Lima Whiskey
quote:
She'll never be held responsible in court, unfortunately.
You think she won't have to testify?
Posted on 1/28/16 at 12:38 pm to Lima Whiskey
quote:
The media, in effect, is letting her off the hook for her outrageous falsehoods.
they are between a rock and a hard place so they're just pushing their heads in the sand to avoid any possibility of attacking victims
Posted on 1/28/16 at 12:54 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:So is this site. But all you have to do is google it.
yes but i believe the press is treating her like an actual rape victim and not revealing her name
And screw your German thread. German.
Posted on 1/28/16 at 12:57 pm to SlowFlowPro
I would guess behind closed doors they are furious this happened, since it will be a constantly specter over any future similar exposés. Publicly they have to toe the line though.
Posted on 1/28/16 at 1:02 pm to SlowFlowPro
Women who falsely claim rape do irreparable harm to actual rape victims. Other WOMEN should put them on blast and make it something that is absolutely not tolerated.
Posted on 1/28/16 at 1:03 pm to TheCaterpillar
i agree
but that's my white, male privilege talking
but that's my white, male privilege talking
Popular
Back to top


6





