Started By
Message

re: Carbon storage

Posted on 5/29/24 at 8:57 am to
Posted by ragincajun03
Member since Nov 2007
27083 posts
Posted on 5/29/24 at 8:57 am to
quote:

The companies we talked to said it would make exploratory drilling much more costly and not worth it. But in developmental drilling, you know what the revenue v. costs will be, so they can design for it.


Makes sense. Yeah, you’d probably avoid an exploration type deal and not spend that extra money on drill design with the risk of drilling a dry hole.
Posted by Sidicous
NELA
Member since Aug 2015
19296 posts
Posted on 5/29/24 at 8:58 am to
quote:

Why store something that nature naturally converts to oxygen?


Well, my bowels are a carbon capture device and I can assure you there's very little oxygen involved.
Posted by RaginRampage
Detroit Lions Fan
Member since Feb 2018
270 posts
Posted on 5/29/24 at 9:05 am to
quote:

lawyer or landman take a look


I imagine the company has a landman firm approaching them, and not the company dealing with the landowner directly. I would get a different landman firm/lawyer to represent you, not just trust everything their representation is saying. They only get paid if they close the deal!

quote:

assuming they want to drill an injection well on your property


I doubt the well will be on their actual property. The company is likely leasing their underground pore space. 20 acres is not much. There is likely several other land owners in the area that are also being leased, then they will be pooled together into something similar to a "Drilling Unit". If the well would be on their property, they would be dealing with a surface lease, which has an annual rental, with some sort of increase per year for inflation, as long as O&G activity is ongoing.

In O&G, if you refuse to lease, and the operator forms a unit with your acreage, you will be "force pooled" and have to share a proportional share of the drilling cost, and be treated as a partner. I would be curious of the repercussions if you were to do this on an injection well, if the results are the same.
This post was edited on 5/29/24 at 9:09 am
Posted by ragincajun03
Member since Nov 2007
27083 posts
Posted on 5/29/24 at 9:23 am to
quote:

In O&G, if you refuse to lease, and the operator forms a unit with your acreage, you will be "force pooled" and have to share a proportional share of the drilling cost, and be treated as a partner.


In Louisiana, though, unless some other states, I believe you have to have at least 80% of the mineral interest within the unit leased, or else you may have drilled all the mineral servitude owners a free well. Oops!

quote:

I would be curious of the repercussions if you were to do this on an injection well, if the results are the same.


Due to HB 661 passed in 2009 Regular Session, then singed into law as Act 517, there is supposed to be a process for expropriation of pore-space for an underground CO2 storage complex.

Now…whether the LA DNR had figured out 15 years later how in actual practice such a process would be initiated and carried out…who the hell knows.

Your advice about getting separate representation by somebody familiar specifically with sequestration agreements and the process is something OP definitely needs to adhere to.
This post was edited on 5/29/24 at 9:25 am
Posted by kftiger1
Lake Charles
Member since Sep 2008
177 posts
Posted on 5/29/24 at 9:38 am to
quote:

RaginCajun03


Thank you
Posted by jlsufan
Baton Rouge
Member since May 2021
385 posts
Posted on 5/29/24 at 5:57 pm to
we were approached but did not do a deal...the initial offer was:

$350/acre (not a joke) for lease consideration (i.e. signing bonus)

a primary term of 10 years during which we'd get $75/acre annual lease payment until injection commenced

once injection starts, $1.50/metric ton CO2 injected

hope that helps
Posted by LegendInMyMind
Member since Apr 2019
70936 posts
Posted on 5/29/24 at 6:37 pm to
Maybe this is a dumb question, but how will this effect the sale and possible development of land in the future? Would there be restrictions on development?
Posted by Bmath
LA
Member since Aug 2010
18841 posts
Posted on 5/29/24 at 6:40 pm to
quote:

Why store something that nature naturally converts to oxygen?


Plants use CO2 to make food. Oxygen comes from splitting apart H2O.
Posted by ragincajun03
Member since Nov 2007
27083 posts
Posted on 5/30/24 at 7:45 am to
quote:

Maybe this is a dumb question, but how will this effect the sale and possible development of land in the future? Would there be restrictions on development?


I don’t think it’s a dumb question at all, because to be honest…no one knows. Carrying out projects like this on such a large scale is in its infancy.

I will say this, people have homes and shops on land that has CO2 flooding for EOR oil & gas operations right under. However, it’s not like your suburban or RiverRanch type housing.

For the most part, it seems the smart companies wanting to get involved in these projects have shied away from highly populated regions or potentially high dollar development properties, at least along the Gulf Coast. They instead done deals with big timberland property owners, ranches, etc.

Of course, Air Products really stepped into a shitstorm doing a deal with LA DNR to store CO2 under Lake Maurepas.
Posted by ragincajun03
Member since Nov 2007
27083 posts
Posted on 5/30/24 at 7:47 am to
quote:

primary term of 10 years


Wow.

What part of the country, if you don’t mind sharing?
Posted by jlsufan
Baton Rouge
Member since May 2021
385 posts
Posted on 5/30/24 at 8:40 am to
Louisiana
Posted by White Bear
SPECULATION
Member since Jul 2014
17121 posts
Posted on 5/30/24 at 8:48 am to
quote:

In O&G, if you refuse to lease, and the operator forms a unit with your acreage, you will be "force pooled" and have to share a proportional share of the drilling cost, and be treated as a partner.
An unleased mineral owner in La does not have to participate in drilling costs but will not get revenue until after well payout. Once the well pays out the UMI owner will usually begin receiving (monthly) revenue and expense charges via JIBs (joint interest bills) related to the UMI.

Pertaining to the OP, no way I’m encumbering my property for this carbon shite esp for 10 yrs. That deal doesn’t pass the laugh out loud test.
This post was edited on 5/30/24 at 8:50 am
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram