- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Predict New Orleans record for next year
Posted on 2/3/15 at 2:07 pm to craig8sm
Posted on 2/3/15 at 2:07 pm to craig8sm
if we go 6-10 then it's probably over. No way we recover from two losing seasons (and a downward trend) while Brees is still able to play at a high level.
For the record, I think that result is highly unlikely.
For the record, I think that result is highly unlikely.
Posted on 2/5/15 at 2:00 am to CSB
quote:
7-9 at best.
You're a miserable person, and absolutely clueless. Bless your heart.
Posted on 2/5/15 at 11:36 am to CocoLoco
quote:
You're a miserable person, and absolutely clueless. Bless your heart.
Hmm, I seem to recall you laughing at me when I said Carolina would win the division last year.... We'll see what happens next season.
Posted on 2/5/15 at 5:58 pm to CSB
CoolStoryBro
The division was garbage, what a great call. You must be a genius.
Anyway, picking the Saints to go AT BEST 7-9 is borderline retarded. AT BEST they could catch fire again and get 13 wins, and I see that being possible depending on off season moves.
The division was garbage, what a great call. You must be a genius.
Anyway, picking the Saints to go AT BEST 7-9 is borderline retarded. AT BEST they could catch fire again and get 13 wins, and I see that being possible depending on off season moves.
Posted on 2/6/15 at 8:30 am to CocoLoco
Tell me where you see more than 4-5 slam dunk wins on that schedule. Spoiler alert: you can't.
Posted on 2/6/15 at 9:26 am to CSB
quote:
Tell me where you see more than 4-5 slam dunk wins on that schedule. Spoiler alert: you can't.
I think the problem is that you don't know what "at best" means.
Posted on 2/6/15 at 10:07 am to TigerBait1127
At best they go 19-0, win the superb owl, and everyone is happy. There you go, satisfied?
Posted on 2/6/15 at 10:13 am to CSB
quote:
At best they go 19-0, win the superb owl, and everyone is happy. There you go, satisfied?
I was never not satisfied, but I still think you're an idiot.
Posted on 2/6/15 at 10:22 am to TigerBait1127
quote:
never not
Yeah, I'm the idiot...
Posted on 2/6/15 at 11:09 am to CSB
quote:
never not
Yeah, I'm the idiot...
Set the bait and caught me one.
That sentence is grammatically correct.
So yes, you are still the idiot.
This post was edited on 2/6/15 at 11:22 am
Posted on 2/6/15 at 12:02 pm to TigerBait1127
This post was edited on 2/6/15 at 12:44 pm
Posted on 2/6/15 at 2:27 pm to CSB
There is a reason MOST double negatives aren't logical: they create a positive or the opposite of what the user was intending.
The never in my case doesn't do that. It adds emphasis that I was not unsatisfied or never not satisfied (means the same thing). I'm intending to to create an opposite there to add emphasis that I wasn't unsatisfied with your post.
I hope I learnt you something (that was intentional)
Back to the point, I think saying the Saints will go 7-9 is reasonable given our blocking issues, defense, etc.
Still, it took a lot of bad luck even with a pretty unfriendly schedule for us to go 7-9 this year. Our issues are at positions that we can save a lot of money via cuts. Guard and Center aren't highly valued in the draft or via free agency as far as $$ goes, and it is one of the easiest transitions from college to the NFL or from another system.
So, I can understand someone saying that he thinks we'll go 7-9, because it just happened. Do you think the Saints will have the same injuries as last year (4 safeties out, 2 NTs out, Cooks out, Graham hurt, etc.), or do you even think we'll have the same #2 corner as last year?
If 7-9 is our best, what do you EXPECT our record to be? 5 wins? 4 wins?
So we can only win slam dunk games? Our best performances last year were vs. Green Bay, @Pitt, and @Carolina.
As of now, the "slam dunks" (really dumb statement in the NFL) are, Tampa x2, Jacksonville, Titans, and Washington. Arizona may be up there too if Palmer doesn't come back in time.
Games we should win (we'll be favored in most of these at least): 1 vs Atlanta, 1 vs Carolina, Giants, Detroit, @Houston, @Philly (rookie QB).
Toss Ups: Dallas @ Home, Detroit @ Home
Games we'll probably lose: 1 vs Atlanta, 1 vs Carolina, @Indy
You look at the Saints problems and ignore the problems other team's on our schedule have. We'll beat some teams that should beat us like we did this year, and we'll probably drop some that we shouldn't too. We are 1 year removed from winning 11 games, and we have a pretty talented roster.
The never in my case doesn't do that. It adds emphasis that I was not unsatisfied or never not satisfied (means the same thing). I'm intending to to create an opposite there to add emphasis that I wasn't unsatisfied with your post.
I hope I learnt you something (that was intentional)
Back to the point, I think saying the Saints will go 7-9 is reasonable given our blocking issues, defense, etc.
Still, it took a lot of bad luck even with a pretty unfriendly schedule for us to go 7-9 this year. Our issues are at positions that we can save a lot of money via cuts. Guard and Center aren't highly valued in the draft or via free agency as far as $$ goes, and it is one of the easiest transitions from college to the NFL or from another system.
So, I can understand someone saying that he thinks we'll go 7-9, because it just happened. Do you think the Saints will have the same injuries as last year (4 safeties out, 2 NTs out, Cooks out, Graham hurt, etc.), or do you even think we'll have the same #2 corner as last year?
If 7-9 is our best, what do you EXPECT our record to be? 5 wins? 4 wins?
quote:
Tell me where you see more than 4-5 slam dunk wins on that schedule. Spoiler alert: you can't.
So we can only win slam dunk games? Our best performances last year were vs. Green Bay, @Pitt, and @Carolina.
As of now, the "slam dunks" (really dumb statement in the NFL) are, Tampa x2, Jacksonville, Titans, and Washington. Arizona may be up there too if Palmer doesn't come back in time.
Games we should win (we'll be favored in most of these at least): 1 vs Atlanta, 1 vs Carolina, Giants, Detroit, @Houston, @Philly (rookie QB).
Toss Ups: Dallas @ Home, Detroit @ Home
Games we'll probably lose: 1 vs Atlanta, 1 vs Carolina, @Indy
You look at the Saints problems and ignore the problems other team's on our schedule have. We'll beat some teams that should beat us like we did this year, and we'll probably drop some that we shouldn't too. We are 1 year removed from winning 11 games, and we have a pretty talented roster.
This post was edited on 2/6/15 at 2:43 pm
Posted on 2/6/15 at 2:44 pm to TigerBait1127
I can understand someone saying 7-9 to 907 range, I get that. But when you say they'll do that AT BEST, you're being dumb. I think they'll have an improved season personally, because they seem to be serious about fixing that. A lot of things went wrong for them to get to 7-9, a lot.
I don't see Payton and Brees allowing that to happen again.
I don't see Payton and Brees allowing that to happen again.
Posted on 2/7/15 at 3:44 pm to Napoleon
Best 10-6
Realistic 8-8
Worst 6-10
Realistic 8-8
Worst 6-10
Posted on 2/7/15 at 3:58 pm to TechDawg2007
8-8 at best. We are a team rebuilding with little cap space and incapable of filling needs in the draft outside of the first pick. If our scouting department misses this year it will only extend the disappointment in N.O. including my own. If we free up some space and add some impact players to the D, and avoid injury we may do better. Just my opinion.
Back to top
