- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Are there still people who believe that the virus came from the wet market?
Posted on 5/2/20 at 4:24 pm to Darth_Vader
Posted on 5/2/20 at 4:24 pm to Darth_Vader
quote:
BTW, if your gonna downvote my post, at least have the balls to explain what I’ve said that you disapprove of.
As you wish, you have been downvoted for your high confidence in your incorrect knowledge and for your obvious lack of diversity in where you receive your information.
quote:
1. China and the WHO both lied to the world as late as February claiming there was no evidence of human to human transmission of the virus.
False - From the CDC Website CDC Research Report
quote:
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is the etiologic agent of the current rapidly growing outbreak of 2019 novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19), originating from the city of Wuhan, Hubei Province, China (1). Initially, 41 cases of “pneumonia of unknown etiology” were reported to the World Health Organization by the Wuhan Municipal Health Committee at the end of December 2019 (2). On January 8, 2020, the pathogen was identified (1), and human-to-human transmission was reported soon after. By January 21, most provinces of China had reported COVID-19 cases.
In regards to the partial travel ban, the U.S and other countries did it all nearly the same way with partial restrictions. Numerous studies have been done about the effect of travel restrictions on a pandemic spread and the results are all fairly similar.
quote:CATO Institute
These dozen studies are unanimous that anything less than an immediate total travel restriction has only a “modest,” “little,” “low,” “negligible,” or no effect at all on the spread of a pandemic.
quote:Brookings Center
a 95% restriction is required for any substantial reduction in incidence.
I am not defending China, they unquestionably have fault in this, but intentional or not is still unknown regardless of anyone's suspicions or feelings.
Posted on 5/2/20 at 5:20 pm to Spankum
quote:
both sides will just use it to push their political agendas
So what's the Dem's agenda here? Sucking China's dick? And why would anyone approve of that?
Posted on 5/2/20 at 5:25 pm to IamPatman
quote:
but intentional or not is still unknown regardless of anyone's suspicions or feelings.
They stopped travel within their own country while allowing that same province to travel internationally. That is the definition of intentional.
Posted on 5/2/20 at 5:33 pm to IamPatman
quote:
IamPatman
Why did you fail to address the fact China shutdown domestic travel to and from Wuhan while allowing international travel?
Or does that not fit your piece of shite progressive narrative?
Posted on 5/3/20 at 12:38 am to Darth_Vader
quote:
Why did you fail to address the fact China shutdown domestic travel to and from Wuhan while allowing international travel?
Or does that not fit your piece of shite progressive narrative?
I did dipshit, I told you travel restrictions dont matter unless they're 100% and cited multiple studies. Regardless, you are misrepresenting what occurred for your own sycophantic narrative. NOBODY stopped all international travel until after it was everywhere! My only narrative is the facts based on evidence, you need to loosen up the tinfoil hat on that wasted space between your ears.
How about you picking out one topic of my response that could have been slightly ambiguous, but failing to address the FACT your first statement of the reported human transmission timeline was completely false. Oh wait...I know why, because you are a lying piece of shite trying to misdirect from the fact you have no idea what the frick you are talking about. But I knew that from that the get go Derp Vader!
This post was edited on 5/3/20 at 1:55 am
Posted on 5/3/20 at 5:51 am to Spankum
quote:
I heard a news story today that some US scientists are saying it didn’t come from a laboratory.
The article I read said it wasn't a LAB CREATED virus. It doesn't mean they were not doing research on it and it got out. Which I believe is truly the case here. Then they tried to hide it from the world as long as they could.
Posted on 5/3/20 at 6:14 am to Macintosh
quote:
Its a biological weapon
Best post of the day.
Only problem is that it hasn't killed enough if that's the purpose.
China needs to do more R&D.
Posted on 5/3/20 at 6:17 am to SloaneRanger
I really don’t know what to believe as it’s origin.
Posted on 5/3/20 at 6:38 am to Hurricane Mike
quote:
So what's the Dem's agenda here?
1. Keep the economy in shambles until Nov
2. Collapse healthcare and install socialized medicine
3. Collapse the whole economy and move to install "democratic" socialism.
Posted on 5/3/20 at 6:47 am to el Gaucho
I think it’s safe to say the Communist China Party has some on their social disinformation goons in this thread.
100% Bio-Weapon from the lab where they were tweaking the bat virus.
100% Bio-Weapon from the lab where they were tweaking the bat virus.
Posted on 5/3/20 at 6:49 am to Tempratt
quote:Dead economic slaves are no good to China. They need us mostly alive but under their leadership. That’s the folly the Dems are leading us deeper into.
Only problem is that it hasn't killed enough if that's the purpose.
This post was edited on 5/3/20 at 6:50 am
Posted on 5/3/20 at 7:09 am to Volvagia
quote:
0% chance it was an engineered virus
You are FOS. Please explain all the money that Gates and Soros are dumping into that lab and connect the dots on why Gates is also now the biggest contributor to the WHO and has graciously offered us his vaccine. Surely you can’t be that clueless to think there’s a 0% chance there is plenty of frickery involved in this.
Popular
Back to top

2








