- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Carolyn Bryant Donham, whose accusations led to murder of Emmett Till, dies at 88
Posted on 4/27/23 at 8:37 pm to lsupride87
Posted on 4/27/23 at 8:37 pm to lsupride87
quote:
Someone from MS so he clearly understands the intricacies and references and historical context of MS
This isn't a complete sentence.
Oh now I see. You were answering my previous question, unlike any of the other questions I've posed, such as the difference between qualities of testimonies, etc. I guess you can only answer what you can handle, poor thing.
If you have read anything about Reconstruction, none of what I'm referencing is actually obscure.
This post was edited on 4/27/23 at 8:40 pm
Posted on 4/27/23 at 8:39 pm to crazy4lsu
It’s referenced to historical context relating to specific Mississippi things though
Posted on 4/27/23 at 8:41 pm to lsupride87
quote:
It’s referenced to historical context relating to specific Mississippi things though
Lol, do you want a reading list? It's probably above your grade level, but if you use your finger as a pacer, you can definitely sound out some of the words.
Posted on 4/27/23 at 8:42 pm to lsupride87
quote:
I didn’t know who Till or Wallen were until this week
Posted on 4/27/23 at 8:45 pm to MetroAtlantaGatorFan
Watch out, he's going to call you names because he can't see how terrible his arguments have been in this thread. You see, he was being sarcastic there, and it wasn't a real indication of his real lack of knowledge. He knows all about Donham's testimony, and believes it despite the fact that she recanted some extremely relevant parts, and thus he knows that she is an angel who never meant for her husband to murder Till, who possibly had it coming because he whistled, which is the only thing all the witnesses agree on (other than no one supporting Donham's version of events with regards to the accosting, the screaming she supposedly did, the SIL who she referenced as being there that evening despite that SIL's own testimony, and on and on).
Posted on 4/27/23 at 8:48 pm to crazy4lsu
quote:your ridiculous emotional tantrum lying is coming through thick now. Not a single person has even remotely said or hinted at this. No need to lie again MD, although that has become quite the norm in your profession when you need the dumb masses to get in line
who possibly had it coming because he whistled
Posted on 4/27/23 at 8:49 pm to lsupride87
Aren't you the guy always defending the Oregon State pedo pitcher too? 
Posted on 4/27/23 at 8:55 pm to lsupride87
quote:
your ridiculous emotional tantrum lying is coming through thick now. Not a single person has even remotely said or hinted at this.
quote:
Or do you think he did absolutely NOTHING and he was randomly picked for the brutal murder?
Of course, we have to reference things the suffragists suffered in Virginia and not, you know, the treatment of African-American men in the literal same month as Till's murder. You said that you had extreme confidence that Till did something, but no one else supports Donham's exact characterization of events. Donham even changed her testimony later. So what should we suspect here?
Posted on 4/27/23 at 8:58 pm to crazy4lsu
Once again, where did I say “he had it coming”? My only question to that poster was does he believe Till did absolutely nothing? Because he seemed to take issue with me saying till MAY have whistled or done something else, as I said verbatim, HARMLESS
Posted on 4/27/23 at 9:00 pm to lsupride87
quote:
Once again, where did I say “he had it coming”? My only question to that poster was does he believe Till did absolutely nothing? Because he seemed to take issue with me saying till MAY have whistled or done something else, as I said verbatim, HARMLESS
quote:
This isn’t say what he did deserved anything close to what happened to him, but it’s a real stretch to try and say he didn’t do a single thing that day
What nuance. You really captured the spirit of those 1955 times by white-knighting for a white woman without even questioning her own testimony. Nicely done dumbass.
Posted on 4/27/23 at 9:02 pm to MetroAtlantaGatorFan
quote:
Aren't you the guy always defending the Oregon State pedo pitcher too?
Pride also believes he’s some kind of “Data Scientist” too, and “models” hospital data using Excel spreadsheets
Posted on 4/27/23 at 9:02 pm to crazy4lsu
quote:I actually said Donham likely lied in her testimony on stand
What nuance. You really captured the spirit of those 1955 times by white-knighting for a white woman without even questioning her own testimony. Nicely done dumbass.
Lie number 2 from you about me and what I have said in here. You are unraveling
Posted on 4/27/23 at 9:04 pm to Breauxsif
quote:
Pride also believes he’s some kind of “Data Scientist” too, and “models” hospital data using Excel spreadsheets
Oh I'm well aware of his spreadsheet gimmick on the MSB.
Posted on 4/27/23 at 9:06 pm to lsupride87
quote:
I actually said Donham likely lied in her testimony on stand
But you also said that, based on her 1955 statements that she didn't want to tell her husband that 'To me, her not telling her husband about whatever happened in the store shows me where here actual moral compass was' which isn't supported by her own statements. God damn you are dim.
Posted on 4/27/23 at 9:09 pm to crazy4lsu
This thread, like most of the board, is like a collection of the opposite of beautiful minds.
Posted on 4/27/23 at 9:11 pm to SlimTigerSlap
quote:
I wonder if they'd hang a bitch for attempting to use her right to vote.
No, they would not have. They would have beaten her husband. And if he didn’t get the message they would have killed him discreetly and disposed of his body. If she was not married, they would have looked to her father to send a message. You will have to do a ton of digging to find this, but the Ku Klux Klan killed more white people than they did black people.
This of course would have been early on after the suffrage movement. People, and especially institutions of power, are very resistant to change.
BTW, I bet you call lots of women bitches. I bet that makes balancing on that soap box awfully difficult.
Posted on 4/27/23 at 9:13 pm to captdalton
quote:
No, they would not have. They would have beaten her husband. And if he didn’t get the message they would have killed him discreetly and disposed of his body. If she was not married, they would have looked to her father to send a message. You will have to do a ton of digging to find this, but the Ku Klux Klan killed more white people than they did black people.
God this is beautiful.
Posted on 4/27/23 at 9:22 pm to OweO
quote:
This thread, like most of the board, is like a collection of the opposite of beautiful minds. But with functional legs.
You do realize that “A Beautiful Mind” was a true life movie about a schizophrenic that had to be committed to a mental institution right? He was only released after electrotherapy, an insane amount of psychoactive prescription drugs, and old age kept him from being viewed as a threat any longer. I am not sure that telling someone they aren’t certifiably insane is the insult you meant it to be.
Popular
Back to top


1





