Started By
Message

re: Best SUV/Small SUV?

Posted on 9/13/16 at 12:59 am to
Posted by thetigerman
Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas
Member since Sep 2006
3630 posts
Posted on 9/13/16 at 12:59 am to
quote:

Just bought a CrossTrek myself and love it.


What's been your opinion of the power when you step on it? I have a client who is a tech for Subaru and he's not a fan. I love how they look though.
Posted by ShermanTxTiger
Broussard, La
Member since Oct 2007
11373 posts
Posted on 9/13/16 at 1:29 am to
My wife got the 2016 Ford Explorer last year. It is doable under 40K... We got a Red Sport for about 42... It is turbo charged and pretty bad arse. Gas mileage is not great.... but you have to pay for 360 hp.

The Acadia and Grand Cherokee were #2 and 3.
Posted by Britlab
Nashville
Member since Jan 2014
371 posts
Posted on 9/13/16 at 6:23 am to
My concern is the CVT transmissions in the Suburus. I've read bad things about them, both from a reliability and performance stand point. Thoughts?
Posted by 632627
LA
Member since Dec 2011
15019 posts
Posted on 9/13/16 at 7:28 am to
A used Volvo XC60 fits your requirements.

Posted by member12
Bob's Country Bunker
Member since May 2008
33142 posts
Posted on 9/13/16 at 10:03 am to
quote:

My concern is the CVT transmissions in the Suburus.


Our Honda and Subuaru both have CVTs. Both work like an automatic.

The Honda's has some quirks, including surging at low speeds. It also takes a few moments for it to shift into reverse when cold. I've had Honda dealers look at it and they say it's normal. It gets incredible fuel economy so I don't complain too much. We see about 36mpg on the highway, and it's fairly quick.

The Subaru's works exactly as advertised. No issues with it. It has flappy paddles on the steering wheel if manual downshifting is needed. It's definitely a better unit than what's in the Honda. It also helps return great fuel economy and operates very smoothly. Our Outback returns about 31-32mpg on the highway, which is pretty good for a big four wheel drive station wagon.

Nissan, Honda, and Subaru all use CVTs in a lot of vehicles. Based on my experience, the fundamentals of a CVT are not a problem. It makes sense to keep the engine in its most efficient power band as long as possible. The tuning and programming of the CVT can vary greatly, as they do in two of our cars. For us, the Subaru beats the Honda in tuning, performance, and programming, which greatly contributes to my opinion of the Subaru and the driving experience.
This post was edited on 9/13/16 at 10:12 am
Posted by thetigerman
Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas
Member since Sep 2006
3630 posts
Posted on 9/13/16 at 10:57 am to
Yeah I've not actually driven a Subaru, but reviews I read say the CVT is clunky and awkward. But most people don't have a problem with it.
Posted by 13SaintTiger
Isle of Capri
Member since Sep 2011
18405 posts
Posted on 9/13/16 at 11:04 am to
quote:

Mazda CX-5


Agree. Got my wife the 2016 one last spring, skyactive tech and all the do-dads. She loves it and I like it as well
Posted by tokenBoiler
Lafayette, Indiana
Member since Aug 2012
5044 posts
Posted on 9/13/16 at 11:20 am to
quote:

Yeah I've not actually driven a Subaru, but reviews I read say the CVT is clunky and awkward. But most people don't have a problem with it.


Are you sure the reviews specified Subaru's CVT? As mentioned, some CVTs have that rep, but I don't think Subaru's does.

When I bought my Outback a couple of years ago, one of the reasons I picked it over a Forester was because I specifically wanted the CVT and the Forester didn't offer it. I've been happy with it, and it's never been anything but smooth and reliable for me.
Posted by Dr RC
The Money Pit
Member since Aug 2011
61468 posts
Posted on 9/13/16 at 11:25 am to
The fiance has a '14 CRV w/a CVT and I don't have a problem with it. I guess if I was trying to fly around corners and drive like it's a toy it would be an issue but as a daily driver in DFW it's just fine. The gas mileage is great and it can store a good deal of stuff for it's size. You get pretty good visibility all the way around too which is nice since a lot of SUVs and CUVs these days really bone you w/the rear pillars. The only negatives are that it's a little boring w/it's egg like looks and the interior is kind of plain.


As for the OP, if you want something w/a little more power and size I really love my '14 Jeep Grand Cherokee. I wasn't even considering it and looked at damn near everything else first but after driving it I was sold. You can likely get a '14 or '15 w/the Overland trim in the mid 30ks which should give you 4*4 and a very nice leather interior. HOWEVER, the one thing I would say is an absolute must if you get the JCG is you need to have one w/the lane detection system. There is a wicked blind spot on the driver side that would make driving in DFW a huge pain in the arse if I didn't have that.
This post was edited on 9/13/16 at 11:45 am
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 5Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram