Started By
Message

Can I shoot an armed gunman in the back as he's running away?

Posted on 11/23/16 at 6:55 pm
Posted by Tarik One
Member since May 2016
2094 posts
Posted on 11/23/16 at 6:55 pm
And get away with it?

For instance, some thug robs me at gunpoint, takes my shyt and runs off before I'm able to grab my glock. Is there a way I can blast him in the back and claim self-defense or stand your ground or at least spin it to appear that was the case?

A co-worker of mines got robbed after she left a party over the weekend and it's gotten me curious.
Posted by QuietTiger
New Orleans
Member since Dec 2003
26256 posts
Posted on 11/23/16 at 6:56 pm to
I would say no.
Posted by LSUAlum2001
Stavro Mueller Beta
Member since Aug 2003
47135 posts
Posted on 11/23/16 at 6:56 pm to
Shoot him in the arse.
Posted by AnOddDevice
Member since Apr 2016
215 posts
Posted on 11/23/16 at 6:57 pm to
In some cases, you can shoot a fleeing felon in the back. Lots of provisions though.

I think the case is Tennessee v. Conner (or Connor).
Posted by HogBalls
Member since Nov 2014
8591 posts
Posted on 11/23/16 at 6:57 pm to
Only if you want a load blasted on your back for the next 30 years.
Posted by jacquespene8
Nashville, TN
Member since Sep 2007
4144 posts
Posted on 11/23/16 at 6:58 pm to
No.
Posted by Roman Candle Tag
Member since Mar 2016
1450 posts
Posted on 11/23/16 at 6:58 pm to
On his back? I don't they would be so kind as to pull out.
Posted by 4LSU2
Member since Dec 2009
37341 posts
Posted on 11/23/16 at 6:58 pm to
Glock, no.

1911, sure.
Posted by athenslife101
Member since Feb 2013
18575 posts
Posted on 11/23/16 at 6:58 pm to
Am I mistaken in that Tennessee vs Connor/Garner only applies to law enforcement?
Posted by bayoutiger504
LA
Member since Jul 2012
200 posts
Posted on 11/23/16 at 6:58 pm to
Legally any shot in the back shows they were fleeing thus any threat would be considered over.....but I'd still prolly shoot with all the adrenaline pumping!
Posted by Langland
Trumplandia
Member since Apr 2014
15382 posts
Posted on 11/23/16 at 6:58 pm to
Not now. It sounds premeditated. Never research murder on the internet. That's how they get you.
Posted by LSUTigersVCURams
Member since Jul 2014
21940 posts
Posted on 11/23/16 at 6:59 pm to
You can't shoot anybody in the back dummy.
Posted by AnOddDevice
Member since Apr 2016
215 posts
Posted on 11/23/16 at 6:59 pm to
quote:

Am I mistaken in that Tennessee vs Connor/Garner only applies to law enforcement?
You may be right.

In fact I think you are.
Posted by Boxcar
Richmond VA
Member since Mar 2016
900 posts
Posted on 11/23/16 at 7:01 pm to
Your thinking Graham vs Conner.
Posted by TidenUP
Dauphin Island
Member since Apr 2011
14434 posts
Posted on 11/23/16 at 7:02 pm to
Just shoot them in the leg til they turn around
Posted by athenslife101
Member since Feb 2013
18575 posts
Posted on 11/23/16 at 7:02 pm to
Well, if you have reasonable suspicion that a man is about to cause harm to others, it's a very grey area.
Posted by windshieldman
Member since Nov 2012
12818 posts
Posted on 11/23/16 at 7:03 pm to
There is only one area you can shoot someone and get away from it 100%
Posted by Fusaichi Pegasus
Meh He Co
Member since Oct 2010
14567 posts
Posted on 11/23/16 at 7:04 pm to
Shoot him in the back
Then flip.him.over and shoot him in the chest same distance
Posted by EA6B
TX
Member since Dec 2012
14754 posts
Posted on 11/23/16 at 7:12 pm to
In Texas you could likely get away with it, since the Joe Horn incident.

LINK

"•Enrique Recio III, a 23-year-old Texas State University student wrecked his car in a northwest Austin neighborhood around 3 a.m. in early February.
Fred Yazdi, 47, found Recio hiding under his wife’s car in their driveway. “If you flee, I’m going to shoot you,” Yazdi said, according to police, and when Recio tried to run Yazdi shot him three times.
Now Yazdi is facing murder charges in WIlliamson County, but District Attorney John Bradley has said the grand jury will have to consider the case in light of Texas’ castle doctrine protections.

Posted by TigernMS12
Member since Jan 2013
5531 posts
Posted on 11/23/16 at 7:19 pm to
quote:

I think the case is Tennessee v. Conner (or Connor).


It's Tenn. v. Garner, and that case was limited to LE use of force, not civilian.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram