Started By
Message

re: Can this 747 take off?

Posted on 4/11/24 at 1:32 pm to
Posted by sidewalkside
rent free in yo head
Member since Sep 2021
4597 posts
Posted on 4/11/24 at 1:32 pm to
Wrong. If the treadmill is going 100 mph in the opposite direction of the plane that is also traveling 100 mph then the plane will remain in a fixed relative location and there wont be any wind/lift on the wings
Posted by LNCHBOX
70448
Member since Jun 2009
89065 posts
Posted on 4/11/24 at 1:33 pm to
quote:

What do you do for a living, Chief?


I'm an engineer.

quote:

n my world, details matter


Doesn't seem like it.
quote:

You made an assumption that was not introduced into the parameters of the question.


Ok, if the plane does not use its engines to take off, the plane will not take off. Happy?
Posted by TD422
Destrehan, LA
Member since Jun 2019
867 posts
Posted on 4/11/24 at 1:34 pm to
What about my earlier question? When you run on a treadmill, do you feel air blowing in your face? You're "thrusting" forward by running. Doesn't mean you're moving forward relative to the ground.
Posted by LNCHBOX
70448
Member since Jun 2009
89065 posts
Posted on 4/11/24 at 1:34 pm to
quote:

If the treadmill is going 100 mph in the opposite direction of the plane that is also traveling 100 mph then the plane will remain in a fixed relative location


No it won't because the force of the treadmill will not be applied on the plane in such a way that would cancel out the force of thrust.
Posted by LNCHBOX
70448
Member since Jun 2009
89065 posts
Posted on 4/11/24 at 1:35 pm to
quote:

When you run on a treadmill


Completely unrelated to the physics of a plane.
quote:

You're "thrusting" forward by running. Doesn't mean you're moving forward relative to the ground.
Posted by sidewalkside
rent free in yo head
Member since Sep 2021
4597 posts
Posted on 4/11/24 at 1:36 pm to
This is my point exactly. When running on a treadmill or riding a stationary bike you do not feel wind blowing on your face because you are remaining in a fixed relative location.
Posted by Volvagia
Fort Worth
Member since Mar 2006
53361 posts
Posted on 4/11/24 at 1:37 pm to
quote:

What about my earlier question? When you run on a treadmill, do you feel air blowing in your face? You're "thrusting" forward by running. Doesn't mean you're moving forward relative to the ground.


I’m pressing against the ground trying to move.

The “ground” is moving to counter it.

Not sure why you think that is analogous to pressing against the air and expecting the motion of the ground.

Also, not sure why you would expect a stationary object to perceive a motion through the air.

You know, for a physics based subject, these are important “details”
Posted by LNCHBOX
70448
Member since Jun 2009
89065 posts
Posted on 4/11/24 at 1:37 pm to
quote:

When running on a treadmill or riding a stationary bike you do not feel wind blowing on your face because you are remaining in a fixed relative location.


Put a jet pack on and turn it on and you'll feel some wind on your face.
Posted by tigerfoot
Alexandria
Member since Sep 2006
61391 posts
Posted on 4/11/24 at 1:38 pm to
quote:

Again, this was physically tried!
by who?
Posted by meansonny
ATL
Member since Sep 2012
26759 posts
Posted on 4/11/24 at 1:38 pm to
quote:

Wrong. If the treadmill is going 100 mph in the opposite direction of the plane that is also traveling 100 mph then the plane will remain in a fixed relative location and there wont be any wind/lift on the wings


You are confusing the speed of the wheels with the speed of the plane.

Planes can fly with wheels not moving at all because the thrust of the engine is on the atmosphere (no trust to the wheels).

The wheels are irrelevant to flight.

Posted by Volvagia
Fort Worth
Member since Mar 2006
53361 posts
Posted on 4/11/24 at 1:38 pm to
quote:

Wrong. If the treadmill is going 100 mph in the opposite direction of the plane that is also traveling 100 mph then the plane will remain in a fixed relative location and there wont be any wind/lift on the wings


Why? The plane is still having a 100 mph airspeed.

It just has a 200 mph ground speed now.

I mean you do realize planes track both, right?

Because they are typically different?
Posted by tigerfoot
Alexandria
Member since Sep 2006
61391 posts
Posted on 4/11/24 at 1:39 pm to
quote:

Put a jet pack on and turn it on and you'll feel some wind on your face.
because you will exceed the speed of the belt?
Posted by TD422
Destrehan, LA
Member since Jun 2019
867 posts
Posted on 4/11/24 at 1:39 pm to
quote:

I'm an engineer.



Wow, I could just sense it. Engineers are NEVER wrong. Ask me how I know. (Psst....it's 35 years in construction trades).

Make some assumptions that everyone is on the same page with you, in your next set of specs. The bidders will LOVE you.
Posted by LNCHBOX
70448
Member since Jun 2009
89065 posts
Posted on 4/11/24 at 1:40 pm to
quote:


Wow, I could just sense it. Engineers are NEVER wrong. Ask me how I know. (Psst....it's 35 years in construction trades).


Awww someone is mad they couldn't make the grades to be the PE.
quote:

Make some assumptions that everyone is on the same page with you, in your next set of specs. The bidders will LOVE you.

Yea, you big mad. Contractors never ever frick up
Posted by DavidTheGnome
Monroe
Member since Apr 2015
31513 posts
Posted on 4/11/24 at 1:41 pm to
quote:

Why? The plane is still having a 100 mph airspeed.

It just has a 200 mph ground speed now.




Wrong on both counts. If the treadmill is going in the opposite direction it has zero ground speed and thus zero airspeed. No air is flowing over the wings since the plane is stationary in space (even though the wheels are turning), so no lift, so no flight.
Posted by Volvagia
Fort Worth
Member since Mar 2006
53361 posts
Posted on 4/11/24 at 1:42 pm to
quote:

Engineers are NEVER wrong. Ask me how I know.


Oh, you can go right to hell right here.

This has gone on for pages and pages and he didn’t bring it up until YOU tried to make YOUR career relevant, Mr detail oriented.
So your career bolsters the value of your opinion, but is meaningless for his?

That’s the type of arse backwards thinking needed to think a belt can stop a plane from taking off



Posted by tigerfoot
Alexandria
Member since Sep 2006
61391 posts
Posted on 4/11/24 at 1:42 pm to
quote:

Are you talking about the Mythbusters video?
He probably is.

Show me where they measured to speed of the wheels, they did not. The wheels in their experiment were moving faster than the belt.
Posted by TD422
Destrehan, LA
Member since Jun 2019
867 posts
Posted on 4/11/24 at 1:43 pm to
Again, assumptions. I am neither an engineer wannabe or a contractor.

Assumptions AND arrogance. Yeah, your an engineer alright.
Posted by meansonny
ATL
Member since Sep 2012
26759 posts
Posted on 4/11/24 at 1:43 pm to
quote:

because you will exceed the speed of the belt?


You could put a regulator on the wheels so that they do not exceed the speed of the belt.
And the jet pack will still push you forward so you feel wind in your face.
Posted by LNCHBOX
70448
Member since Jun 2009
89065 posts
Posted on 4/11/24 at 1:43 pm to
quote:

Show me where they measured to speed of the wheels, they did not. The wheels in their experiment were moving faster than the belt.


Flat earther mad the experiment didn't go the way he thought.
Jump to page
Page First 13 14 15 16 17 ... 26
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 15 of 26Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram