Started By
Message

re: Another math thread: "In dog beers I've only had one" doesn't make sense

Posted on 5/20/19 at 6:54 pm to
Posted by slackster
Houston
Member since Mar 2009
85007 posts
Posted on 5/20/19 at 6:54 pm to
quote:

No, I promise you it’s still 10 in human years.


That makes no sense in this context.
Posted by ReauxlTide222
St. Petersburg
Member since Nov 2010
83480 posts
Posted on 5/20/19 at 6:54 pm to
quote:

70 in human years sport.
I’d bet that no dog has ever lived 70 human years. We count our years as 365 days.

Dogs don’t live that long.
Posted by ReauxlTide222
St. Petersburg
Member since Nov 2010
83480 posts
Posted on 5/20/19 at 6:55 pm to
quote:

Post the rest of that Wiktionary clip...
I had my fingers crossed that neither of you asked me to do this
Posted by ReauxlTide222
St. Petersburg
Member since Nov 2010
83480 posts
Posted on 5/20/19 at 6:56 pm to
Posted by YipSkiddlyDooo
Member since Apr 2013
3640 posts
Posted on 5/20/19 at 7:01 pm to
I mean it became obvious they are trolling at this point but the wiki link describes the term “dog years” exactly how it’s always been used/applied. The correct way...
Posted by RobbBobb
Matt Flynn, BCS MVP
Member since Feb 2007
27935 posts
Posted on 5/20/19 at 7:05 pm to
quote:

wiki link

I just edited to be the correct way. Now what?
Posted by Korkstand
Member since Nov 2003
28709 posts
Posted on 5/20/19 at 7:32 pm to
Let me break it down for you dog years all the time, I can define phrases however I want types.

The purpose of "animal years" is to compare the relative lifespans of two animals. Agreed? You kind of have to.

Ok, so you're comparing a dog's life to a human's. You say your 7 year old dog is 49 dog years old, and you say your 49 year old arse is 7 dog years old. Dog years both ways, you do what you want.

Ok, now compare a dog's life to a cat's life. Still going with dog years both ways? Ok, they live about the same, so the 7 year old dog is 7 dog years old, and the 7 year old cat is 7 dog years old. You do what you want.

Now take the dog out, and let's compare a cat's life with a squirrel. Which animal do you choose to go both ways with? You have no logical way to answer this question, because you have insisted on defining "dog years" incorrectly.



The only way this whole exercise makes sense is to define "dog years" correctly and logically. Animal X is animal Y years old, and animal Y is animal X years old. A 7 year old dog is 49 human years old, and a 49 year old human is 7 dog years old.
Posted by slackster
Houston
Member since Mar 2009
85007 posts
Posted on 5/20/19 at 7:33 pm to
quote:

I mean it became obvious they are trolling at this point but the wiki link describes the term “dog years” exactly how it’s always been used/applied. The correct way...



Both links described it it both ways.

Only one way makes logical sense. I'll continue to roll with the one that actually makes sense when you put a modicum of intelligent thought into it.
Posted by ReauxlTide222
St. Petersburg
Member since Nov 2010
83480 posts
Posted on 5/20/19 at 7:41 pm to
quote:

You say your 7 year old dog is 49 dog years old
Yes.

You say this because a dog’s year as far as maturity goes(which is why this is a term and concept) lasts about 52 days long. If the dog was alive for 7 human years, it would be about 49 dog years old.

That is what the saying means and what it’s used for.
quote:

and you say your 49 year old arse is 7 dog years old
Nobody does this. Nobody is conceptualizing or comparing their age to a dog.
quote:

Ok, now compare a dog's life to a cat's life. Still going with dog years both ways? Ok, they live about the same, so the 7 year old dog is 7 dog years old, and the 7 year old cat is 7 dog years old. You do what you want.
Nobody does this. We don’t have a term for this.
quote:

Now take the dog out, and let's compare a cat's life with a squirrel. Which animal do you choose to go both ways with? You have no logical way to answer this question, because you have insisted on defining "dog years" incorrectly.
Nobody does this. We don’t have a term for this.
Posted by ReauxlTide222
St. Petersburg
Member since Nov 2010
83480 posts
Posted on 5/20/19 at 7:43 pm to
quote:

Only one way makes logical sense. I'll continue to roll with the one that actually makes sense when you put a modicum of intelligent thought into it.
Who doesn’t understand your way?


I’m just saying your way isn’t how the term or concept is used.
Posted by Sun God
Member since Jul 2009
44874 posts
Posted on 5/20/19 at 7:45 pm to
This thread is peak OT
Posted by slackster
Houston
Member since Mar 2009
85007 posts
Posted on 5/20/19 at 7:45 pm to
quote:

I’m just saying your way isn’t how the term or concept is used.


, you linked two definitions that say it is used both ways.

Of those two ways, only one makes any real sense.
Posted by Korkstand
Member since Nov 2003
28709 posts
Posted on 5/20/19 at 7:50 pm to
quote:

Nobody does this. Nobody is conceptualizing or comparing their age to a dog.

People do this all the fricking time. It is the premise of this fricking thread.
quote:

Nobody does this. We don’t have a term for this.
Motherfrickers in here talking about they can define a phrase however they want, and you're here saying we don't have a term for comparing any two things?!
quote:

Nobody does this. We don’t have a term for this.

Look, it's a really simple concept. It is plain to see how the term "dog years" is constructed, and how a similar term can be constructed to compare any two animals.

That is, if you could first understand what these two simple words mean when side by side.
Posted by ReauxlTide222
St. Petersburg
Member since Nov 2010
83480 posts
Posted on 5/20/19 at 8:03 pm to
It’s bothering me that you think your explanation of this is somehow above our heads. There is nothing difficult about it. I just don’t believe it’s how people use the terms.

Some people don’t think driveway and parkway make sense. But it doesn’t change that we have an agreed upon way of using them.
Posted by DeltaTigerDelta
Member since Jan 2017
11303 posts
Posted on 5/20/19 at 8:06 pm to
Why not just drink Turbodog. One, seven- it really doesn’t matter.
Posted by GRTiger
On a roof eating alligator pie
Member since Dec 2008
63065 posts
Posted on 5/20/19 at 8:11 pm to
This thread has gone 9 pages, or 63 pages if it's a dog.
Posted by slackster
Houston
Member since Mar 2009
85007 posts
Posted on 5/20/19 at 8:13 pm to
quote:

It’s bothering me that you think your explanation of this is somehow above our heads. There is nothing difficult about it. I just don’t believe it’s how people use the terms.




7 year old lab is 54 in human years, according to Pedigree. Ouch.
Posted by slackster
Houston
Member since Mar 2009
85007 posts
Posted on 5/20/19 at 8:15 pm to
quote:

This thread has gone 9 pages, or 63 pages if it's a dog.



You motherfricker.

But that points out the stupidity of the alternative argument. A dog's life is 1/7th the lenthg of a human's - everything he does is scaled down to reflect that

If you have a 14 page thread, it's 2 pages for a dog.

If you frick 70 bitches, a dog would frick 10.

If you drink 7 beers, a dog would drink one.
Posted by slackster
Houston
Member since Mar 2009
85007 posts
Posted on 5/20/19 at 8:18 pm to


Purina is on the same page as me.
Posted by GRTiger
On a roof eating alligator pie
Member since Dec 2008
63065 posts
Posted on 5/20/19 at 8:19 pm to
Hey man, I was agreeing with you.

I used the same basis (pages). Think pages = human years.
Jump to page
Page First 7 8 9 10 11 12
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 9 of 12Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram