- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
2
Posted on 2/1/10 at 3:31 pm to jralspanky
quote:This.
Greer is going to have his arse in lockdown
Sidney Rice 4 catches 44 yds
Larry Fitgerald 6 catches 77 yds
Posted on 2/1/10 at 3:39 pm to JohnLSU
quote:
20 + players on this saints team has at least 1 thrown Touchdown.
so that makes the Saints receivers better?
If you include TE the Colts are better.
If not, it's close.
Posted on 2/1/10 at 3:40 pm to el tigre
So what happens if you include Bush? Or David Thomas?
Posted on 2/1/10 at 3:44 pm to el tigre
If you include Clark then I could see that. Dude is that good.
Just receivers, and it's a terrible argument. I'm just pissed because I think Drew got robbed in MVP voting this year and the argument behind it was Peyton did almost as good with a weaker supporting cast. They're going back on that argument now.
Just receivers, and it's a terrible argument. I'm just pissed because I think Drew got robbed in MVP voting this year and the argument behind it was Peyton did almost as good with a weaker supporting cast. They're going back on that argument now.
Posted on 2/1/10 at 3:56 pm to eyeran
quote:
So what happens if you include Bush?
when speaking of "receivers" it's usually implied to mean WRs or WR and TE's.
quote:
Or David Thomas?
i included him in my TE assumption. Nice signing, very underrated, but not a factor compared to Clark. Clark is freakishly good right now.
Posted on 2/1/10 at 4:03 pm to JohnLSU
Some hack on JRiB also just said, RE the Dwight Freeney injury, "it's not going to matter. The Colts are going to put up so many points that what they do defensively won't make a difference." WTF?
Posted on 2/1/10 at 4:15 pm to thetigerman
I'm guessing many of you did not see the catches Garcon was making last weekend? Some of them were truly outstanding.
Posted on 2/1/10 at 5:15 pm to TigerMeister
The reason the Saints aren't getting respect is people always remember how teams have looked recently, and the Saints have struggled against the Cowboys, Bucs, and Vikings.
Had you done this after the Patriots game or any game before the Cowboys game, they would have said the Saints are better.
It's all about perception based on how a team has looked recently.
Had you done this after the Patriots game or any game before the Cowboys game, they would have said the Saints are better.
It's all about perception based on how a team has looked recently.
Posted on 2/1/10 at 5:19 pm to ColtsTigers
So the Colts looking good has nothing to do with them playing possibly the two weakest teams in the playoffs? I'm suprised nobody has said that in the media. Oh wait, no I'm not.
Posted on 2/1/10 at 5:21 pm to DrTyger
According to the media and the numbers, the Jets have some amazing defense (even though I personally don't believe that). According to the numbers, the Saints don't have a good defense. It's as simple as that.
Posted on 2/1/10 at 5:42 pm to el tigre
why do people get worked up or even care what the media says?
Posted on 2/1/10 at 6:47 pm to TigerMeister
quote:
Tom Jackson and Mark Schlerro or w/e his name is who said that
Haha it should be easy to tell. One is white and the other is black
Posted on 2/1/10 at 6:50 pm to GynoSandberg
quote:
why do people get worked up
insecurity.
Posted on 2/1/10 at 6:51 pm to TigerMeister
quote:
Mark Schlerro
who?
Posted on 2/1/10 at 6:52 pm to TexasTiger6777
quote:
Change it to NFL Network.
Leave ESPN.
This all day and night.
Posted on 2/1/10 at 8:14 pm to ColtsTigers
quote:
According to the numbers, the Saints don't have a good defense
Prove it. We are almost exactly the same as IND but with more turnovers.
Posted on 2/1/10 at 9:19 pm to jralspanky
They disrespected us..we beat the Cardinals. They turned on more disrespect and we beat the Vikings. Their jobs and status as "experts" now called into question by everyone, they are in an all out effort to put us down. Minimum compliments always zeroed out with criticism, combined with 10 times the air time given to the Colts.
Posted on 2/1/10 at 11:37 pm to mentalis
To say are better is a joke. Colston and Meacham are tall receivers that can catch in traffic or run for a long pass. Moore is an awesome possession receiver when healthy. Henderson has had the best yards per catch of any receiver for the past several years. That is balance most teams do not see. Adding Dallas Clark boost them up a bit, but not above the Saints. Include the RB's, and it is no comparison.
Posted on 2/1/10 at 11:45 pm to mikebdatiger76
quote:
Wow, they just said on ESPN that the Colts have better recievers
To say are better is a joke. Colston and Meacham are tall receivers that can catch in traffic or run for a long pass. Moore is an awesome possession receiver when healthy. Henderson has had the best yards per catch of any receiver for the past several years. That is balance most teams do not see. Adding Dallas Clark boost them up a bit, but not above the Saints. Include the RB's, and it is no comparison.
This would probably sum it up.
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News