- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Arkansas Voted An Increase To The Min Wage - $11.00 Over 3 Years
Posted on 11/7/18 at 10:14 am to AUCE05
Posted on 11/7/18 at 10:14 am to AUCE05
quote:
This talking point is always a great way to identify people with little economic knowledge. Somewhere in 1899, there was a guy who was passionally against mechanical horses bescause it would negitavly effect the horse industry, and take away jobs.
It’s funny because your lack of understanding of basic economic principles, most importantly, economies of scale.
Machines can make and do things far faster, far more efficiently, and far longer than humans can and with far less overhead and problems.
It’s not even comparable.
Posted on 11/7/18 at 10:14 am to slackster
quote:
It's the same logic.
Why stop at $11?
THis is such a lame argument
"Why not make the minimum wage $100"
Well duh frick stick because $100 an hour would make no more sense than the current $8.25 does.
My dad owns a small business in Arkansas , exactly zero of his 24 emmployees make less than $11 an hour anyway. As the link another person posted shows, VERY few adult workers are making minimum wage, which meanasraising minimum wage isn't going to cause very many employees to fire workers, cut hours, most employers won't even notice the increase because it won't even affect them.
But for the relatively few cheap asses out there who are not paying a reasonable wage, yes they will have to increase wages.
I don't have much sympathy for those people.
Posted on 11/7/18 at 10:15 am to AUCE05
quote:
This talking point is always a great way to identify people with little economic knowledge. Somewhere in 1899, there was a guy who was passionally against mechanical horses because it would negitavly effect the horse industry, and take away jobs.
There wasn't a minimum wage in 1899. Labor was cheap. It allowed people to change industry rather fluidly.
In today's technical age and overbearing HR departments this is no longer possible.
Posted on 11/7/18 at 10:16 am to FLAK88
quote:
The increase will make low-income workers worse off, not better, because it forces employers to cut back on hiring and hours to afford paying higher wages.
So does an increase in oil per bbl. How does a state like Louisiana balance that? See what I mean?
Posted on 11/7/18 at 10:17 am to HeyHeyHogsAllTheWay
quote:
not paying a reasonable wage,
A reasonable wage is for the employer and employee to determine. Not you, not me, not the govt.
If the employee agrees to $1 an hour, that’s his prerogative. You, I, nor the govt should dictate the terms of contractual employment between two consenting adults
Posted on 11/7/18 at 10:18 am to Sao
quote:
So does an increase in oil per bbl. How does a state like Louisiana balance that? See what I mean?
I don't get your point here?
Posted on 11/7/18 at 10:18 am to beerJeep
Exactly. Forcing the workforce to become more employable. A higher educated workforce is a great thing.
Posted on 11/7/18 at 10:18 am to HeyHeyHogsAllTheWay
quote:
voted yes on this though because I've little doubt that there are areas of the state where the minimum wage is all that is offered.
Same reason I would vote for it.
Many on here love to rail against the economics of it. The issue nobody considers is that in urbanized areas, you have multiple companies offering competitive wages.
Many places across the country are very rural. There is no competition or incentive to raise wage beyond minimum. So you are stuck making low wages.
Night school programs are another solution to this, though it brings us back to the original problem, availability.
This post was edited on 11/7/18 at 10:21 am
Posted on 11/7/18 at 10:19 am to HeyHeyHogsAllTheWay
quote:
But for the relatively few cheap asses out there who are not paying a reasonable wage,
Is it your opinion that many small businesses could absorb higher wages based on arbitrary reasoning?
Competition is now global for most industries
Posted on 11/7/18 at 10:19 am to AUCE05
quote:
Forcing the workforce to become more employable. A higher educated workforce is a great thing
How are you going to force people to become employable or more educated?
Posted on 11/7/18 at 10:20 am to beerJeep
quote:
It’s funny because your lack of understanding of basic economic principles, most importantly, economies of scale.
Correct. He's arguing against himself
Posted on 11/7/18 at 10:21 am to RogerTheShrubber
Again
quote:
The increase will make low-income workers worse off, not better, because it forces employers to cut back on hiring and hours to afford paying higher wages.
For a state like LA who is reliant on Energy to sustain itself for the most part and who loves an increase in bbl, for employers outside of the energy sector, are they constantly laying off staff to compensate?
Posted on 11/7/18 at 10:21 am to volod
quote:
So you are stuck making low wages
Only if you choose to.
Posted on 11/7/18 at 10:23 am to HeyHeyHogsAllTheWay
Fix this problem:
A run-of-the-mill catfish restaurant in, say, El Dorado. Rough estimate 6 employees over 10 hours a day. Jumping from $9 to $11 is an additional $120 a day x 365 = $43,800, lets knock it down to $40k for holidays.
What do you do as the owner?
A run-of-the-mill catfish restaurant in, say, El Dorado. Rough estimate 6 employees over 10 hours a day. Jumping from $9 to $11 is an additional $120 a day x 365 = $43,800, lets knock it down to $40k for holidays.
What do you do as the owner?
Posted on 11/7/18 at 10:24 am to beerJeep
quote:
reasonable wage is for the employer and employee to determine. Not you, not me, not the govt.
If the employee agrees to $1 an hour, that’s his prerogative. You, I, nor the govt should dictate the terms of contractual employment between two consenting adults
Do you even history bro? I mean seriously. We tried that, and it resulted in the employer deciding what was fair for them and the employee either accepting it or not having a job at all.
What's next are you going to argue that deciding on whether a company disposes of their chemical waste by dumping it into drinking water should be up to each company rather than the government?
We live in a society that has voted and decided that there needs to be certain checks on businesses because a business will always have THEIR best interest at heart above all else.
Sure it would be cheaper for McDonalds to hire illegals and pay them the $4 an hour cash under the table that they would be willing to work for then to pay the government mandated W2 wage. It would also be cheaper for them to gather their garbage up every night and just toss it in the street rather than paying a garbage bill every month. That doesn't mean it would be best for everyone else though.
Those two arguments are exactly the same.
Posted on 11/7/18 at 10:24 am to Sao
quote:
are they constantly laying off staff to compensate?
Some, yes. Raising prices isn't always an option
When gas prices rise, people use less fuel. When wages rise, people use less labor. This is all freshman level Econ.
Posted on 11/7/18 at 10:24 am to beerJeep
IQ is normally distributed throughout society. If people have a reason to progress their learning, they will. To use your go to example, if fastfood moves to an automated process, then jobs in robotics will be available. If an organization is able to pay slave wages, they will never progress their processes, and exploit that advantage.
Posted on 11/7/18 at 10:26 am to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
Is it your opinion that many small businesses could absorb higher wages based on arbitrary reasoning?
Competition is now global for most industries
LULZ how many small business that pay the prevailing minimum wage do you really believe are competing on a global market? Come on.
Posted on 11/7/18 at 10:27 am to HeyHeyHogsAllTheWay
quote:
We live in a society that has voted and decided that there needs to be certain checks on businesses because a business will always have THEIR best interest at heart above all else.
Are you a socialist?
Yes, businesses always have their self interest at heart. They also need to attract employees through a competitive wage. When that wage rises above the viability of automation, they fire employees.
Posted on 11/7/18 at 10:27 am to HeyHeyHogsAllTheWay
These people who think free market will solve all problems get amnesia when you bring up our industrial past. "Company money", the need to create the EPA. OSHA. They view the gov as a big bad monster.
Popular
Back to top



2




