- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Alton Sterling-related legislation for officers clears Senate, heads to JBE
Posted on 6/2/17 at 5:13 pm to Will Cover
Posted on 6/2/17 at 5:13 pm to Will Cover
What in the fricking frick!!!
Posted on 6/2/17 at 5:14 pm to Will Cover
I have no problem with officers being required for training each year.
400 is a bit excessive, should be no longer than two weeks
400 is a bit excessive, should be no longer than two weeks
This post was edited on 6/2/17 at 5:16 pm
Posted on 6/2/17 at 5:14 pm to mikrit54
It just hit me. This also helps also those african american studies majors get jobs doing the training.
Brilliant legislation.
Brilliant legislation.
Posted on 6/2/17 at 5:14 pm to Will Cover
quote:
House Bill 277 would require all peace officers to annually complete a minimum of 400 hours of basic core curriculum training and a minimum of 20 hours of in-service training to remain accredited. It specifically requires training in de-escalation, bias policing recognition, handling mentally ill persons, and crisis intervention.
I am not sure how anyone would have a problem with this for any police force of a city But the 400 is a bit much. That's equivalent of 10 work weeks. I think if it's annually 30 to 40 would be sufficient
This post was edited on 6/2/17 at 5:16 pm
Posted on 6/2/17 at 5:15 pm to jrodLSUke
quote:
To be paid by BR tax payers, with funds going to BR politicians and their associates.
I'm sure Trudy White has a guy that can provide the necessary training
Posted on 6/2/17 at 5:15 pm to Gulf Coast Tiger
Seriously how does this clear the senate? How did these senators who are supposed to represent their constituents think that 10 weeks of training (which will be paid training, and paid FOR training) is a good idea.
Posted on 6/2/17 at 5:16 pm to TigerFred
quote:
It just hit me. This also helps also those african american studies majors get jobs doing the training. Brilliant legislation.
Of course. What else are they going to do with it?
Posted on 6/2/17 at 5:17 pm to tduecen
quote:
I have no problem with officers being required for training each year.
10 weeks on top of other training requirements?
That's beyond absurd
Posted on 6/2/17 at 5:17 pm to Will Cover
Why not pass a law that convicted felons can't posses firearms.
Oh wait, never mind.
Oh wait, never mind.
Posted on 6/2/17 at 5:19 pm to upgrayedd
10 weeks is.. two weeks would be fine
Posted on 6/2/17 at 5:20 pm to Will Cover
How do they define "in-service" training? 400 hours (!!!) of "core curriculum training" is every year?
Aren't all training hours completed for existing employees in-house considered "in-service" training? What's the difference between the 400 hr "core curriculum" training versus the 20 hour "in service" training?
Aren't all training hours completed for existing employees in-house considered "in-service" training? What's the difference between the 400 hr "core curriculum" training versus the 20 hour "in service" training?
Posted on 6/2/17 at 5:20 pm to Oyster
Shame on all the white, legal gun-owning conservatives.
Posted on 6/2/17 at 5:20 pm to Will Cover
(no message)
This post was edited on 4/11/23 at 3:26 am
Posted on 6/2/17 at 5:21 pm to gsvar2004
quote:
Seriously how does this clear the senate?
There's a plan for this. Offer a plan to demand an absurd amount of racial sensitivity training for LEO's knowing it will never pass, watch it get rejected, claim racism, profit.
Posted on 6/2/17 at 5:21 pm to Will Cover
Need to take off two of those zeros for sure.
Posted on 6/2/17 at 5:22 pm to tduecen
quote:
10 weeks is.. two weeks would be fine
Two weeks is too much. A week tops.
Posted on 6/2/17 at 5:23 pm to burgeman
That is 10 fricking weeks of completely wasted time
Posted on 6/2/17 at 5:24 pm to tduecen
2 weeks? For crying out loud! Two days would be plenty!
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News