Started By
Message

re: Acadia Parish priest arrested...

Posted on 1/21/26 at 8:59 am to
Posted by PBnJ
in your lunchbox
Member since Aug 2009
2764 posts
Posted on 1/21/26 at 8:59 am to
How do you reconcile being upset by this instance while supporting Trump, who continues to cover for an entire group of rich and powerful pedophiles?
Posted by LSUTANGERINE
Baton Rouge and Northshore LA
Member since Sep 2006
38468 posts
Posted on 1/21/26 at 9:07 am to
It’s those darned Christians again, indoctrinating and abusing kids. The mental illness is real
Posted by Bestbank Tiger
Premium Member
Member since Jan 2005
80644 posts
Posted on 1/21/26 at 9:11 am to
quote:

Priestly faculties removed in 2002


quote:

Priestly faculties removed in 1999


quote:

Laicized in 1990


Why would these be included? They weren't part of a coverup. The bishop did the right thing and defrocked them.
Posted by TulsaSooner78
Member since Aug 2025
2647 posts
Posted on 1/21/26 at 9:24 am to
quote:

Well the church turned him in soooo….


It does not state that in the report that was linked.

It says:

quote:

The Diocese of Lafayette released a statement:

“The Diocese of Lafayette has received information regarding possible misconduct by a cleric through the Acadia Parish Sheriff’s Office. The Diocese was informed that the Sheriff’s Office conducted an investigation and that an arrest was made earlier today of Father Korey Lavergne, pastor of Saint Edward Church in Richard. The Diocese will continue to assist law enforcement and requests prayers for all who are involved.”


In other words, the diocese found out about it from the sheriff's office.
Posted by TulsaSooner78
Member since Aug 2025
2647 posts
Posted on 1/21/26 at 9:37 am to
quote:


Here is a Guy with the Same Name Who is a Priest in Acadiana

If this is the guy, he left a banking career to be a priest.


I was wondering what his past history was. How long has he been a priest? At least 4 years it seems, so he probably doesn't have a history of being shuffled around from church to church.

It would be interesting to hear from some people who knew him when he was a banker to see if any of them suspected him of anything odd.

I'd also like to know how in-depth the background check was that the church performed (assuming they actually performed a background check).
This post was edited on 1/21/26 at 9:39 am
Posted by yakster
Member since Mar 2021
4103 posts
Posted on 1/21/26 at 10:09 am to
Yeah, so every single abusing priest got transferred somewhere else and nobody knew anything. Got it.
Posted by biglego
San Francisco
Member since Nov 2007
84567 posts
Posted on 1/21/26 at 10:15 am to
Too many gay men in the priesthood who are attracted to boys. Let priests get married so we get straight priests who will be attracted to girls.
Posted by Cowboyfan89
Member since Sep 2015
13041 posts
Posted on 1/21/26 at 10:47 am to
quote:

Let priests get married so we get straight priests who will be attracted to girls.

Because gay men never get married to put on the appearance that they are straight, right?

Oh, and there's never been a married man that was into kids, right?

You're assuming the child involved was a boy. Boy or girl, being married doesn't automatically mean the guy wouldn't have still done this (allegedly).

I had a married coworker years ago that got caught watching child porn on a company computer. I've known men that have come out as gay while married to a woman.

People like to blame the church for not allowing priests to marry, but neglect the fact that married men (and men that could get married) do the same terrible things. They just get far less attention because they aren't part of the same organization.

Nobody is ever going to say "those damn white men (or married men) are off doing disgusting things with kids again."
Posted by biglego
San Francisco
Member since Nov 2007
84567 posts
Posted on 1/21/26 at 12:20 pm to
You’re very defensive about gay men who prey on boys
Posted by OweO
Plaquemine, La
Member since Sep 2009
122026 posts
Posted on 1/21/26 at 12:45 pm to
I do not have those answers.
Posted by RanchoLaPuerto
Jena
Member since Aug 2023
2133 posts
Posted on 1/21/26 at 12:51 pm to
quote:

I was wondering what his past history was.


