Started By
Message

re: Beach rules in Walton County, Florida

Posted on 6/18/18 at 9:33 pm to
Posted by SippyCup
Gulf Coast
Member since Sep 2008
6141 posts
Posted on 6/18/18 at 9:33 pm to
I’ve always heard it referred to as the historical high tide line.

The legal description of our property in Miramar extends to about 10’ from the current high tide line.
Posted by ags01
Member since Mar 2006
3885 posts
Posted on 6/18/18 at 10:33 pm to
I came here looking for some sort of clarification. All I have received is at least 6 different understandings of the law. As usual, I'm pretty sure if I say frick off, and have the stroke to back it up, I can get what I want. I do not; however, have the stroke, so I suppose I'll take my shite with me every night. I will, however blast Ray Wiley and say, Screw You; We're from Texas.

LINK
This post was edited on 6/18/18 at 10:35 pm
Posted by JuiceTerry
Roond the Scheme
Member since Apr 2013
40868 posts
Posted on 6/18/18 at 11:06 pm to
First of all, don't leave your shite on the beach unless you don't care about it disappearing

Secondly, the customary use issue is out the window now. Homes on the beach have the right to all the beach in front of them now. If someone sets up there, they have the law on their side if they tell those people to get lost.
Posted by shutterspeed
MS Gulf Coast
Member since May 2007
63407 posts
Posted on 6/18/18 at 11:13 pm to
Is strange to me to think that someone can "own" a natural resource like a beach.
Posted by ags01
Member since Mar 2006
3885 posts
Posted on 6/18/18 at 11:15 pm to
quote:

those people


But do those people include the Sheriff or whatever the frick you call them down there?
This post was edited on 6/18/18 at 11:15 pm
Posted by JuiceTerry
Roond the Scheme
Member since Apr 2013
40868 posts
Posted on 6/18/18 at 11:22 pm to
quote:

Is strange to me to think that someone can "own" a natural resource like a beach.
It's a mess, and the issue isn't going away anytime soon. In actuality, every parcel is different, but for now they're allowing the property owners to keep people off "their" beach.

Posted by cave canem
pullarius dominus
Member since Oct 2012
12186 posts
Posted on 6/18/18 at 11:57 pm to
quote:

Is strange to me to think that someone can "own" a natural resource like a beach.


A beach is a natural rescouse?

What makes it any different from any other piece of people own waterfront property all over the place.
Posted by EA6B
TX
Member since Dec 2012
14754 posts
Posted on 6/19/18 at 1:15 am to
quote:

."
quote:

Homes on the beach have the right to all the beach in front of them now.



This is not uniformly true, from the Sheriff of Walton County,

"Not all coastal property lines run all the way to the water and the public beach extends much further inland in areas where beach renourishment has been done, Adkinson said."

“Every piece of property has to be treated differently,” he said
This post was edited on 6/19/18 at 1:16 am
Posted by thesoccerfanjax
Member since Nov 2013
6128 posts
Posted on 6/19/18 at 3:24 am to
Right. It’s actually not that complicated. The beach itself may or not be included as part of the lot the owner purchased...just like any other lot in the world. In cases where it is included, you have the easement factor.
Posted by TimeOutdoors
AK
Member since Sep 2014
12123 posts
Posted on 6/19/18 at 4:16 am to
Only private to the erosion control line. If the beach has been widened then it’s only private to the old erosion control line (surveyed and recorded prior to the widening of the beach).
Posted by BuyloSellhi
The South
Member since May 2017
616 posts
Posted on 6/19/18 at 6:08 am to
quote:

This is not uniformly true, from the Sheriff of Walton County, "Not all coastal property lines run all the way to the water and the public beach extends much further inland in areas where beach renourishment has been done, Adkinson said." “Every piece of property has to be treated


The beach renourishment program was rejected by over 90% of the property owners. That led to the Customary Use decree, which was nullified by the Florida Governor. As stated, July 1 is the start of the enforcement date.

This is really a big deal over not much. There is plenty of beach available for everyone. And you can walk from Destin to Panama City on the beachfront if you want. No problem. You just can’t set up shop on someone’s backyard.
Posted by baldona
Florida
Member since Feb 2016
20483 posts
Posted on 6/19/18 at 7:30 am to
OP, yes you are correct.

You can't leave crap on the beach overnight because the county picks up trash on the beach. Anything left overnight is considered trash, that's where a lot of this "easement" stuff comes from. Otherwise you'd have homeowners with their portion of the beach full of trash.

You are correct in that most owners own to the mean high tide mark, as others said the wet sand. You have to look at the property appraisal to official see this.

Beach owners can do essentially what they want on their own beach during the day, but it must be removed at night so it can be cleaned.

There's a HUGE difference between a county "easement" and public use.
Posted by shutterspeed
MS Gulf Coast
Member since May 2007
63407 posts
Posted on 6/19/18 at 8:23 am to
quote:

What makes it any different from any other piece of people own waterfront property all over the place.


Nothing. I find that equally strange.
Posted by baldona
Florida
Member since Feb 2016
20483 posts
Posted on 6/19/18 at 8:52 am to
quote:

What makes it any different from any other piece of people own waterfront property all over the place.


Nothing. I find that equally strange.


People own waterfront all over the place. There are tons of rules for waterfront/ beachfront that vary by city, county, state, etc. I don't really understand why anyone has a hard time with this?

Some counties don't allow any public use at all, some let the public use the whole beach/ shoreline, and some allow a mixed use in between there.

A beach is no different than any other type of land. Why people think it is confuses me. Furthermore, just like any other land there is public/ county/ city owned property right next to private land. The rules for both can vary greatly.

ETA: What makes a beach/ shoreline different is that no one "owns" the water usually but not always. The water in the ocean fluctuates. So where that fluctuation occurs is generally "public" or not owned by anyone. That is where it can get tricky. Its really a pretty simple matter.
This post was edited on 6/19/18 at 8:55 am
Posted by Gaston
Dirty Coast
Member since Aug 2008
39025 posts
Posted on 6/19/18 at 9:43 am to
quote:

Seagrove Beach


Houses are pretty stacked up down there, it's not like you have a private stretch of beach. Your access point will likely be multiple walkways funneled into one.

Definitely go to Buddy's (seafood market in Seagrove) and pick up some freshly steamed shrimp.
Posted by JuiceTerry
Roond the Scheme
Member since Apr 2013
40868 posts
Posted on 6/19/18 at 11:12 am to
quote:


This is not uniformly true,
Not in a strictly legal sense, as I said above, every parcel is different.

In a practical sense, that's the way it is right now. People can obviously walk the beach anywhere, but if they set up in front of somebody's house, and there's a conflict, and the authorities have to be called in to settle it, those people will be moved off of the property.

There are a lot of areas on 30a where people aren't complete dicks about it, but there are many where they are.
This post was edited on 6/19/18 at 11:15 am
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram