0
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: California has instituted a mandatory age verification law to purchase creatine
Posted on 11/9/26 at 10:51 am to OysterPoBoy
Posted on 11/9/26 at 10:51 am to OysterPoBoy
quote:
Just eat 5 lbs of red meat a day and the problem takes care of itself.
Supplementing it is easier.
Anyway, go with the CreaPure Brand of creatine which is from a European company and not the chinese stuff that has flooded the market.
Posted on 11/9/26 at 10:58 am to tiggerthetooth
Law is passed as millions of homeless lie in filthy streets shooting up opiates with government provided needles and paraphernalia.
Posted on 11/9/26 at 11:01 am to tiggerthetooth
quote:
So you think its worth it to pay someone to supervise teens to monitor their creatine intake?
If my teen was lifting to the point that they’re taking creatine I’d probably consider hiring them a trainer for that.
quote:
Does age verification really make any of this safer in reality?
I’ve already expressed how I feel about that in another post.
Posted on 11/9/26 at 11:18 am to BluegrassBelle
quote:
If my teen was lifting to the point that they’re taking creatine I’d probably consider hiring them a trainer for that.
Should taxpayers pay the government to hire people to monitor teen creatine intake?
quote:
I’ve already expressed how I feel about that in another post.
You just want an extra layer to feel good that people have to pay for. The outcome is irrelevant to you.
Maybe kids who arent so good at these things should be allowed to fail. Smart parents and smart children should not be mandated to supervise dumb children and dumb parents.
There are heavy costs to every safety want, and in many cases the layer of administrative process added ends up heavily corrupted and completely fails to provide any new safety requirements. The net result is another ineffective government program to skim taxpayer dollars to no one's benefit.
Posted on 11/9/26 at 11:19 am to Weekend Warrior79
quote:
but hormone medication to help young kids change genders is reasonable at any age
The only therapy and "treatment" with a 0% success rate but still gets prescribed. Makes perfect sense, right?
Posted on 11/9/26 at 11:21 am to Chucktown_Badger
Also, I want someone to ask Newsome directly..."why do you feel this law is necessary?"
And when he says "because it can harm kids" or "they're not old enough to know the impact of these types of substances" I would just laugh hysterically at the hypocrisy.
And when he says "because it can harm kids" or "they're not old enough to know the impact of these types of substances" I would just laugh hysterically at the hypocrisy.
Posted on 11/9/26 at 11:29 am to tiggerthetooth
But no voter ID
Posted on 11/9/26 at 11:44 am to tiggerthetooth
quote:
You just want an extra layer to feel good that people have to pay for. The outcome is irrelevant to you.
So, you're putting words in my mouth. And obviously didn't refer back to my previous post.
I said it's a lazy measure due to state not wanting to push more on the regulation end (if that's their concern) and getting pushback from the very large group of health and wellness folks in California.
quote:
Should taxpayers pay the government to hire people to monitor teen creatine intake?
Do you think state level folks to enforce regulations don't already exist or something?
Page 3 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News