- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
So if our O-line is underperforming in the run game, i want names!
Posted on 10/22/12 at 1:00 pm
Posted on 10/22/12 at 1:00 pm
I want to know exactly who is the one sucking here. I can't just assume this is all about nicks to grubbs....
7
Posted on 10/22/12 at 1:01 pm to Chad504boy
jeff faine
Posted on 10/22/12 at 1:04 pm to Chad504boy
Aaron Kromer
Posted on 10/22/12 at 1:04 pm to Chad504boy
I think they're under performing as a unit. The pass blocking has improved greatly, but they still haven't clicked as a unit when it comes to the run game.
Posted on 10/22/12 at 1:06 pm to Chad504boy
Is this a eyeball or stat question?
Posted on 10/22/12 at 1:06 pm to Patrick O Rly
quote:
but they still haven't clicked as a unit when it comes to the run game.
how come our "unit" isn't clicking when we have just about as much consistency as there is in the unit. Grubbs in/NIcks out... strief been here long time bdlp been there for bit. No excuse for not getting shite clicked.
Posted on 10/22/12 at 1:07 pm to goatmilker
quote:
Is this a eyeball or stat question?
eyballs can sometimes be more beneficial. If you got either, bring it.
Posted on 10/22/12 at 1:10 pm to Chad504boy
I'm not sure. Why did it take so long to fix our protection problems? It could also be a matter or run plays that are called and the play design.
I know only one guy changed, but Nicks would clear out people. Grubbs is no joke either, but he's no Nicks.
I know only one guy changed, but Nicks would clear out people. Grubbs is no joke either, but he's no Nicks.
Posted on 10/22/12 at 1:12 pm to Patrick O Rly
quote:
I'm not sure. Why did it take so long to fix our protection problems? It could also be a matter or run plays that are called and the play design.
i think its more of a scheming, play call design issue. Payton knew what to call at those key times... i just seldom see us taking advantages of what the D is doing.... our screening game has taken a hit too.
Posted on 10/22/12 at 1:17 pm to Chad504boy
Names huh?
How about Kromer?
How about Kromer?
Posted on 10/22/12 at 1:19 pm to Chad504boy
I think you will see a change starting this week with Kromer back just coaching them.
Posted on 10/22/12 at 1:23 pm to Chad504boy
quote:
So if our O-line is underperforming in the run game, i want names!
Posted on 10/22/12 at 1:26 pm to Chad504boy
quote:Obviously, it's all Mark Ingram's fault.
So if our O-line is underperforming in the run game, i want names!
Posted on 10/22/12 at 1:41 pm to The Sad Banana
Carmichael! I go heavy on the playcalling here. Payton is the king of the chess match strategies of playcalling. They've as much as declared Ingram is our short yardage back. When he has come into the game it has been a running play over 70% of the time. That in itself is way too predictable. Subtract the way they have used Ingram and the team rushing average goes up a half yard. Yes, he needs to show more but using him in such a predictable fashion is a losing proposition.
Posted on 10/22/12 at 2:01 pm to Chad504boy
quote:
I want to know exactly who is the one sucking here.
Payton is gone. With him goes our scheming, our play calling, our OC, our HC, our player accountability, and our coach accountability. When he is here if a player or coach messed up, he got in their face and let them know it. Kromer is nothing like that
Also with Payton, the defense had to think more, both opposing players and coached. With PC here, there is alot of predictability in our offense, which leads to better play by a defense.
Also, Vitt, our back up HC, is gone.
Also, Kromer, who is a frickhead, now has to take on the responsibility or HC plus Oline coach, so our Oline is suffering.
The problem comes from so many more than just one name.
This post was edited on 10/22/12 at 2:03 pm
Posted on 10/22/12 at 2:10 pm to blueslover
quote:
Yes, he needs to show more but using him in such a predictable fashion is a losing proposition.
Posted on 10/22/12 at 3:48 pm to The Sad Banana
I think yesterday had a lot to do with predictable playcalling. They should have had a few outside runs w/ PT or Ingram. It looked to me like TB's front 7 were squeezed inside to stop interior runs when those two were in.
Posted on 10/22/12 at 5:09 pm to Patrick O Rly
Where was Nicks on the Saints goal line stand. Getting his arse handed to him that's where. Hokie thinks its a combination of olinemen mainly in a pass protection mindset most of the time. It's hard for the olinemen to switch to run blocking mode when we pass 3/4 of the time any way.
Posted on 10/22/12 at 5:18 pm to blueslover
quote:
They've as much as declared Ingram is our short yardage back. When he has come into the game it has been a running play over 70% of the time. That in itself is way too predictable.
Yep. PT and Sproles have a combined 72 carries for 333 yards, which is a very respectable 4.625 ypc. They need to either mix it up more with Ingram or leave him on the bench.
Posted on 10/22/12 at 5:36 pm to Slapouttiger
quote::kige:
Where was Nicks on the Saints goal line stand. Getting his arse handed to him that's where. Hokie thinks its a combination of olinemen mainly in a pass protection mindset most of the time. It's hard for the olinemen to switch to run blocking mode when we pass 3/4 of the time any way.
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News