Started By
Message

re: Court rules against Oregon bakers in wedding-cake case

Posted on 12/29/17 at 12:24 pm to
Posted by GoCrazyAuburn
Member since Feb 2010
41042 posts
Posted on 12/29/17 at 12:24 pm to
quote:

Art is protected speech, the courts don't think baking and decorating a basic wedding cake is art so it's not protected.


The courts also think how we spend our money and time is protected speech. That would apply to a business, no?
Posted by ShreveportHog94
GodBlessAmerica
Member since Nov 2006
6115 posts
Posted on 12/29/17 at 12:26 pm to
The ones on the side of the bakers are a dying breed of immoral trash. It's good our country is turning its back on trash like these bakers and their supporters.
Posted by GoCrazyAuburn
Member since Feb 2010
41042 posts
Posted on 12/29/17 at 12:27 pm to
Right. Because you're acting like such an upstanding individual
Posted by Dizz
Member since May 2008
16144 posts
Posted on 12/29/17 at 12:29 pm to
Not sure what you are getting at?
Posted by GoCrazyAuburn
Member since Feb 2010
41042 posts
Posted on 12/29/17 at 12:30 pm to
quote:

Kentucker


I appreciate the back and forth. Won't be able to be on much longer today, but I'll try and respond to anything if I can.
Posted by Kentucker
Rabbit Hash, KY
Member since Apr 2013
20055 posts
Posted on 12/29/17 at 12:32 pm to
quote:

Has nothing to do with the legality of the event, unless you are trying to argue that you can be forced to be a part of any event against your will, as long as the event is legal.


It has everything to do with the legality of the event. If you offer a service in the marketplace and a legal request is made for service then, yes, you must provide it. Unless you don't like the person, don't have the equipment to provide the service (such as needing a four-wheel drive to get somewhere) or other extenuating circumstances.

quote:

The painter doesn't have to validate anything. All they are doing is making a painting. He could make a painting of anything he wants, doesn't have to be anti-gay or anything. The only thing he is refusing is the ability to hang his product at an event he disagrees with.


Actually, he is saying that he doesn't want to say that he is anti-gay. It's a free speech event and he doesn't want to participate. He could, of course, participate and add his speech to that of the event.

quote:

Then, by your reasoning, it is okay for a business owner to discriminate against a customer's religious beliefs.


Not if he accommodates religious beliefs.
Posted by ShreveportHog94
GodBlessAmerica
Member since Nov 2006
6115 posts
Posted on 12/29/17 at 12:33 pm to
quote:

Right. Because you're acting like such an upstanding individual





Nope but it's good to be on the right side of history and knowing how to be a decent human in real life.
Posted by GoCrazyAuburn
Member since Feb 2010
41042 posts
Posted on 12/29/17 at 12:35 pm to
quote:


Nope but it's good to be on the right side of history and knowing how to be a decent human in real life.


Right. Calling people immoral trash that you've never met before is the sign of a decent human
Posted by Kentucker
Rabbit Hash, KY
Member since Apr 2013
20055 posts
Posted on 12/29/17 at 12:36 pm to
quote:

I appreciate the back and forth. Won't be able to be on much longer today, but I'll try and respond to anything if I can.


Me, too. I appreciate the civil discourse.
This post was edited on 12/29/17 at 12:38 pm
Posted by Steadyhands
Slightly above I-10
Member since May 2016
7155 posts
Posted on 12/29/17 at 12:38 pm to
quote:

Actually, he is saying that he doesn't want to say that he is anti-gay. It's a free speech event and he doesn't want to participate. He could, of course, participate and add his speech to that of the event. 


So these baker's could have showed up to the gay wedding with hats or pins antigay...and they would have been protected by free speech...
This post was edited on 12/29/17 at 12:42 pm
Posted by GoCrazyAuburn
Member since Feb 2010
41042 posts
Posted on 12/29/17 at 12:38 pm to
quote:

It has everything to do with the legality of the event. If you offer a service in the marketplace and a legal request is made for service then, yes, you must provide it. Unless you don't like the person, don't have the equipment to provide the service (such as needing a four-wheel drive to get somewhere) or other extenuating circumstances.


Like having a religious or immoral objection to the event?

quote:

Actually, he is saying that he doesn't want to say that he is anti-gay. It's a free speech event and he doesn't want to participate. He could, of course, participate and add his speech to that of the event.

