Started By
Message

re: Anyone Else Find this Renewed Push for a Moon Landing Interesting?

Posted on 8/17/19 at 11:33 pm to
Posted by Teddy Ruxpin
Member since Oct 2006
40991 posts
Posted on 8/17/19 at 11:33 pm to
I'm cautiously optimistic. We've been down this road before claiming we're going back, giving the program a fancy name and logo, then doing nothing. So I'll treat it like I do when I hear the LSU offense supposedly becoming wide open modern spread.
Posted by Amadeo
Member since Jan 2004
4900 posts
Posted on 8/17/19 at 11:36 pm to
Much more interesting is the effort that this board will put into trying to convince you that suddenly Huntsville is the hippest, coolest, new found utopia in the western hemisphere.



Lord help us!
Posted by castorinho
13623 posts
Member since Nov 2010
88338 posts
Posted on 8/17/19 at 11:44 pm to
quote:

Our country needs something like this too.

We need a morale boost.

Honestly. Just looking around, I don't think people will see it as a big deal. They'll be like "oh that's pretty cool. Ok, Time for dinner"
This post was edited on 8/17/19 at 11:45 pm
Posted by WestlakeTiger
San Antonio, Tejas
Member since Feb 2012
9510 posts
Posted on 8/18/19 at 4:35 am to
Its going to be pretty damn cool to watch something I built go to the moon.


Subtle brag, I work on SLS.
Posted by BR Tiger
Baton Rouge
Member since Mar 2004
4759 posts
Posted on 8/18/19 at 6:25 am to
quote:

We should have had the beginnings of a lunar colony by the 90s. Going to Mars is much easier if the trip starts at the Moon.


I just listened to short Audible production called “The Man Who Knew the Way to the Moon.” It was about the guy who took up the banner for the modular approach to the moon mission vs alternatives that were also being considered. I found it to be interesting. It’s not a terribly technical book but it does raise the question of if we would have been further along in our manned space program had we chosen another method. The lunar orbit rendezvous strategy allowed us to meet the goal of putting a man on the moon by the end of the 60s but at the same time it didn’t create a foundation for further exploration.

Of course it’s all hypothetical at this point, but imagine where we might be had we chosen to build a staging station in Earth orbit and use it to go to the moon. That same station (or version 2.0 or 3.0) might also serve as a launchpad to Mars or beyond.
Posted by TheFonz
Somewhere in Louisiana
Member since Jul 2016
23545 posts
Posted on 8/18/19 at 7:53 am to
I would be totally psyched for it because I love the space program and it’s history. However, there have been too many times they’ve said they are going to this or that only to have Congress cut the funding and cancel the program.
This post was edited on 8/18/19 at 7:54 am
Posted by OleWarSkuleAlum
Huntsville, AL
Member since Dec 2013
10293 posts
Posted on 8/18/19 at 7:57 am to
quote:

Honestly. Just looking around, I don't think people will see it as a big deal. They'll be like "oh that's pretty cool. Ok, Time for dinner"


Over 50% of this country is too worried about LGBTQ+%^*HAO then landing on the moon. I’m not impressed by SLS or anything else. They told us we would have a moon elevator that would be breaking new ground not sending another ship with conventional propulsion.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram