Started By
Message

re: Wow, they just said on ESPN that the Colts have better recievers

Posted on 2/1/10 at 11:47 pm to
Posted by DrSteveBrule
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2009
12527 posts
Posted on 2/1/10 at 11:47 pm to
Saints receiving Corp as a whole is better than the Colts. Even if you include Dallas Clark.

And I have a lot of respect for Dallas Clark... he's living proof that pro bowl invitations don't mean shite in terms of how good a player is.

As soon as Tony Gonzalez leaves the AFC, Clark gets his first pro bowl... and All-pro.
This post was edited on 2/1/10 at 11:49 pm
Posted by Mastermind
ASOM
Member since Jul 2008
1710 posts
Posted on 2/1/10 at 11:48 pm to
To be honest, the espn network can suck my big dick for all I care. This team deserves a lot more credit then they give them. Obviously they think the colts are better, does anyone remember a week ago when they proclaimed Bret Farve would run all over the saints?, tell me whose the main two teams in the superbowl.

Stare the stats for a moment, maybe that will explain the real answer.
Posted by JJ27
Member since Sep 2004
62289 posts
Posted on 2/1/10 at 11:55 pm to
quote:

According to the media and the numbers, the Jets have some amazing defense (even though I personally don't believe that).


Did you miss the New Orleans vs NYJ game? The Saints won the game and deserved to do so, but the Jets D shut the Saints down better than anyone else did the entire year. Breesus had 0 touchdowns that game and only 20/32 190 yards.

BTW, Drew Bennett said that Indy hasn't seen anything like this NOLA offense. He said they got the worst quarterbacks ever in their first 2 games. Brooks agreed with him. Do they not count as media for ESPN?
Posted by Mastermind
ASOM
Member since Jul 2008
1710 posts
Posted on 2/1/10 at 11:58 pm to
The saints have a great wr team. They have proved that against teams like Patriots, Cardnails, Eagles, and Vikings. Each of those games were all big games and amazing games. They have guys who are willing to make the big catches when the time is needed. Colts may have some good Wide Recievers but who have they really played that was hard?, they played the Jets, but the Jets weren't really that hard. They played some good teams throughout the year. The saints have hard a tougher year. The saints have come threw in a harder division. There just not getting the credit they deserve because there the underdawg. Time and Time again they have proved the Nfl Network wrong.
Posted by JJ27
Member since Sep 2004
62289 posts
Posted on 2/2/10 at 12:41 am to
quote:

The saints have come threw in a harder division.



Not true at all.
Posted by fjhjr08
The Kingdom
Member since Jun 2008
919 posts
Posted on 2/2/10 at 7:33 am to
quote:

Wow, they just said on ESPN that the Colts have better recievers


it only matters wbat they say after the game and sometimes not even then
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 3Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram