- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
2
Posted on 3/20/16 at 5:28 pm to Kcrad
It wouldn't be CIA on US soil.
Most likely mercs working for DoD or NSA.
Most likely mercs working for DoD or NSA.
Posted on 3/20/16 at 5:29 pm to Kcrad
Probably private contractors that are ex military
Posted on 3/20/16 at 5:33 pm to Kcrad
quote:
Jail, or was he just on the other side of the sign?
What I gathered is the guy filming is a UFO conspiracy guy that spends a lot of time riding around as close to the line as possible just waiting for things like this to happen.
Posted on 3/20/16 at 5:34 pm to Rebel
quote:
It wouldn't be CIA on US soil.
lol... Come on, bruh.
Posted on 3/20/16 at 5:41 pm to Rebel
quote:
It wouldn't be CIA on US soil.
Of course it would, depending on who was paying the bill for the program. The CIA spying in the US is where the problem lies. Paying for contract security, no problem.
A direct employee of the CIA does not work perimeter security. That is contracted.
Posted on 3/20/16 at 5:41 pm to RummelTiger
My dad was stationed at Groom Lake for about a year.
He was reverse engineering Soviet Migs. The Soviet AF was defecting at such a high rate in the 80's, we may have had more Migs than the USSR did at one point.
But other than that, I don't know any more about Area 51 than anyone else on this board.
(most likely anyways).
He was reverse engineering Soviet Migs. The Soviet AF was defecting at such a high rate in the 80's, we may have had more Migs than the USSR did at one point.
But other than that, I don't know any more about Area 51 than anyone else on this board.
(most likely anyways).
Posted on 3/20/16 at 5:41 pm to Jim Rockford
Don't they have shoot on sight orders if you go too far into there?
They're lucky they used restraint
They're lucky they used restraint
Posted on 3/20/16 at 5:42 pm to Jim Rockford
They don't play out there. We wandered too close to some part of the base while four wheeling as a kid. Saw them coming out after us and we took off.
Posted on 3/20/16 at 5:45 pm to pioneerbasketball
quote:
Area 51 is serious business.
Ask george noory or art bell.
Don't know who those guys are, but does one of them post as TX Tiger?
Posted on 3/20/16 at 5:48 pm to Kcrad
I guess you could be right. I would think that someone in the CIA has visibility to the functions of Area 51. But oversite of a US Military base isn't really their thing.
Posted on 3/20/16 at 5:50 pm to Napoleon
I guess all the bases I was on were different.
Contracted gate guards had crappy police like uniforms and they would drive even crappier 2wd Tacoma's.
Video looked staged to me. That security wasn't acting like he was going to cuff the guy backing up to him.
Contracted gate guards had crappy police like uniforms and they would drive even crappier 2wd Tacoma's.
Video looked staged to me. That security wasn't acting like he was going to cuff the guy backing up to him.
Posted on 3/20/16 at 5:51 pm to Napoleon
I guess all the bases I was on were different.
Contracted gate guards had crappy police like uniforms and they would drive even crappier 2wd Tacoma's.
Video looked staged to me. That security wasn't acting like he was going to cuff the guy backing up to him.
Contracted gate guards had crappy police like uniforms and they would drive even crappier 2wd Tacoma's.
Video looked staged to me. That security wasn't acting like he was going to cuff the guy backing up to him.
Posted on 3/20/16 at 5:51 pm to SundayFunday
quote:
Don't they have shoot on sight orders if you go too far into there?
They're lucky they used restraint
I haven't seen the signs at 51, but I've seen the signs where I did TDY for 24 months and they clearly stated that deadly force would be used. At that location pre 9/11 it was DOD employees with .38s. After 9/11 it was two camo'ed guys at every entrance. One with an M16a2 and the other with a 12 gauge shotgun, I didn't ask who paid them, but I had an idea. BTW, they didn't frick around.
This wasn't a military base, btw.
I agree, it's plain stupid to trespass there. If a trespasser were to scratch their arse, they might end up dead.
This post was edited on 3/20/16 at 5:55 pm
Posted on 3/20/16 at 5:55 pm to kengel2
quote:
I guess all the bases I was on were different.
Not sure what all bases you've been to. But yes, Lake Groom is most likely well different. It's not a place like Fort Knox that is visible from the interstate.
And yes, they can use deadly force. It is noted on the signs.
Posted on 3/20/16 at 6:21 pm to Jim Rockford
This is all I could think of watching that video.
Posted on 3/20/16 at 6:34 pm to Jim Rockford
I don't see them getting arrested at any point and time in that video.
Now, I'm sure they had a nice long talking to, but I'm highly doubting they were arrested.
Now, I'm sure they had a nice long talking to, but I'm highly doubting they were arrested.
Posted on 3/20/16 at 6:37 pm to Jim Rockford
fake
Posted on 3/20/16 at 7:15 pm to GAAtty70
Clark Griswold = FAF
Posted on 3/20/16 at 7:29 pm to Jim Rockford
The video looks like it might not be real. The real question is what is the government hiding out there?
Page 2 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News