- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: But She Hit Me First! ETA: NEW PIC IN OP
Posted on 4/4/19 at 11:30 am to tgrbaitn08
Posted on 4/4/19 at 11:30 am to tgrbaitn08
How many punches to knock her/him out?
Posted on 4/4/19 at 11:31 am to NOFOX
quote:
This guy ordered a prostitute to the parking lot of the bar and barbershop he works at after his shift ended?
Yeah, this story makes no sense.
Posted on 4/4/19 at 11:32 am to blueridgeTiger
You can tell that wasn't her first time seeing a gun. She DGAF
Posted on 4/4/19 at 11:36 am to DrSteveBrule
quote:
DGAF
Prolly more of a "business decision".
She's gonna throw down with hipster white boy or MacDaddy Pimp.
She chose well.
Posted on 4/4/19 at 11:39 am to nola000
Man, you’re a fricking idiot
Posted on 4/4/19 at 11:40 am to SUB
quote:
Why the hell did he pull a gun out? Dude's a douche and deserved to get punched for what he did.
My thoughts also.
Dude is facing a lot of charges. Hopefully one of the results will be that he is prohibited from owning firearms. He obviously in not smart enough to be trusted with them and is one of the idiots that makes it hard for the responsible gun owners exercise their rights with out having to deal with idiots that think we're all that stupid.
Posted on 4/4/19 at 11:41 am to Mid Iowa Tiger
quote:
Dude was wrong on so many levels but what a weak arse. 5 clean punches and she doesn't even stagger.
Apparently she’s used to getting pounded
Posted on 4/4/19 at 11:50 am to Deactived
TH03 wasn't in that thread but I see now why LNCHBOX has his panties in a bunch right now.
He got absolutely fricking hammered in that thread. You should have just backed down while you had the chance. Instead you pushed me to go back and review all 20 pages of that thread. You're in almost every single one of those pages.
Your consistent take that, 'everyone should wait until all the evidence comes out before making a judgment' is a respectable position that I actually agree with, as did everybody else in that thread. But that's not why you got hammered.
You got hammered because of your constant implication that the person who posted the video posted it with no audio because they were trying to hide something that justified the officer's actions. That is until they posted a video with the audio and it showed nothing.
Never mind the fact that no matter what audio there was it wasn't going to justify the officer's actions.
Fair.
I wouldn't say never but there are many times. Especially where SJWs are involved.
And there it is. The subtle implication that there was justification where none could possibly exist.
There it is again.
Everyone agrees.
Aaaand there it is again.
And again.
And again.
You're tipping your hand here. Showing obvious emotional influence on your reasoning.
And again.
Quite the comment coming from you.
This is Jones joining in with LNCHBOX
You (LNCHBOX) went on like this for like 17 pages. Once the video came out with audio you changed your tune pretty quickly and crawfished like a motherfuker totally dropping the stance that audio would have had any bearing on the justification of the actions.
He got absolutely fricking hammered in that thread. You should have just backed down while you had the chance. Instead you pushed me to go back and review all 20 pages of that thread. You're in almost every single one of those pages.
Your consistent take that, 'everyone should wait until all the evidence comes out before making a judgment' is a respectable position that I actually agree with, as did everybody else in that thread. But that's not why you got hammered.
You got hammered because of your constant implication that the person who posted the video posted it with no audio because they were trying to hide something that justified the officer's actions. That is until they posted a video with the audio and it showed nothing.
Never mind the fact that no matter what audio there was it wasn't going to justify the officer's actions.
quote:
Can we just wait for the whole story before jumping to conclusions?
Fair.
quote:
These things are never as simple as the first edited video that's released seems.
I wouldn't say never but there are many times. Especially where SJWs are involved.
quote:
They didn't even include the sound Seems fairly obvious there is some form of bias here.
And there it is. The subtle implication that there was justification where none could possibly exist.
quote:
Maybe they tried to just let him go with a warning and he was an arse about it. The bottom line is we have a very one sided partial video, and we all know those are almost always bullshite.
There it is again.
quote:
If the entire incident is what's in the video, of course that is indefensible.
Everyone agrees.
quote:
But that's extremely unlikely.
Aaaand there it is again.
quote:
Except for not including the entire incident and being pretty obviously biased, sure they're nothing alike.
And again.
quote:
No sound and obviously partial.
And again.
quote:
Obviously all cops are racist and just out beating up innocent black kids trying to enjoy a parade. Case closed.
You're tipping your hand here. Showing obvious emotional influence on your reasoning.
quote:
It's just more evidence that this video is clearly biased and leaving things out.
And again.
quote:
But that's another great assumption you've made.
Quite the comment coming from you.
This is Jones joining in with LNCHBOX
quote:
Bevause if you go out of your way to show the video without the sound, something was said that makes the guy look bad
Just show the video as is
You (LNCHBOX) went on like this for like 17 pages. Once the video came out with audio you changed your tune pretty quickly and crawfished like a motherfuker totally dropping the stance that audio would have had any bearing on the justification of the actions.
Posted on 4/4/19 at 11:52 am to nola000
dude give it a fricking rest
Posted on 4/4/19 at 11:52 am to LNCHBOX
It would have been absolutely hilarious if you just would have never responded to that post that took him 30 minutes to put together
Posted on 4/4/19 at 11:55 am to LNCHBOX
quote:
nola000 was right all along, this IS just like that Mardi Gras incident
And how does that change the fact that the bartender was wrong?
You don't need to know what happened before or what happened after to know that the actions by the bartender that were captured in the video were incorrect.
Posted on 4/4/19 at 11:55 am to Mr. Hangover
I can't believe it took him this long to realize I was in that thread.
Posted on 4/4/19 at 11:56 am to Deactived
quote:
Just wait until 6 o'clock and you gonna get excel stomped
So you two are saying that this justifies the action by the bartender?
I'm not understanding where y'all are coming from.
Posted on 4/4/19 at 11:56 am to nola000
What's sad is you think that giant post made you look good here.
You were dumb in that thread, and youre still dumb now. All you did is show it off to more people.
You were dumb in that thread, and youre still dumb now. All you did is show it off to more people.
This post was edited on 4/4/19 at 4:10 pm
Posted on 4/4/19 at 11:56 am to nola000
My god dude, just STFU already
Are you this socially awkward IRL?
Are you this socially awkward IRL?
This post was edited on 4/4/19 at 11:58 am
Posted on 4/4/19 at 11:57 am to nola000
quote:
So you two are saying that this justifies the action by the bartender?
Don't forget to wipe the drool from your chin
Posted on 4/4/19 at 12:01 pm to LNCHBOX
quote:
Holy fricking melt
Funny when you get exposed it's, "holy fricking melt" and the like.
You're such a shity arse poster.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News