re: Saints-Vikings Comparison

quote:

---

LSUZombie

---

Holy frick, are you trying to combat the troll with your own troll? Your post was retarded.

quote:

---

Holy frick, are you trying to combat the troll with your own troll? Your post was retarded.

---

Holy frick, how am i trolling on a board i am a fan of? argue with what i posted or gtfo, fricking fig

quote:

---

, but pierre + bell + bush > AP

---

Name one GM in the league that would take those 3 backs over AP. Also, some teams are still game planning solely to stop AP (which is one reason Favre is lighting teams up). If you are wondering why Favre threw 48 times against the Bears, it's because the Bears kept stacking the box. Chester Taylor is no slouch and would start for multiple teams.

quote:

---

Receiving Corps-Saints - this one shows how stupid you are. saints starting 3 receivers (colston, henderson, meachem) are better than anyone on the vikings roster. and then throw shockey is for kicks.

---

This is where you really show your ignorance. Sidney Rice and Colston are a wash. Berrian has had a more productive career than anyone on the Saints excluding Colston. Lastly, I'd take Harvin over any Saints receiver not named Colston. The Saints are deeper at receiver, but less talented at the top. I believe the Saints have not one but two TEs that are better than what the Vikings have(Shockey and Thomas).

quote:

---

D-Line-Push- Jared Allen is great. Will Smith has been great as well. add that sedrick ellis and out d-line can go toe-to-toe with yours

---

This is just retarded.

quote:

---

Coaching-Saints - a well coached team will always win. saints coaches are at the top of their game.

---

It's obvious the Saints have the coaching advantage, but saying the better coached team always wins is fricking stupid. I'm sure in the history of football a badly coached team has never beaten a well coached team. Also, big players make big plays. The Vikings have the better playmakers.

quote:

---

saints would win probably 42-17.

---

I'd say the Vikings are better than the Colts but worse than the Saints as of now. Predicting a 42-17 score just shows how much of a homer you are. Do you really think the Saints are 25 points better than the next best team in the league?

quote:

---

DestrehanTiger

---

I think homefield will play a huge role in this game. It will probably be the deciding factor.

In my opinion, the Vikings have the best talent in the NFL. But the Saints have a great coaching staff to go along with a lot of talent.

Put it this way, if the Vikings had Darren Sharper and Gregg Williams, I don't think anyone would beat them.

But they were dumb enough to think Sharper was washed up bc they stick to that Cover 2 scheme.

But the Vikings may have the best roster I've seen in the NFL this decade if Favre keeps playing the way he is. Tons of playmakers, top OL, top DL, etc.

Their only weakness is safety, again, bc they were dumb enough to think Sharper is washed up.

That's why I mentioned the Cover 2. Your fans all told us he was washed up, when the real reason he wasn't making a lot of plays is bc the Cover 2 restricts safeties to only cover their part of the field.

From what I've seen this year, Johnson hasn't played very well. I remember Vernon Davis killing you down the middle in that SF game.

The Vikings have a great roster, but seem to give up a lot of yards passing when you consider that they have maybe the best DE in football rushing the passer.