- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Anyone Else Find this Renewed Push for a Moon Landing Interesting?
Posted on 8/17/19 at 11:33 pm to OleWarSkuleAlum
Posted on 8/17/19 at 11:33 pm to OleWarSkuleAlum
I'm cautiously optimistic. We've been down this road before claiming we're going back, giving the program a fancy name and logo, then doing nothing. So I'll treat it like I do when I hear the LSU offense supposedly becoming wide open modern spread.
Posted on 8/17/19 at 11:36 pm to OleWarSkuleAlum
Much more interesting is the effort that this board will put into trying to convince you that suddenly Huntsville is the hippest, coolest, new found utopia in the western hemisphere.
Lord help us!
Lord help us!
Posted on 8/17/19 at 11:44 pm to Scruffy
quote:Honestly. Just looking around, I don't think people will see it as a big deal. They'll be like "oh that's pretty cool. Ok, Time for dinner"
Our country needs something like this too.
We need a morale boost.
This post was edited on 8/17/19 at 11:45 pm
Posted on 8/18/19 at 4:35 am to Tiguar
Its going to be pretty damn cool to watch something I built go to the moon.
Subtle brag, I work on SLS.
Subtle brag, I work on SLS.
Posted on 8/18/19 at 6:25 am to Shiftyplus1
quote:
We should have had the beginnings of a lunar colony by the 90s. Going to Mars is much easier if the trip starts at the Moon.
I just listened to short Audible production called “The Man Who Knew the Way to the Moon.” It was about the guy who took up the banner for the modular approach to the moon mission vs alternatives that were also being considered. I found it to be interesting. It’s not a terribly technical book but it does raise the question of if we would have been further along in our manned space program had we chosen another method. The lunar orbit rendezvous strategy allowed us to meet the goal of putting a man on the moon by the end of the 60s but at the same time it didn’t create a foundation for further exploration.
Of course it’s all hypothetical at this point, but imagine where we might be had we chosen to build a staging station in Earth orbit and use it to go to the moon. That same station (or version 2.0 or 3.0) might also serve as a launchpad to Mars or beyond.
Posted on 8/18/19 at 7:53 am to OleWarSkuleAlum
I would be totally psyched for it because I love the space program and it’s history. However, there have been too many times they’ve said they are going to this or that only to have Congress cut the funding and cancel the program.
This post was edited on 8/18/19 at 7:54 am
Posted on 8/18/19 at 7:57 am to castorinho
quote:
Honestly. Just looking around, I don't think people will see it as a big deal. They'll be like "oh that's pretty cool. Ok, Time for dinner"
Over 50% of this country is too worried about LGBTQ+%^*HAO then landing on the moon. I’m not impressed by SLS or anything else. They told us we would have a moon elevator that would be breaking new ground not sending another ship with conventional propulsion.
Popular
Back to top


0





