re: A new tyrannosaur is found. Nanotyrannus is valid.

Ok Candice.

What do British people say when the honey badger sees them?



Tyrannosaurus



I'll see myself out

quote:

---

The fact that people actually think these things existed is mind boggling

---

Hear ya. How so-called "bright" people are so quick to swallow this whole yarn is astounding.

It just goes to underscore the massive degree of institutional gaslighting and programming we've all been subjected to.

quote:

---

Literal mountains of hard physical evidence…

---

Where? From whom? The Royal Society??

There is literally ZERO valid "physical" or otherwise that can be proven or confirmed by historical documentation.

For starters:

1. "Dinosaurs" have never existed (such animals were NOT "discovered" and mentioned historically until the mid-1800s. BY members of the Royal Society. Weird. ) Might there have been "dragons"? Yes.

2. "Millions" of years of chronology has and can never been proven. Dating methodologies were invented as a lie to discredit the Biblical chronology

3. Flimsy "proof" and bone "hoaxes" where "reconstruction" of "dinosaur" skeletons has been THE rule is totally ignored by Paleontologists and Geologists (who have both been paid by the same boss.)

quote:

---

The very same people believe 66 million years ago THIS purely fictional animal existed (based on what again?) , but the chemtrails in the sky that anyone can clearly witness firsthand and see in the sky for the past 20 years is a "CT"?

---

so you're another yogagirl/rehtaeh alter...GREAT!

quote:

---

so you're another yogagirl/rehtaeh alter...

---

Hey, nice rebuttal!

Provide any and all evidence you can of this mid-1800s "Dinosaur" fairy tale. It'd be awesome.

You’re an idiot.

quote:

---

Where? From whom? The Royal Society??

There is literally ZERO valid "physical" or otherwise that can be proven or confirmed by historical documentation.

For starters:

1. "Dinosaurs" have never existed (such animals were NOT "discovered" and mentioned historically until the mid-1800s. BY members of the Royal Society. Weird. ) Might there have been "dragons"? Yes.

2. "Millions" of years of chronology has and can never been proven. Dating methodologies were invented as a lie to discredit the Biblical chronology

3. Flimsy "proof" and bone "hoaxes" where "reconstruction" of "dinosaur" skeletons has been THE rule is totally ignored by Paleontologists and Geologists (who have both been paid by the same boss.)

---

quote:

---

You’re an idiot.

---

Good talk and exchange of ideas.

Let's do it again soon.

One of the dumbest videos ever.

Congrats.