- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Saints Projected Starting Lineup Ranked 32nd
Posted on 7/22/25 at 2:04 pm to BadatBourre
Posted on 7/22/25 at 2:04 pm to BadatBourre
quote:quote:
When the QB position is the weakness, why would any of the weapons be mentioned if you have major reservations about the guy that needs to get them the ball for them to be effective?
Because I can name about 25 WRs off the top of my head who have all had 1k receiving yards with sub par QBs. Good WRs are still going to get yards even with bad QBs.
Good for you, now explain how either of them would be named in an article in which they are pointing out each team's strengths, weaknesses, X factor, or nonstarter to watch for.
The QB is the weakness; neither would qualify as nonstarters. So would you list them as the team's strength or X-factor (which should rightfully be the oline)?
1
Posted on 7/22/25 at 4:46 pm to saints5021
quote:
Most of the doomers have been complaining for years that we need to rebuild. This is how you do it.
Im sure Gayle and Mickey will build a dynasty
Posted on 7/22/25 at 10:24 pm to Weekend Warrior79
Bro, did you write this article or something? If you can't tell that our WRs are a strength of this team and a key building block of this teams future moving forward, you may just be blind.
Posted on 7/23/25 at 9:20 am to BadatBourre
quote:
If you can't tell that our WRs are a strength of this team and a key building block of this teams future moving forward, you may just be blind.
Then I must be blind. If the team had a true #1, I would agree with this. But the fact of the matter is they have one of the lower level #1s in the league. Shaheed had been forced into the #2 role because we didn't have anyone else to fit that role. Now we have Cooks & Shaheed fighting for the #2 & #3 spots.
They are not a weakness, but I would say they are a legitimate #1 from being a strength.
Posted on 7/23/25 at 10:05 am to Weekend Warrior79
No argument.
If we are very fortunate this year WR#1 will be the main focus next year on offense.
If we are very fortunate this year WR#1 will be the main focus next year on offense.
Posted on 7/23/25 at 11:15 am to goatmilker
quote:
If we are very fortunate this year WR#1 will be the main focus next year on offense.
And/ or a stud TE.
Posted on 7/24/25 at 2:17 am to saintsfan1977
You better buckle up then baby because the black and gold is about to 0-17 the frick out of this season.
Posted on 7/24/25 at 9:39 am to Weekend Warrior79
quote:
But the fact of the matter is they have one of the lower level #1s in the league. Shaheed had been forced into the #2 role because we didn't have anyone else to fit that role. Now we have Cooks & Shaheed fighting for the #2 & #3 spots.
I would say that Shaheed was probably our #1 before his injury. He had more targets in the games he and Olave played together. Either way, I agree that we need a legit top end #1 WR or TE.
Posted on 7/24/25 at 11:41 am to chadr07
quote:
You better buckle up then baby because the black and gold is about to 0-17 the frick out of this season
The reason the Eagles won the SB is going 0-17? Gtfo
Page 3 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News