- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
1
Posted on 12/12/18 at 12:52 pm to SPEEDY
Well this would suck. 
Posted on 12/12/18 at 12:52 pm to upgrayedd
I get pissy when something is posted as fact but not close to the truth. Within seconds, all that is accomplished is a shite on California contest of wit. You know? It's inconceivable why gotcha threads are so popular.
Posted on 12/12/18 at 12:52 pm to Sao
I was eagerly awaiting your liberal spin on this.
Posted on 12/12/18 at 12:53 pm to SPEEDY
Green bubbles are THE WORST!
Posted on 12/12/18 at 12:54 pm to SPEEDY
quote:
California, ladies and gentlemen
Learn to swim
Learn to swim
Learn to swim
Learn to swim
Posted on 12/12/18 at 12:54 pm to Janky
Why would I spin either side? I don't have an agenda...
Posted on 12/12/18 at 12:55 pm to Sao
Soooo... you don't know what federal tax policy they're referring to?
Posted on 12/12/18 at 12:55 pm to Sao
quote:
This bill will help blunt the impact of the federal tax plan on everyday Californians by protecting funding for education, affordable health care, and other core priorities
It's a lie... this is attached to everything in order to shame people into agreeing with it. This is completely absurd.
Posted on 12/12/18 at 12:57 pm to upgrayedd
You win. This is my full concession.
Posted on 12/12/18 at 12:58 pm to Sao
I'm not trying to win. Relax.
I'm genuinely curious as to what federal tax burden they're trying to offset. Good Lord
I'm genuinely curious as to what federal tax burden they're trying to offset. Good Lord
Posted on 12/12/18 at 12:59 pm to SPEEDY
quote:
But they add that under the regulators’ proposal the charge could be applied retroactively for five years
They can lick my chocolate starfish if they think i'm going to write those nut jobs a check for text messages I sent years ago
Posted on 12/12/18 at 1:02 pm to Cump11b
quote:
It's a lie... this is attached to everything in order to shame people into agreeing with it. This is completely absurd.
But, you know what's equally absurd? SPEEDY posted stats on the voter turnout for a tax hike vote Saturday for... Baton Rouge. A tax to cover additional monies needed due to prior tax hike absurdity. Point is, how is LA any different than CA?
26% turnout. 74% laziness. Be better than CA before you laugh at CA.
This post was edited on 12/12/18 at 1:04 pm
Posted on 12/12/18 at 1:04 pm to LNCHBOX
But muh liberal shithole.
California is awesome. It’s the stupid policies that make it a place to make fun of. The actual scenery, weather, etc is amazing. Much better than the shitholes that cover most of Louisiana.
California is awesome. It’s the stupid policies that make it a place to make fun of. The actual scenery, weather, etc is amazing. Much better than the shitholes that cover most of Louisiana.
Posted on 12/12/18 at 1:07 pm to Uncle JackD
quote:
really wish that shite hole would’ve just burnt off the map.
I love that your response to thinking California is stupid for some bullshite proposed tax is to burn the entire state off the map
Posted on 12/12/18 at 1:14 pm to SPEEDY
Posted on 12/12/18 at 1:16 pm to Strannix
quote:
Lol are retroactive taxes constitutional?
Has something being Constitutionally questionable ever stopped California before? They've got the 9th circuit to make sure it gets to the SCOTUS before they get dickslapped.
This post was edited on 12/12/18 at 1:19 pm
Posted on 12/12/18 at 1:16 pm to SPEEDY
I'm curious as to why the state thinks that a phone is so important they are willing to tax everyone else so others can have it. It's not a right to have a phone.
Posted on 12/12/18 at 1:18 pm to SPEEDY
Heard this about an hour or so ago. Speedy you are indeed.
Does the article say how much?? Retroactive 5 yrs will make me broke as all I do is text. And no way this would be legal as you would have to force the companies to give the govt your phone logs.
(Yes I judge thread creators by their speedy in getting news on here. As I have found this place a reasonable source of news. Just wish it was more spread out of LA a little more.)
Does the article say how much?? Retroactive 5 yrs will make me broke as all I do is text. And no way this would be legal as you would have to force the companies to give the govt your phone logs.
(Yes I judge thread creators by their speedy in getting news on here. As I have found this place a reasonable source of news. Just wish it was more spread out of LA a little more.)
Posted on 12/12/18 at 1:21 pm to Tiger HouTX
Am I out of touch if I think phones are already widely affordable and available for low income people?
I have never in my life heard of someone in today’s world who cannot afford a cell phone. You might not be able to afford certain data plans or the newest gadgets, but there is no way someone even on min wage can’t afford a phone
I have never in my life heard of someone in today’s world who cannot afford a cell phone. You might not be able to afford certain data plans or the newest gadgets, but there is no way someone even on min wage can’t afford a phone
Page 2 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News