Started By
Message

re: Saints 7 Seahawks 34 - FINAL

Posted on 12/2/13 at 9:49 pm to
Posted by Breesus
Unplug
Member since Jan 2010
69549 posts
Posted on 12/2/13 at 9:49 pm to
This is unreal.

Absolutely unreal.

Ed Hoculi can eat shite and die
Posted by LakeCountryRed
Training for the Kumite
Member since Feb 2013
2224 posts
Posted on 12/2/13 at 9:49 pm to
Mother fricker this game
Posted by Tigressa del Norte
Seattle
Member since Jan 2009
3099 posts
Posted on 12/2/13 at 9:49 pm to
It's one of those games in the NFL. Seachacks would've beat anyone tonight. Except maybe the Pats.

Posted by StringedInstruments
Member since Oct 2013
20862 posts
Posted on 12/2/13 at 9:49 pm to
The question isn't him going out of bounds and reestablishing himself or whatever.

He didn't secure the catch. He was in the air, got two feet, hit the ground and lost the ball.

Wasn't that why Calvin Johnson lost his touchdown a few years ago?
Posted by Ziggy
Member since Oct 2007
22101 posts
Posted on 12/2/13 at 9:50 pm to
Posted by The Sad Banana
The gate is narrow.
Member since Jul 2008
89507 posts
Posted on 12/2/13 at 9:50 pm to
quote:

Ed Hoculi can eat shite and die
what? It was the right call. The saints don't have it tonight.
Posted by CBandits82
Lurker since May 2008
Member since May 2012
58991 posts
Posted on 12/2/13 at 9:50 pm to
Might be the first game I've turned off in the middle in a long time.

I mean frick man
Posted by BlackenedOut
The Big Sleazy
Member since Feb 2011
6058 posts
Posted on 12/2/13 at 9:50 pm to
There is no consistency in the NFL when a player goes to the ground following a catch and the ball moves. None.
Posted by Breesus
Unplug
Member since Jan 2010
69549 posts
Posted on 12/2/13 at 9:50 pm to
quote:

He didn't secure the catch. He was in the air, got two feet, hit the ground and lost the ball.

Wasn't that why Calvin Johnson lost his touchdown a few years ago?


Payton said the exact same thing
Posted by kingbob
Sorrento, LA
Member since Nov 2010
70374 posts
Posted on 12/2/13 at 9:50 pm to
yep, many many many times
Posted by hashtag
Comfy, AF
Member since Aug 2005
33536 posts
Posted on 12/2/13 at 9:51 pm to
a lot of these calls appear to have gone against the Saints, but most have just been bad luck. The lack of holding penalties on Seattle's OL is the only thing that is blatant.

The biggest issue to me is that it appears that these refs had a bet about how much face time they could get. It seems like they just want to see if they can be on screen more than the players. Even the calls they made against Seattle have been stupid. They are ignoring obvious calls and calling a bunch of stupid stuff as often as possible.
Posted by Wolfhound45
Member since Nov 2009
127346 posts
Posted on 12/2/13 at 9:51 pm to
quote:

I am absolutely not looking forward to next weeks game now. I don't care that we are at home. Playing another cocky as hell confident ball club that's on a roll.


I know many are frustrated but I am calling it now. We bounce back next week and win.
Posted by Brettesaurus Rex
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2009
38261 posts
Posted on 12/2/13 at 9:51 pm to
quote:

I am absolutely not looking forward to next weeks game now. I don't care that we are at home. Playing another cocky as hell confident ball club that's on a roll.

Next week sets the tone for the entire season. If we can't get angry and play with some fricking fire and take control, we're ending up the 5th seed and probably one and done once again. But if we do and take down the Panthers, I'll be eyeing another shot at these guys in the playoffs. Even if it is back in Seattle. They won't be so lucky again.
Posted by Tiger in NY
Neptune Beach, FL
Member since Sep 2003
31584 posts
Posted on 12/2/13 at 9:51 pm to
Are you not watching the same replays as me? The guy obviously had 2 feet in settled before becoming the second player to touch the ball
Posted by Rickety Cricket
Premium Member
Member since Aug 2007
46883 posts
Posted on 12/2/13 at 9:51 pm to
On the bright side, at least I won't be up late watching this dogshit.
Posted by Tigressa del Norte
Seattle
Member since Jan 2009
3099 posts
Posted on 12/2/13 at 9:51 pm to
I like Macanudos. Lord Claridge was nice as I recall.
Posted by jdrumdog
baton rouge, la
Member since Jan 2010
7655 posts
Posted on 12/2/13 at 9:51 pm to
quote:


You seem to be confused over the point I was making, but feel free to continue to feel good about yourself.



I answered your question. You had a one word response with zero retort. Therefore unless you have a good counterpoint I'll continue to, uh, feel good about myself.

Any football team that shows up as 9-2 that plays like this for this long in this type of game doesn't deserve the victory. Doesn't mean I wouldn't take it, but they damn sure wouldn't have earned it without a plethora of breaks.

But continue to dodge the issue. Sounds like an intelligent idea.
This post was edited on 12/2/13 at 9:52 pm
Posted by Marco Esquandolas
Member since Jul 2013
11808 posts
Posted on 12/2/13 at 9:51 pm to
Will Seattle put up 50?
Posted by StringedInstruments
Member since Oct 2013
20862 posts
Posted on 12/2/13 at 9:51 pm to
quote:

what? It was the right call. The saints don't have it tonight.


What about the holding call?

You know, the one where even Tirico and Gruden said, "Oh yeah it's coming back obvious hold by Carpenter."

But the ref was calling it a defensive hold against the Saints and then called it off all together.
Posted by Tigressa del Norte
Seattle
Member since Jan 2009
3099 posts
Posted on 12/2/13 at 9:51 pm to
Oh come on. You have to see how it ends!

Jump to page
Page First 127 128 129 130 131 ... 149
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 129 of 149Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram