- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Reminder that Loomis
Posted on 10/20/25 at 10:34 am to goatmilker
Posted on 10/20/25 at 10:34 am to goatmilker
quote:
What’s up 20/20
Is it 20/20 when you call shite out before it happens? You should look up the definition when you have time.
I’m not so much a big Pickens fan, just a tired of retarded trades by Loomis fan…
2
Posted on 10/20/25 at 11:00 am to Townedrunkard
You’re too desperate to be right about something it’s pathetic when you blame a wide receiver who catches everything thrown into and then shitting on the quarterback that hasn’t even played yet, but let’s make all the declarations as possible
Posted on 10/20/25 at 11:13 am to Chad504boy
quote:
You’re too desperate to be right about something it’s pathetic when you blame a wide receiver who catches everything thrown into and then shitting on the quarterback that hasn’t even played yet, but let’s make all the declarations as possible
Or I just think it was retarded giving up premium picks for guys pushing 30 when it usually takes a year or two for the game to slow down on a team devoid of talent.
If you going to give up premium picks, at least do it for a talented player like Pickens. Not a receiver 5th on the depth chart.
This post was edited on 10/20/25 at 11:16 am
Posted on 10/20/25 at 11:23 am to Townedrunkard
Or more like third/4th on the depth chart. Not fifth.
Posted on 10/20/25 at 11:28 am to dj30
It's funny to see people wanting to entertain a head case, "psycho" wide receiver. We had that in Michael Thomas and then we didn't like him very much. 
Posted on 10/20/25 at 11:36 am to Chad504boy
quote:
Or more like third/4th on the depth chart. Not fifth
He was the fifth receiver on Denver.
This post was edited on 10/20/25 at 11:37 am
Posted on 10/20/25 at 11:38 am to Townedrunkard
quote:
He was the fifth receiver on Denver.
ok. brb... going to find the relevance.
Posted on 10/20/25 at 11:38 am to LooseCannon22282
quote:
He's just gotten too complacent with his job.
This isn't a sign of that.
He truly believed we were going to be competitive this year and made a "win now" move.
It's more incompetency and arrogance than complacency.
This post was edited on 10/20/25 at 11:38 am
Posted on 10/20/25 at 11:39 am to death valley driver
quote:
Vele is under team control for minimum salary until 2029.
2027, not 2029
*ETA: he'll be 30 in 2027
This post was edited on 10/20/25 at 11:40 am
Posted on 10/20/25 at 11:41 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Vele is under team control for minimum salary until 2029.
quote:
2027, not 2029
2028 not 2027.
he's under contract UNTIL 2028.
who cares about his age.
Posted on 10/20/25 at 11:41 am to Townedrunkard
Me too. I tire of special posters who think Loomis picks the players and forces them on the HC. It’s beyond idiotic and tiresome. CKM picked the WR. Loomis finds the price. HC says yes or no.
Posted on 10/20/25 at 11:48 am to goatmilker
quote:
CKM picked the WR. Loomis finds the price. HC says yes or no.
So Moore is the gm and head of personnel now? He shoujd be worrying more about X’s and O’s rather than wasting his time scanning every teams depth charts looking for players.
This post was edited on 10/20/25 at 11:49 am
Posted on 10/20/25 at 12:07 pm to SlowFlowPro
I'm saying though he has no one holding him accountable
And when that happens I believe you can become complacent.
But I would agree with you. I think it really is more of a case of arrogance, but that's how a lot of general managers are. A lot of them really believe they are so close.
And when that happens I believe you can become complacent.
But I would agree with you. I think it really is more of a case of arrogance, but that's how a lot of general managers are. A lot of them really believe they are so close.
Posted on 10/20/25 at 12:39 pm to Chad504boy
quote:
ok. brb... going to find the relevance.
There’s no point in carrying on this conversation if you don’t think there’s relevance between giving up almost the same draft pick for a teams 5th receiver or a teams number one receiver which Pickens was on the Steelers.
This post was edited on 10/20/25 at 12:40 pm
Posted on 10/20/25 at 1:15 pm to Townedrunkard
You can quit comparing the Pickens trade, you already got schooled on the differences
Posted on 10/20/25 at 2:20 pm to Townedrunkard
I can’t help you. 
PS
Of course the Loomis has more power. He just doesn’t use it to force feed a fricking player on a first year HC still evaluating his team. It’s just not done in our current circumstance.
PS
Of course the Loomis has more power. He just doesn’t use it to force feed a fricking player on a first year HC still evaluating his team. It’s just not done in our current circumstance.
This post was edited on 10/20/25 at 2:25 pm
Posted on 10/20/25 at 3:26 pm to Chad504boy
quote:
You can quit comparing the Pickens trade, you already got schooled on the differences
Looking at the stats of both players this year, you should be the one going back to school….
Pickens 36 607 6tds
Vele 4 29 1td
This post was edited on 10/20/25 at 3:28 pm
Posted on 10/20/25 at 3:58 pm to Townedrunkard
quote:
Looking at the stats of both players this year, you should be the one going back to school….
Pickens 36 607 6tds
Vele 4 29 1td
cool.
We have vele for 2 more years.
After that, we'll add the financial cost of each player and the total of the 3 years and do a cost per reception.
Remember, we are a team in financial dire trying to reset the cap and get back to more normal. Getting cheap production is sort of what you want to pay draft capital for. You are being so drama over so many trivial things.
Posted on 10/21/25 at 12:25 am to Chad504boy
quote:
Remember, we are a team in financial dire trying to reset the cap and get back to more normal. Getting cheap production is sort of what you want to pay draft capital for. You are being so drama over so many trivial things.
That went out the window with some of the contracts Loomis gave out THIS year. Like we would be competing for something. If he wanted to reset the cap, this year was the year do it.
Sign only vet min guys, let Young, JJ, walk. Don’t sign Cooks. That’s almost 35 million a year in savings right there.
Posted on 10/21/25 at 7:15 pm to Chad504boy
Pickens won't even be on the Cowboys next season. He's going to get paid like Lamb and his agent is the same as Parson's
This post was edited on 10/21/25 at 7:16 pm
Page 2 of 3
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News