- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Olave better be the real deal
Posted on 4/28/22 at 11:51 pm
Posted on 4/28/22 at 11:51 pm
He ended up costing us a first, second, two thirds and a fourth to draft.
A mini Rickey Williams type deal.
A mini Rickey Williams type deal.
7
Posted on 4/29/22 at 12:36 am to Townedrunkard
Go to sleep.
Posted on 4/29/22 at 8:21 am to Townedrunkard
Do you people realize what you're saying? I would say 3 picks in the top 2 rounds are much better than 4 or 5 in the top 4 rounds.
Posted on 4/29/22 at 8:36 am to Townedrunkard
He just needs to be productive. Doesn’t have to be All Pro his rookie year.
Posted on 4/29/22 at 9:21 am to Townedrunkard
You should get your facts straight before posting
Posted on 4/29/22 at 10:52 am to LSUPilot07
quote:
You should get your facts straight before posting
Please please spell out where my facts are wrong. I’ll wait.
You should take your own advice.
This post was edited on 4/29/22 at 10:53 am
Posted on 4/29/22 at 10:57 am to Townedrunkard
quote:
Please please spell out where my facts are wrong. I’ll wait.
Because he didn't cost us a first because we used a first this year to get him. those two cancel out.
Posted on 4/29/22 at 11:00 am to mindbreaker
quote:
Because he didn't cost us a first because we used a first this year to get him. those two cancel out.
So will we have our first next year or will the Eagles have it?
Look at my statement, what I said was correct. Still cost a first to draft him. 5 draft picks total to draft one player.
This post was edited on 4/29/22 at 11:03 am
Posted on 4/29/22 at 11:05 am to Townedrunkard
You’re wrong. It did not “cost” as in we are down a first round pick because we had ONE this year and used TWO.
That second first would’ve been our first next year. The net effect is the same, and if we are in the playoffs we come out ahead
That second first would’ve been our first next year. The net effect is the same, and if we are in the playoffs we come out ahead
This post was edited on 4/29/22 at 11:07 am
Posted on 4/29/22 at 11:08 am to Proximo
quote:
You’re wrong. It did not “cost” as in we are down a first round pick because we had ONE this year and used TWO.
You are wrong. So if we traded the rest of our draft this year 2nd, third, fourth, etc moved up into the first and drafted him, we’d still have our first next year and he would not have cost us a first.
This post was edited on 4/29/22 at 11:15 am
Posted on 4/29/22 at 11:09 am to Townedrunkard
Listen here brainlet. How does one player cost you two total in this scenario?
We drafted two players in the first round this year. It’s the same number of first round picks we would’ve had regardless
We drafted two players in the first round this year. It’s the same number of first round picks we would’ve had regardless
Posted on 4/29/22 at 11:16 am to Proximo
quote:
Listen here brainlet. How does one player cost you two total in this scenario?
Brainlet? Where did I say he cost us two total firsts? I said he cost us a first. Five total picks to draft him.
Posted on 4/29/22 at 11:19 am to Townedrunkard
That’s like saying any player cost us a draft pick. No fricking shite, what else are you going to do with a draft pick?
Don’t use the term “cost” when you’re looking for “used”. It implies you’re net negative in firsts for this scenario
Don’t use the term “cost” when you’re looking for “used”. It implies you’re net negative in firsts for this scenario
Posted on 4/29/22 at 11:19 am to Proximo
quote:
We drafted two players in the first round this year. It’s the same number of first round picks we would’ve had regardless
So we would have had two firsts this year if we didn’t make the Eagles trade ‘costing’ us our first next year? Is that what you are saying?
Posted on 4/29/22 at 11:22 am to Proximo
quote:
Don’t use the term “cost” when you’re looking for “used”. It implies you’re net negative in firsts for this scenario
I just spelled out the scenario earlier. If we traded our entire draft this year for Eagles #16 and kept next years first? Would Olave have cost us a first then?
Answer that.
He would have cost us 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th, 6th, 7th whatever but not a first.
This post was edited on 4/29/22 at 11:23 am
Posted on 4/29/22 at 11:36 am to Townedrunkard
We do this for defensive ends yearly!
Posted on 4/29/22 at 11:37 am to Townedrunkard
Saints getting robbed again.
Saints just got Brandon Cooks 2.0
Saints just got Brandon Cooks 2.0
This post was edited on 4/29/22 at 11:39 am
Posted on 4/29/22 at 11:45 am to Doublebagger
quote:You mean that wr that routinely gets 1,000+ yard 10 TD seasons?
Saints just got Brandon Cooks 2.0
Posted on 4/29/22 at 11:56 am to Townedrunkard
First of all a first next year is worth much less than a first this year. Also, we got some other picks back from the Eagles.
Posted on 4/29/22 at 11:58 am to Townedrunkard
I see Olave as the most certain WR in the entire draft. I don't see superstar in him, but I do see consistent, reliable, fundamentally sound. We won't be disappointed.
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News