Started By
Message

re: 65 year old woman beaten by police and arrested for not wearing mask in Texas bank.

Posted on 3/14/21 at 7:11 pm to
Posted by FredBear
Georgia
Member since Aug 2017
17565 posts
Posted on 3/14/21 at 7:11 pm to
quote:

I’d expect nothing less from the liberal OT to applaud this crap.



And many of them who are siding with the bank here believe that baker should be forced to bake that cake. Left wingers and hypocrisy go hand in hand
Posted by TheFlyingTiger
Member since Oct 2009
4187 posts
Posted on 3/14/21 at 7:11 pm to
quote:


I meant the freedom of the private business to set their own rules.



When facebook subsidiaries own the reeducation camps...
Posted by Rebel
Graceland
Member since Jan 2005
144556 posts
Posted on 3/14/21 at 7:12 pm to
quote:

And many of them who are siding with the bank here believe that baker should be forced to bake that cake.


in this case the bank and the baker are the same.

if you side with the bank, you side with the baker.

if you side the old lady, you side with two homo's that tried to force the baker to make a dick cake.
Posted by Salmon
I helped draft the email
Member since Feb 2008
86558 posts
Posted on 3/14/21 at 7:12 pm to
Ok cool

Support the businesses that don’t require masks. There are plenty.

Posted by Salmon
I helped draft the email
Member since Feb 2008
86558 posts
Posted on 3/14/21 at 7:14 pm to
quote:

And many of them who are siding with the bank here believe that baker should be forced to bake that cake. Left wingers and hypocrisy go hand in hand


100% of the people siding against the bank, sided with the baker

Now what were you saying about hypocrisy?
This post was edited on 3/14/21 at 7:16 pm
Posted by tgrbaitn08
Member since Dec 2007
148031 posts
Posted on 3/14/21 at 7:14 pm to
You know what else I’m allowed to do,

If I own a rental unit I can also not allow you to have pets or smoking inside. I also reserve the right to have you evicted if you don’t obey the rules.
Posted by Salmon
I helped draft the email
Member since Feb 2008
86558 posts
Posted on 3/14/21 at 7:15 pm to
I feel like you are about to start quoting Q
Posted by FredBear
Georgia
Member since Aug 2017
17565 posts
Posted on 3/14/21 at 7:15 pm to
quote:

100% of the people siding against the bank, sided with the banker



Not me. I stand by what I said, it's true
Posted by Salmon
I helped draft the email
Member since Feb 2008
86558 posts
Posted on 3/14/21 at 7:16 pm to
quote:

Not me. I stand by what I said, it's true


Not you what?

Posted by tgrbaitn08
Member since Dec 2007
148031 posts
Posted on 3/14/21 at 7:17 pm to
quote:


And many of them who are siding with the bank here believe that baker should be forced to bake that cake. Left wingers and hypocrisy go hand in hand


I’m siding with the bank to make their own rules and I’m against forcing the baker to bake that cake.

That shouldn’t be too hard to understand
Posted by murdock
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2004
145 posts
Posted on 3/14/21 at 7:17 pm to
The bank is not “private”
The bank is regulated by FDIC.
Posted by TheFlyingTiger
Member since Oct 2009
4187 posts
Posted on 3/14/21 at 7:17 pm to
quote:

Support the businesses that don’t require masks. There are plenty.


This isn't about masks. This is about state control of private lives through business policy that's dictated through regulation and insurance. this is a new level of techno fascism, not a simple voluntary p2b business decision.


Quit pretending like we live in a free society, and advocate for one
This post was edited on 3/14/21 at 7:18 pm
Posted by tgrbaitn08
Member since Dec 2007
148031 posts
Posted on 3/14/21 at 7:18 pm to
quote:

The bank is not “private”
The bank is regulated by FDIC.


Who let these dumbasses have the internet tonight?
Posted by Rebel
Graceland
Member since Jan 2005
144556 posts
Posted on 3/14/21 at 7:18 pm to
quote:

Not me. I stand by what I said, it's true


so you think A)the bank should not be allowed to make a "mask" policy.

and

B) the baker should be allowed to make a "no dick cake" policy?

if that is the case, you are a bit of hypocrite.
Posted by Salmon
I helped draft the email
Member since Feb 2008
86558 posts
Posted on 3/14/21 at 7:18 pm to
How am I supposed to advocate for a free society without supporting private property rights?
Posted by TheFlyingTiger
Member since Oct 2009
4187 posts
Posted on 3/14/21 at 7:19 pm to
quote:

How am I supposed to advocate for a free society without supporting private property rights


Because what we currently have isn't private property rights.

You're advocating for status quo, not freedom.
Posted by FredBear
Georgia
Member since Aug 2017
17565 posts
Posted on 3/14/21 at 7:19 pm to
I'm not siding against the bank. I don't have a problem with what they did, I'm simply observing the fact there are many in here who think that baker should have been punished for not baking that cake yet are on board with the bank here and yes, there is some vice-versa going on to
Posted by Rebel
Graceland
Member since Jan 2005
144556 posts
Posted on 3/14/21 at 7:20 pm to
quote:

The bank is not “private”
The bank is regulated by FDIC.




this is PJ level dumb.

Posted by Salmon
I helped draft the email
Member since Feb 2008
86558 posts
Posted on 3/14/21 at 7:21 pm to
quote:

Because what we currently have isn't private property rights.


The bank could choose not to enforce masks.

quote:

You're advocating for status quo, not freedom.


What exactly is your solution here?
Posted by Salmon
I helped draft the email
Member since Feb 2008
86558 posts
Posted on 3/14/21 at 7:22 pm to
quote:

I'm simply observing the fact there are many in here who think that baker should have been punished for not baking that cake yet are on board with the bank here and yes, there is some vice-versa going on to


Name names then. Call them out.
Jump to page
Page First 5 6 7 8 9 ... 17
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 7 of 17Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram