re: Boards opinion on new nuclear power plants?

Yup. I'm a hard "NO" on nukes for all the reasons mentioned upthread.

quote:

---

A healthy debate is good, but when someone is as misinformed as you are, and you are willing to blatantly lie about a radiation death, it becomes pointless.

---

Lol, yes. IF this were an actual "debate" and discussion instead of exercise in ad hominems and bullhorn shout downs or "LIAR!"

CHALLENGE: Point out ANY lie. OR FACT of "misinformation". Thanks.

quote:

---

Even if your lie were true, I'd say that one, or ten, or even a hundred radiation fatalities in over 40 years of operating over 100 power plants is a pretty good track record, and would hold up admirably against the track record of fossil plants,

---

Facts are facts and my firsthand personal testimony and truth is still truth. There was indeed a brazen cover-up. But believe what you need to believe (or disbelieve). No skin off my nose.

Regarding your presumption of minimal radiation fatalities -- direct and indirect -- you've still managed to dismiss or ignore both the Chernobyl and Fukushima disasters. The fatalities -- direct and indirect won't ever be calculated or tallied for obvious reasons.

Deuce -- Why do you think any PTB cover-ups of other Power Plant incidents weren't/aren't possible due to financial and political ramifications and liability?

Here's the BIGGER problem -- we've currently people in charge who have never been as incompetent, negligent, and corrupt than ever (see the current Admin, Covidian Op, Eugenics agenda, etal).