- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- SEC Score Board
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Can you teach a child morality without religion?
Posted on 11/2/18 at 11:56 am to WaWaWeeWa
Posted on 11/2/18 at 11:56 am to WaWaWeeWa
quote:
This is the worst possible argument I’ve heard. You are a product of society regardless of your personal beliefs. You didn’t develop in a vacuum. A society which was founded on certain moral principles based on a Judeo-Christian worldview.
You can’t disconnect yourself from this structure that has molded you.
I get what you're saying but nearly every religion has similar rules for moral living. These rules didn't just come by happenstance. Not killing each other is biologically good for the species, same with greed, gluttony, etc. As a community organism it's best for the species as a whole if everyone follows these rules. The Golden rule dates back to at least ancient Egypt roughly 4,000 years ago and, yes it was tied to religion at the time, but if you raised a child in a completely insulated way where no one had any concept of religion the child could still be perfectly moral if they follow that one guideline. By your logic it's impossible for morality to be separated from religion because nearly every moral tenet is in some form of religion and the religion was likely the first time it was codified.
Posted on 11/2/18 at 1:55 pm to MLCLyons
quote:
I get what you're saying but nearly every religion has similar rules for moral living. These rules didn't just come by happenstance. Not killing each other is biologically good for the species, same with greed, gluttony, etc. As a community organism it's best for the species as a whole if everyone follows these rules. The Golden rule dates back to at least ancient Egypt roughly 4,000 years ago and, yes it was tied to religion at the time, but if you raised a child in a completely insulated way where no one had any concept of religion the child could still be perfectly moral if they follow that one guideline. By your logic it's impossible for morality to be separated from religion because nearly every moral tenet is in some form of religion and the religion was likely the first time it was codified.
The Egyptian golden rule you referenced and the golden rule of Christianity while similar in language are vastly different in their implication and call for ways to live. One is an eye for an eye, one is to treat others how you would want to be treated.
All religions are not the same... is the morality taught by Muhammad the same as that of Jesus?
If morality is imprinted on all people by a higher power, it would make sense that people have similar values and codes of conduct on the big items across different cultures. If there is no higher power, then morality is nothing more than a societal accident that individuals should ignore when its inconvenient.
For the atheist, Hitler and Mother Teresa are equals. The goodness of Mother Teresa is an empty goodness devoid of meaning. The atrocities of Hitler is an empty wrong devoid of any consequence. In such a worldview, morality is dead, whether or not you deny that truth.
Posted on 11/2/18 at 1:58 pm to CivilTiger83
quote:
For the atheist, Hitler and Mother Teresa are equals. The goodness of Mother Teresa is an empty goodness devoid of meaning. The atrocities of Hitler is an empty wrong devoid of any consequence. In such a worldview, morality is dead, whether or not you deny that truth.
Ignoring that Mother Teresa is a terrible example of 'good', you're confusing atheism with nihilism.
Posted on 11/2/18 at 2:05 pm to colorchangintiger
quote:
Ignoring that Mother Teresa is a terrible example of 'good', you're confusing atheism with nihilism.
Someone who cared for the sick and poor is a terrible example of good?
Nihilism is the logical outworking of atheism. Nihilists are what I would call honest atheists.
Edit: To speak on this further... a quote from someone on the Dawkins forum that I think is well said.
Dawkins Site Poster on Atheism vs Nihilism
quote:
If you don't believe in a creator or divine plan and you understand how our minds and emotions have evolved as chemical signals and electrical pulses then where do you fit the meaning in to this? I enjoy being alive and live as hedonistic lifestyle as possible yet I am under no illusion that this has any meaning outside of my own mind. I believe that when living memories of myself die then my existence is erased entirely, in a few billion years that anything that ever happened on Earth won’t matter, the universe will continue regardless and nothing will have any more significance than if the Earth hadn't existed at all.
That is called being honest about the conclusions of your worldview. If you want to dress it up in fluffy sounding language about the advancement of mankind that is still meaningless in light of your worldview, go ahead. It doesn't mean you are following the logical end of your worldview.
This post was edited on 11/2/18 at 2:10 pm
Posted on 11/2/18 at 2:10 pm to CivilTiger83
quote:
Someone who cared for the sick and poor is a terrible example of good?
She solicited millions, maybe billions, in donations to her charity and then denied proper medical treatment to patients in her care.
Posted on 11/2/18 at 2:25 pm to CivilTiger83
quote:
If you want to dress it up in fluffy sounding language about the advancement of mankind that is still meaningless in light of your worldview, go ahead. It doesn't mean you are following the logical end of your worldview.
Sure, ultimately the universe will die and it won't matter to universe. But we're here now and I want to live my best life. I also want my kids and grandkids to live their best life. So it matters to me, now. So be it if I'm just a bag of meat made to propagate a DNA sequence. I'm going to have fun and experience love while I'm at it.
Posted on 11/2/18 at 2:26 pm to colorchangintiger
quote:
She solicited millions, maybe billions, in donations to her charity and then denied proper medical treatment to patients in her care.
That is a silly mischaracterization if ever I heard one.
It doesn't change the argument... pick the good person of your choice.
Under your worldview, Hitler suffers no worse a fate than a good person. In fact, many good people and innocent children have suffered terrible fates. There is no ultimate justice. Morality is a social construct. Those are the conclusions you must come to if you are honest with your belief in no higher power.
Posted on 11/2/18 at 2:35 pm to LandPhil
I've raised two children without religion. They are both moral, upstanding citizens that have never been in any trouble.
Unfortunately, I can't say the same for some of their more religious friends.
Unfortunately, I can't say the same for some of their more religious friends.
Posted on 11/2/18 at 2:43 pm to CivilTiger83
quote:
That is a silly mischaracterization if ever I heard one.
quote:
In 1991, Robin Fox, editor of the British medical journal The Lancet visited the Home for Dying Destitutes in Calcutta (now Kolkata) and described the medical care the patients received as "haphazard".[4] He observed that sisters and volunteers, some of whom had no medical knowledge, had to make decisions about patient care, because of the lack of doctors in the hospice. Fox specifically held Teresa responsible for conditions in this home, and observed that her order did not distinguish between curable and incurable patients, so that people who could otherwise survive would be at risk of dying from infections and lack of treatment.
quote:
Fox also wrote that needles were rinsed with warm water, which left them inadequately sterilised, and that the facility did not isolate patients with tuberculosis. There have been a series of other reports documenting inattention to medical care in the order's facilities. Similar points of view have also been expressed by some former volunteers who worked for Teresa's order. Mother Teresa herself referred to the facilities as "Houses of the Dying".
quote:
In 2013, in a comprehensive review[6] covering 96% of the literature on Mother Teresa, a group of Université de Montréal academics reinforced the foregoing criticism, detailing, among other issues, the missionary's practice of "caring for the sick by glorifying their suffering instead of relieving it, … her questionable political contacts, her suspicious management of the enormous sums of money she received, and her overly dogmatic views regarding, in particular, abortion, contraception, and divorce". Questioning the Vatican's motivations for ignoring the mass of criticism, the study concluded that Mother Teresa's "hallowed image—which does not stand up to analysis of the facts—was constructed, and that her beatification was orchestrated by an effective media relations campaign" engineered by the Catholic convert and anti-abortion BBC journalist Malcolm Muggeridge.
quote:
After Indian Prime Minister Indira Gandhi's suspension of civil liberties in 1975, Mother Teresa said: "People are happier. There are more jobs. There are no strikes."
quote:
She supported Licio Gelli's nomination for the Nobel Prize in Literature. Gelli was known for being the head of the Propaganda Due masonic lodge, which was implicated in various murders and high-profile corruption cases in Italy, as well as having close connections with the neo-fascist Italian Social Movement and the Argentine Military Junta.
quote:
"Sixty Minutes" showed film footage of her on that occasion singing the praises of Michele Duvalier, the wife of Haitian dictator Jean-Claude "Baby Doc" Duvalier. Mother Teresa said that while she had met kings and presidents aplenty in her time, she had "never seen the poor people being so familiar with their head of state as they were with her. It was a beautiful lesson for me." Thereafter, Mother Teresa was awarded the Haitian Legion d'honneur.
In case you don't know who Baby Doc is:
quote:
Thousands of Haitians were killed or tortured, and hundreds of thousands fled the country during his presidency. He maintained a notoriously lavish lifestyle (including a state-sponsored US$?3 million wedding in 1980) while poverty among his people remained the most widespread of any country in the Western Hemisphere.
Posted on 11/2/18 at 2:48 pm to Green Chili Tiger
quote:
I've raised two children without religion.
They are both moral, upstanding citizens that have never been in any trouble.
Green Chili Tiger, nobody is saying agnostics/atheists are incapable of teaching their children morality. I am sure you did a great job with your kids.
The main argument is if there is a logical basis for absolute morality if there is no higher power. If morality is just a social construct that has evolved from nothing, then morality is just a tool to get what you want. Whether or not you act morally is meaningless.
Posted on 11/2/18 at 2:52 pm to colorchangintiger
Colorchangin, that sounds like someone who was understaffed and helping the poor with the limited resources relative to the need at hand.
Have you ever been to India, particularly in that time period? Do you understand what kind of daily conditions those people live in? Walking in and saying, "your care of indigent people doesn't meet Western standards!" and condemning all she did is just silly. I have no dog in the Mother Teresa hunt either way... This is a strange hill to camp on. Like I said, pick your good person and the example stands.