And the baker, right or wrong, is saying they don't want to say they support gay marriage. It is the same issue, just switch the sides.

quote:

Not if he accommodates religious beliefs.

He is not accommodating a single religious belief here.
Posted by Dizz
Member since May 2008
16144 posts
Posted on 12/29/17 at 12:46 pm to
quote:

So these baker's could have showed up to the gay wedding with hats or pins antigay...and they would have been protected by free speech...



Absolutely, now they could have been denied entry by the venue and simply left the cake on the curb.
Posted by Kentucker
Rabbit Hash, KY
Member since Apr 2013
20055 posts
Posted on 12/29/17 at 12:46 pm to
quote:

Like having a religious or immoral objection to the event?


Religion is legal. So now are gay weddings, too. The Constitution automatically sets boundaries where these meet and each must be accommodated. The marketplace is a prime example where they meet. The Constitutional limit to religious rights comes into force here because the civil rights of the gay couple to be accommodated equally in the marketplace are in play.

quote:

And the baker, right or wrong, is saying they don't want to say they support gay marriage. It is the same issue, just switch the sides.


The baker is not right or wrong in stating their feelings about gay marriage. He is actively participating in the marketplace and he must accommodate every legal request for his service.
Posted by Kentucker
Rabbit Hash, KY
Member since Apr 2013
20055 posts
Posted on 12/29/17 at 12:53 pm to
quote:

So these baker's could have showed up to the gay wedding with hats or pins antigay...and they would have been protected by free speech...


Yes, they could but it's not wise to be that angry when you're in a crowd of your perceived opponents. Someone might decide to exercise his perceived right to flatten your tires, break your windshield or dump the cake on your head and seek to avoid the legal consequences.
Posted by ShreveportHog94
GodBlessAmerica
Member since Nov 2006
6115 posts
Posted on 12/29/17 at 1:11 pm to
If you hide behind religion as an excuse to be a bigoted scum then you are immoral
Posted by baldona
Florida
Member since Feb 2016
24205 posts
Posted on 12/29/17 at 1:20 pm to
quote:

If you hide behind religion as an excuse to be a bigoted scum then you are immoral


That's the entire premise of basic religious beliefs though. Is things that do not make common sense. So you are basically saying that there is absolutely no protections to religion.

Posted by ShreveportHog94
GodBlessAmerica
Member since Nov 2006
6115 posts
Posted on 12/29/17 at 1:45 pm to
If your religious belief interferes with the civil rights of others then no you are not protected. In fact, anyone who follows the teachings of Christ and the bible and singles out one sin that is arguably no different than eating bacon, then you are using religon to justify your prejudices.
This post was edited on 12/29/17 at 1:46 pm
Posted by mindbreaker
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2011
7915 posts
Posted on 12/29/17 at 2:56 pm to
quote:

That's the entire premise of basic religious beliefs though. Is things that do not make common sense. So you are basically saying that there is absolutely no protections to religion


Let's be real here the bakers were being prejudiced assholes. Everyone is using religious freedom to champion an issue that is a footnote in the bible. Homosexuality being so open is an new thing and people are not used to it and they find it oogie so they are assholes about it.

The problem is where do you draw the line. Are you allowed to not hire someone because they are gay because "private business" and "religious beliefs"? For what it's worth I don't necessarily think the bakers should have been fined, but if you leave the door to discrimination open just a crack assholes are going to tear the wall down rushing through it.
Posted by Cornholio
LaPlace
Member since Nov 2007
8279 posts
Posted on 12/30/17 at 1:00 pm to
quote:

It's always the ones who make minimum wage that are outspoken about how businesses should be run.



Min wage? Try again liberal dip shite.
Posted by TigerBlazer
Member since Aug 2016
840 posts
Posted on 12/30/17 at 1:06 pm to
quote:

That's the entire premise of basic religious beliefs though. Is things that do not make common sense. So you are basically saying that there is absolutely no protections to religion.


The premise is you have the right to BELIEVE what you want. When you act on those beliefs and impinge on the rights of others, that is where the problem occurs.

You can believe in a zombie cannibal god but you can not eat the flesh of other people bc you would commit murder in doning so.
Jump to page
Page First 9 10 11 12
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 11 of 12Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram