- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Vikings at Saints on 9/9/10 seems VERY likely (new insight)
Posted on 3/10/10 at 9:08 pm
Posted on 3/10/10 at 9:08 pm
According to PFT, Ron Jaworski is saying that ESPN has requested Steelers at Ravens for ESPN's Week 1 Monday Night Football doubleheader.
That means that (if granted) the Vikings are the only realistic option for the league to place opposite the Saints on Thursday Night Kickoff 9/9/10. An argument could be made for Atlanta but I think the NFC Championship rematch has a LOT more drawing power.
So the odds of Vikings @ Saints in Week 1 just went from about 50% to about 90%.
That means that (if granted) the Vikings are the only realistic option for the league to place opposite the Saints on Thursday Night Kickoff 9/9/10. An argument could be made for Atlanta but I think the NFC Championship rematch has a LOT more drawing power.
So the odds of Vikings @ Saints in Week 1 just went from about 50% to about 90%.
2
Posted on 3/10/10 at 9:11 pm to AlejandroInHouston
We will kill them this time, bring them purple bitches on!!! 
Posted on 3/10/10 at 9:14 pm to CraigBLSU
We need to start hoping that the Starcaps suspensions are laid down for Week 1.
It would suck if the Vikings bitch asses are still getting bailed out by that liberal judge and we're minus Will Smiff.
It would suck if the Vikings bitch asses are still getting bailed out by that liberal judge and we're minus Will Smiff.
Posted on 3/10/10 at 9:57 pm to AlejandroInHouston
know what you mean, but would much rather play the Williams wall with smith and have him for the next 3.
Posted on 3/10/10 at 10:01 pm to THRILLHO
how about the Browns instead? 
Posted on 3/10/10 at 10:44 pm to blueslover
Our home schedule is absolute shite next year.
3 good games (really 2 if Favre retires).
3 good games (really 2 if Favre retires).
Posted on 3/10/10 at 11:08 pm to AlejandroInHouston
quote:
Our home schedule is absolute shite next year.
3 good games (really 2 if Favre retires).
I wish our entire schedule was shite then.
Pile up those wins!
Really though, I like watching arse-whippings in person. I'll concede, it's that much sweeter when it's the Pats or G-Men, but I'll take a cake-walk win any day.
Oh, and I really hope Favre retires... After this season, I truly cannot stand the Vikings.
Posted on 3/10/10 at 11:15 pm to AlejandroInHouston
Looks like Favre won't be finishing the 2010 season.
Posted on 3/10/10 at 11:23 pm to Three 6 Italia
quote:
It would suck if the Vikings bitch asses are still getting bailed out by that liberal judge and we're minus Will Smiff.
there is 0% chance of this situation happening. The league will not allow only certain players to serve suspensions from the same round of tests while others do not serve.
the commissioner has said this before.
Posted on 3/10/10 at 11:25 pm to Brightside Bengal
Good. If we win this game then they go the frick away forever. I hate the Vikings now.
Posted on 3/11/10 at 12:04 am to Three 6 Italia
quote:
Looks like Favre won't be finishing the 2010 season.
If he takes a beating like he did in the NFCC game, he's gonna have a loooong season ahead of him.
Posted on 3/11/10 at 12:07 am to AlejandroInHouston
quote:
It would suck if the Vikings bitch asses are still getting bailed out by that liberal judge and we're minus Will Smiff.
If that was going to happen it would already have happened. What happens to the Williams will happen to all of the Star Caps guys.
The only reason Smith and Grant weren't suspended last year was the league wanting consistency and choosing not to.
Posted on 3/11/10 at 5:47 am to tigerguy121
Why would ESPN get dibs on the Steelers if NBC asked for them too?
Posted on 3/11/10 at 7:34 am to lsutigers1992
The whole Steelers/Vikings thing was based on whether Favre returns. It looks like Favre will be just as likely as Big Ben now.
Saints vs Tavaras Jackson led Vikings >>>>>> Saints vs. Dennis Dixon led Steelers.
Saints vs Tavaras Jackson led Vikings >>>>>> Saints vs. Dennis Dixon led Steelers.
This post was edited on 3/11/10 at 7:50 am
Posted on 3/11/10 at 7:39 am to BBATiger
quote:
Saints vs. Charlie Batch led Steelers
Dennis Dixon.
Posted on 3/11/10 at 10:21 am to BrSteelerfan
Im gonna go ahead and say this may be the deciding factor if Favre comes back or not. If the Vikqueens plays us first next year I bet he dont play after the beating he is still feeling today from the last time.
Posted on 3/11/10 at 10:26 am to Brightside Bengal
quote:
It would suck if the Vikings bitch asses are still getting bailed out by that liberal judge and we're minus Will Smiff.
quote:Agreed. The NFL already set the precedent for this last year with the same case. Either they'll all play or they'll all be suspended.
there is 0% chance of this situation happening.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News