- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Saints-Vikings Comparison
Posted on 12/1/09 at 12:45 am to Flowbie
Posted on 12/1/09 at 12:45 am to Flowbie
quote:
mostly because of a bs tripping penalty that would have given us the lead at the end of the game, but it doesn't really matter. like i said before i don't mind having a loss going into the playoffs
Like i said before, I dont mind being undefeated and having control of homefield advantage
0
Posted on 12/1/09 at 12:46 am to Flowbie
your stats show that saints are superior ........
i am hellaciosuly confused
i am hellaciosuly confused
Posted on 12/1/09 at 12:46 am to Flowbie
quote:
once again i provide stats and all i get are personal attacks. good job guys
you have ignored everything we have said
Posted on 12/1/09 at 12:46 am to Flowbie
quote:
once again i provide stats and all i get are personal attacks. good job guys
You really aren't reading any of the posts, are you?
Posted on 12/1/09 at 12:46 am to Flowbie
A tough thing with comparing stats is the fact that so much has come against different teams in different circumstances. Just look at the way in which games have finished. The closest the Saints have come to losing is a hail mary at the end of the Rams game. In no other game were the Saints a play away from losing. The Vikings lost by 10 to the Steelers, won on a miracle pass by Favre, and almost lost to the Ravens had they made that last field goal.
Obviously, good teams just find a way to win, this is evident with the Colts. But when you are trying to argue that a team with a blemish on their record is better than an undefeated team, the argument is hurt by the fact that the Vikings could be 8-3 in a worst case scenario while the Saints would be 10-1.
Obviously, good teams just find a way to win, this is evident with the Colts. But when you are trying to argue that a team with a blemish on their record is better than an undefeated team, the argument is hurt by the fact that the Vikings could be 8-3 in a worst case scenario while the Saints would be 10-1.
Posted on 12/1/09 at 12:46 am to Flowbie
quote:
so overall the running game is similar. adrian peterson is a home run threat every time he touches the ball, i just cant say that about pierre thomas or mike bell. adrian is also the most physical runner in the game and really wears down a defense. if you think that doesnt matter than you don't know football
well i can't really refute that. one of the few things i can agree with
Posted on 12/1/09 at 12:46 am to Tmon225
quote:
That's his way of saying "Saints have better stats here"
if you actually read the post it says the saints have a team ypc of 4.8 and the vikings have a 4.6
i'm not sure what you're trying to say here
Posted on 12/1/09 at 12:48 am to DrTyger
How did "Adrian" do the last time he came to the Dome? My memory is a little fuzzy.
Posted on 12/1/09 at 12:48 am to Flowbie
quote:
if you actually read the post it says the saints have a team ypc of 4.8 and the vikings have a 4.6
i'm not sure what you're trying to say here
let me break it down to your slow speed
if the stats were flipped you would say "the Vikes have the edge here"
but looking at it as is you say "the stats are similar"
you got no leg to stand on
Posted on 12/1/09 at 12:48 am to Flowbie
wow you have your head so far up your arse it is insane. If Favre continues to have to throw the ball 48 times per game, his arm will go out before the Playoffs
Posted on 12/1/09 at 12:48 am to Flowbie
quote:
RB-Vikings
NFL Rushing Offense
1 Tennessee Titans 11 20.8 229 339 30.8 1,847 5.4 167.9 13 91T 73 21.5 20 7 9
2 New York Jets 11 20.9 230 389 35.4 1,774 4.6 161.3 14 71T 82 21.1 11 2 7
3 Miami Dolphins 11 23.3 256 371 33.7 1,717 4.6 156.1 17 68T 97 26.1 9 3 5
4 New Orleans Saints 10 36.9 369 324 32.4 1,543 4.8 154.3 18 55 83 25.6 11 2 5
5 Carolina Panthers 11 18.1 199 345 31.4 1,666 4.8 151.5 13 77 84 24.3 8 4 10
6 Dallas Cowboys 11 23.2 255 288 26.2 1,518 5.3 138.0 10 66 77 26.7 12 4 5
7 Cincinnati Bengals 11 21 231 362 32.9 1,488 4.1 135.3 9 61 79 21.8 10 1 8
8 Jacksonville Jaguars 11 18.4 202 303 27.5 1,459 4.8 132.6 16 80T 80 26.4 10 3 5
9 Minnesota Vikings 11 31.1 342 331 30.1 1,421 4.3 129.2 13 64T 69 20.8 13 3 7
10 New York Giants 11 24.7 272 328 29.8 1,395 4.3 126.8 8 38 72 22.0 6 0 6
Posted on 12/1/09 at 12:48 am to Flowbie
quote:
taking out qb sacks for this stat, which is a more accurate reading of the run game
I could be wrong, but I'm pretty sure sack yardage is taken away from passing yards in the NFL. Sack yardage is taken away from rushing yards in college.
Posted on 12/1/09 at 12:49 am to NawlinsTiger9
quote:.
How did "Adrian" do the last time he came to the Dome? My memory is a little fuzzy
we won that game with him only rushing for 30 yards, so to bring that game up is pretty retarded
Posted on 12/1/09 at 12:49 am to Flowbie
you won on a fricking pass interference call dude
Posted on 12/1/09 at 12:50 am to Flowbie
quote:
we won that game with him only rushing for 30 yards, so to bring that game up is pretty retarded
and to say he would run all over our much improved defense is VERY retarted
Posted on 12/1/09 at 12:50 am to DestrehanTiger
quote:
I could be wrong, but I'm pretty sure sack yardage is taken away from passing yards in the NFL. Sack yardage is taken away from rushing yards in college.
You are wrong.
Posted on 12/1/09 at 12:50 am to DestrehanTiger
quote:
I could be wrong, but I'm pretty sure sack yardage is taken away from passing yards in the NFL. Sack yardage is taken away from rushing yards in college.
you are probably right, but i took out brett favre's 6 rushes for -3 and tarvaris jackson's rushes for negative yardage, and also took away mark brunell's negative yardage and then went from there
Posted on 12/1/09 at 12:51 am to Flowbie
quote:Rice is at least = to Colston. Colston's body of work>>>>>Rice's body of work
sidney rice is better than anyone you have
quote:Meach>Berrian
plus we have berrian
quote:Henderson>Harvin
harvin
quote:Who? Anyway Moore is better than him.
shiancoe
quote:Bush out of the backfield>>>>>>>>>Taylor
chester taylor out of the backfield
quote:yeah right
Greg lewis
Posted on 12/1/09 at 12:51 am to Flowbie
quote:
we won that game with him only rushing for 30 yards, so to bring that game up is pretty retarded
he has a point, but thats last years crappy defense
this means ap would rush for like 10 yards this year
This post was edited on 12/1/09 at 12:53 am
Posted on 12/1/09 at 12:51 am to St Augustine
quote:
you won on a fricking pass interference call dude
ok i was worried i was losing my memory! thanks for reminding me
Page 6 of 14
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News