Have you ever been to India, particularly in that time period? Do you understand what kind of daily conditions those people live in? Walking in and saying, "your care of indigent people doesn't meet Western standards!" and condemning all she did is just silly. I have no dog in the Mother Teresa hunt either way... This is a strange hill to camp on. Like I said, pick your good person and the example stands.
Posted on 11/2/18 at 8:21 pm to LandPhil
There is this thing called "Natural Law".... even if you don't believe in God there is a law that applies to all equally.
Alas, this is a deep rabbit hole where truth may be found. The bigger question is does God exist?
Alas, this is a deep rabbit hole where truth may be found. The bigger question is does God exist?
Posted on 11/2/18 at 8:22 pm to LandPhil
There is this thing called "Natural Law".... even if you don't believe in God there is a law that applies to all equally.
Alas, this is a deep rabbit hole where truth may be found. The bigger question is does God exist?
Alas, this is a deep rabbit hole where truth may be found. The bigger question is does God exist?
Posted on 11/2/18 at 9:09 pm to MLCLyons
quote:
. By your logic it's impossible for morality to be separated from religion because nearly every moral tenet is in some form of religion and the religion was likely the first time it was codified
That’s not my point
I’m not arguing where morals came from. My point is maybe religion (even if it’s not true) is the best way to have a moral structure to society that can’t be manipulated by man. Maybe it’s the best way to teach and maintain morals.
I don’t know the answer to these questions, but to assume that everyone will be moral and those morals will be good without the idea of a higher power is very naive.
Posted on 11/2/18 at 9:14 pm to Green Chili Tiger
quote:
I've raised two children without religion. They are both moral, upstanding citizens that have never been in any trouble.
You haven’t proven anything
You raised them in a longstanding society founded on religious principles that has lead to one of the safest, most peaceful civilizations in history. How can you be so naive to think you did everything?
The bottom line is the OPs question is meaningless. The real question is can you develop a moral society that functions like ours without religion
Posted on 11/2/18 at 9:23 pm to WaWaWeeWa
quote:
I’m not arguing where morals came from. My point is maybe religion (even if it’s not true) is the best way to have a moral structure to society that can’t be manipulated by man. Maybe it’s the best way to teach and maintain morals.
There are actually studies going on to determine if morality (or what we consider moral behavior) is, in fact, innate. By looking at particular sectors of the brain when discussing moral or immoral choices, scientists can clearly see the brain react. If our brains can chemically decipher "right" from "wrong", it stands to reason these signatures could be there from the day we're born.
A dog tucks its tail between its legs when it knows it's done something wrong or to disobey you. It has no idea what morality is. It doesn't know what religion is. A 3 year old lies when she knows she's done something she shouldn't have. Why does she lie? Because of God?
We're pre-wired. No amount of religion can rewire the morality in our brains, nor can any deficit of religion bring about immorality in our brains.
I'm an atheist who has lived a good, moral life. I don't believe in "God" or "Jesus", nor any other religion. That said, I do respect those who internalize religiosity to keep themselves on the right path. Key word is "internalize"....you do you, I'll do me. Statements like yours are very insulting to those of us who do not subscribe to any religion.
Posted on 11/2/18 at 9:40 pm to mmmmmbeeer
quote:
Statements like yours are very insulting to those of us who do not subscribe to any religion.
I’m barely religious. I’m just saying you have no proof that a society can function well and with morality without religion or some belief in a higher power. Whether or not morality is biological is irrelevant to my argument.
Posted on 11/2/18 at 9:43 pm to LandPhil
quote:
Can you teach a child morality without religion?
Yes, but it requires making the child understand why morals are important, where they originated, and the parent must follow those morals in their own life.
Posted on 11/2/18 at 9:43 pm to mmmmmbeeer
To answer the question in the OP
Yes you can teach a kid morals without religion..... In a society founded and operating on religious moral principles.
That’s all we have proven.
Can you develop and sustain that same society without religion is another question. And the more important question.
Neitzsche didn’t think so
Yes you can teach a kid morals without religion..... In a society founded and operating on religious moral principles.
That’s all we have proven.
Can you develop and sustain that same society without religion is another question. And the more important question.
Neitzsche didn’t think so
This post was edited on 11/2/18 at 9:45 pm
Posted on 11/2/18 at 9:46 pm to WaWaWeeWa
But isn't society itself a sort of "higher power"?
There was a philosopher (can't remember his name) who likened society to a prison. The edges of acceptable societal behavior are lined with razor wire and armed guards, keeping most of us well contained within its constraints. I don't necessarily buy into his theory but it does help to explain why we don't need a God when we have society keeping us in check.
There was a philosopher (can't remember his name) who likened society to a prison. The edges of acceptable societal behavior are lined with razor wire and armed guards, keeping most of us well contained within its constraints. I don't necessarily buy into his theory but it does help to explain why we don't need a God when we have society keeping us in check.
Popular
Back to top


2