I can only tell you what I have seen. There is a Facebook post from a former parishioner in Erath that praises him. It is actually quite thoughtful, and acknolwedges that some of the faithful there believe in guilt by arrest. I think he was a seminarian in training at Erath, so his being moved to Richard is neutral.

His own video says he was in banking before he took the call. I want to say that was in Jeff Davis Parish, but I could be wrong.

As for investigation, I have seen posts saying the church turned him in, but I have not seen anything firm on that.

Some have speculated that the charge itself -- indecency -- indicates grooming behavior rather than sexual contact. I am in now way trying to diminish the culpability of someone who is indecent with a child. I am just saying that maybe the kids were not actually molested, which is maybe the best case in this instance.

That is all I've got. Take it for what it is worth.

Posted by MRTigerFan
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2008
6911 posts
Posted on 1/21/26 at 12:59 pm to
quote:

Let priests get married so we get straight priests who will be attracted to girls.

Poor choice of words. How about:
quote:

Let priests get married so we get straight priests who will be attracted to grown adult women.


But I agree with you. I think it's silly in modern times that priests can't get married. It's an outdated practice that has had significant negative consequences.
Posted by Cowboyfan89
Member since Sep 2015
13041 posts
Posted on 1/21/26 at 1:07 pm to
quote:

You’re very defensive about gay men who prey on boys

"I don't have a good response, so let me play the strawman"....

How is anything I said defensive of "gay men who prey on boys"?

It's a ridiculous argument that assumes the only people who do this kind of thing are Catholic priests, and that it is in some way tied to the requirement of celibacy, and/or someone's sexual orientation.

Taking advantage of children is a despicable act--one that has nothing to do with marital status or sexual orientation.
Posted by Missouri Waltz
Adrift off the Spanish Main
Member since Feb 2016
1446 posts
Posted on 1/21/26 at 3:50 pm to
quote:

has nothing to do with...sexual orientation

How many priests have you heard of who were accused of molesting young girls?
This post was edited on 1/21/26 at 3:51 pm
Posted by biglego
San Francisco
Member since Nov 2007
84567 posts
Posted on 1/21/26 at 5:34 pm to
quote:

It's a ridiculous argument that assumes the only people who do this kind of thing are Catholic priests, and that it is in some way tied to the requirement of celibacy, and/or someone's sexual orientation.


Well, it isn’t straight priests preying on boys
Posted by Cowboyfan89
Member since Sep 2015
13041 posts
Posted on 1/21/26 at 5:35 pm to
quote:

How many priests have you heard of who were accused of molesting young girls?

Are you trying to suggest that it's okay if it was a young girl? Because the first part of that statement was clearly saying taking advantage of children is despicable...REGARDLESS OF ANYTHING.

Ya'll are making yourselves look like fools here all Because you think allowing these guys to get married would prevent these things from happening, while neglecting the fact that non-priests do this crap as well.

It's not okay in any situation for one. And suggesting that one thing would solve this is equally ridiculous when there's nothing to suggest that it would.
Posted by JackieSonnier
South Crowley
Member since Nov 2023
460 posts
Posted on 1/21/26 at 7:39 pm to
It’s not the Christian’s…. It’s those child molesting catholic priests. They need to let them get married at this point. I wouldn’t trust a single one around my son.
Posted by GreenRockTiger
vortex to the whirlpool of despair
Member since Jun 2020
60469 posts
Posted on 1/21/26 at 7:41 pm to
Marital status has nothing to do with being a pedophile.

Many married individuals are pedophiles.
Posted by Missouri Waltz
Adrift off the Spanish Main
Member since Feb 2016
1446 posts
Posted on 1/21/26 at 7:42 pm to
quote:

Are you trying to suggest that it's okay if it was a young girl?

Of course not you imbecile. I am saying that the sexual orientation of the abusers was the driving force behind it all.
Posted by JackieSonnier
South Crowley
Member since Nov 2023
460 posts
Posted on 1/21/26 at 7:46 pm to
After reading your reply…. You seem to downplay the fact that this is a recurring issue with catholic priests.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram